Literature DB >> 17504980

Standardizing slide-based assays in breast cancer: hormone receptors, HER2, and sentinel lymph nodes.

Jeffrey S Ross1, W Fraser Symmans, Lajos Pusztai, Gabriel N Hortobagyi.   

Abstract

Despite the rapid expansion of novel diagnostics designed to personalize breast cancer care, there remain several significant unmet needs for improving the accuracy and reliability of tests that are already in common daily clinical practice. For example, although immunohistochemistry has been the predominant method for measuring estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status for over 15 years, this assay remains unstandardized and there is a widespread concern that inaccuracy in immunohistochemistry technique and interpretation is leading to an unacceptably high error rate in determining the true hormone receptor status. Similarly, there is considerable concern that both false-negative and false-positive result rates for testing for HER2 status are unacceptably high in current clinical practice. This commentary considers a variety of factors, including preanalytic conditions and slide-scoring procedures, and other variables that may be contributing to current testing error rates and why there is a great need for the standardization of these biomarker assay procedures to further enable the highest possible quality of care for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17504980     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  21 in total

Review 1.  Breast cancer assessment tools and optimizing adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Catherine Oakman; Libero Santarpia; Angelo Di Leo
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  [Interlaboratory trials for quality assurance of breast cancer biomarkers in Germany].

Authors:  C A Krusche; R von Wasielewski; J Rüschoff; A Fisseler-Eckhoff; H H Kreipe
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  Implementation of External Quality Assurance Trials for Immunohistochemically Determined Breast Cancer Biomarkers in Germany.

Authors:  Reinhard von Wasielewski; Claudia A Krusche; Joseph Rüschoff; Anette Fisseler-Eckhoff; Hans Kreipe
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Experimental validation of peptide immunohistochemistry controls.

Authors:  Steven A Bogen; Kodela Vani; Brian McGraw; Vin Federico; Iqbal Habib; Ron Zeheb; Ed Luther; Colin Tristram; Seshi R Sompuram
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2009-05

5.  Proficiency testing of immunohistochemical biomarker assays in breast cancer.

Authors:  Reinhard von Wasielewski; Svenja Hasselmann; Josef Rüschoff; Annette Fisseler-Eckhoff; Hans Kreipe
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Proteogenomic Landscape of Breast Cancer Tumorigenesis and Targeted Therapy.

Authors:  Karsten Krug; Eric J Jaehnig; Shankha Satpathy; Lili Blumenberg; Alla Karpova; Meenakshi Anurag; George Miles; Philipp Mertins; Yifat Geffen; Lauren C Tang; David I Heiman; Song Cao; Yosef E Maruvka; Jonathan T Lei; Chen Huang; Ramani B Kothadia; Antonio Colaprico; Chet Birger; Jarey Wang; Yongchao Dou; Bo Wen; Zhiao Shi; Yuxing Liao; Maciej Wiznerowicz; Matthew A Wyczalkowski; Xi Steven Chen; Jacob J Kennedy; Amanda G Paulovich; Mathangi Thiagarajan; Christopher R Kinsinger; Tara Hiltke; Emily S Boja; Mehdi Mesri; Ana I Robles; Henry Rodriguez; Thomas F Westbrook; Li Ding; Gad Getz; Karl R Clauser; David Fenyö; Kelly V Ruggles; Bing Zhang; D R Mani; Steven A Carr; Matthew J Ellis; Michael A Gillette
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Minimising immunohistochemical false negative ER classification using a complementary 23 gene expression signature of ER status.

Authors:  Qiyuan Li; Aron C Eklund; Nicolai Juul; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Christopher T Workman; Andrea L Richardson; Zoltan Szallasi; Charles Swanton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  The Year in Basic Science: update of estrogen plus progestin therapy for menopausal hormone replacement implicating stem cells in the increased breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Kathryn B Horwitz
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2008-10-09

Review 9.  Prognostic and predictive factors and genetic analysis of early breast cancer.

Authors:  Miguel Martín; Fernando González Palacios; Javier Cortés; Juan de la Haba; José Schneider
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.405

10.  A gene expression profile for detection of sufficient tumour cells in breast tumour tissue: microarray diagnosis eligibility.

Authors:  Paul Roepman; Arenda Schuurman; Leonie J M J Delahaye; Anke T Witteveen; Arno N Floore; Annuska M Glas
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 3.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.