John R Fowler1, Asif M Ilyas. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA. fowler@temple.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent advances in technology and the use of image archiving and communication systems (PACS) has led some institutions to abandon conventional plain film radiography and rely solely on digital computed radiography. The level of accuracy of digital radiography in measuring distances for orthopaedic applications is unclear. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Is it possible to accurately measure small distances using digital radiographs and PACS software? MATERIALS AND METHODS: A model for measuring articular step-off was created using a commercially produced radiographic phantom with predetermined markings at known distances. Radiographs were taken using both indirect and direct computed radiography systems, then uploaded to a PACS system. Eighteen observers measured the distance between standardized, preselected points on the radiographic phantom. The measured values were compared with the known values for each measurement. RESULTS: The mean measured values differed by 0 and 0.1 mm (SD, 0.5 mm) for indirect and direct radiographs, respectively, when measuring short distances and 1.4 mm and 2.6 mm (SD, 1.0 mm) for indirect and direct radiographs, respectively, when measuring longer distances. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for interobserver reliability was 0.82 for indirect and 0.75 for direct digital radiography. The ICC for intraobserver reliability was 0.94 for indirect and 0.90 for direct digital radiography. CONCLUSION: Although the mean measured values were very accurate (within 0.1 mm for a known distance of 3.2 mm), the SD of measurements (0.5 mm) could affect the interpretation of data, especially in clinical situations such as evaluating the quality of fracture reduction.
BACKGROUND: Recent advances in technology and the use of image archiving and communication systems (PACS) has led some institutions to abandon conventional plain film radiography and rely solely on digital computed radiography. The level of accuracy of digital radiography in measuring distances for orthopaedic applications is unclear. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Is it possible to accurately measure small distances using digital radiographs and PACS software? MATERIALS AND METHODS: A model for measuring articular step-off was created using a commercially produced radiographic phantom with predetermined markings at known distances. Radiographs were taken using both indirect and direct computed radiography systems, then uploaded to a PACS system. Eighteen observers measured the distance between standardized, preselected points on the radiographic phantom. The measured values were compared with the known values for each measurement. RESULTS: The mean measured values differed by 0 and 0.1 mm (SD, 0.5 mm) for indirect and direct radiographs, respectively, when measuring short distances and 1.4 mm and 2.6 mm (SD, 1.0 mm) for indirect and direct radiographs, respectively, when measuring longer distances. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for interobserver reliability was 0.82 for indirect and 0.75 for direct digital radiography. The ICC for intraobserver reliability was 0.94 for indirect and 0.90 for direct digital radiography. CONCLUSION: Although the mean measured values were very accurate (within 0.1 mm for a known distance of 3.2 mm), the SD of measurements (0.5 mm) could affect the interpretation of data, especially in clinical situations such as evaluating the quality of fracture reduction.
Authors: Gail A Woolhiser; John W Brand; Michael M Hoen; James R Geist; Agata A Pikula; Frank E Pink Journal: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod Date: 2005-04
Authors: M Garmer; S P Hennigs; H J Jäger; F Schrick; T van de Loo; A Jacobs; A Hanusch; A Christmann; K Mathias Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Dae Kyung Bae; Young Wan Ko; Sang Jun Kim; Jong Hun Baek; Sang Jun Song Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2016-02-11 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Jong Woo Kang; Soo Min Cha; Sang-Gyun Kim; In Cheul Choi; Dong Hun Suh; Jong Woong Park Journal: J Orthop Surg Res Date: 2021-02-04 Impact factor: 2.359