Literature DB >> 30361755

Supine lateral radiographs at 90° of knee flexion have a similar diagnostic accuracy for chronic posterior cruciate ligament injuries as stress radiographs.

Sang-Gyun Kim1, Soo-Hyun Kim1, Won-Suk Choi1, Ji-Hoon Bae2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate whether supine lateral radiographs (SLRs) could replace stress radiographs for diagnosing chronic posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries and identifying combined PCL injuries (defined as PCL injury with medial collateral ligament or posterolateral ligament complex injury).
METHODS: In this retrospective study, both SLRs at 30° and 90° of knee flexion (30/90 SLRs) and Telos stress radiographs of patients with chronic PCL injuries (n = 38) and only 30/90 SLRs of healthy controls (n = 84) were taken. Injured-to-normal differences on 30/90 SLRs and stress radiographs were assessed. Correlation analysis was performed to evaluate injured-to-normal differences on 30/90 SLRs and stress radiographs in patients with chronic PCL injury. Subgroup analysis was performed to compare injured-to-normal differences on 30/90 SLRs and stress radiographs between the isolated and combined PCL injury groups. Receiver operating characteristic curves based on 30/90 SLRs were calculated to determine the cut-off value for diagnosing chronic PCL injury and identifying combined PCL injury.
RESULTS: Injured-to-normal differences on both 30 SLRs (3.1 ± 3.6 vs 1.6 ± 1.2, P = 0.019) and 90 SLRs (7.5 ± 3.5 vs 1.2 ± 1.0, P < 0.001) were significantly greater in patients with chronic PCL injuries than in healthy controls. Further, 90 SLRs had a highly accurate diagnostic value for chronic PCL injuries (area under the curve 0.958). The cut-off value for diagnosing chronic PCL injuries based on 90 SLRs was 3.0 mm (sensitivity, 94.7%; specificity, 92.9%). Injured-to-normal differences on 30/90 SLRs were significantly correlated with those on stress radiographs. The correlation coefficients were 0.397 (P = 0.014) for 30 SLRs and 0.605 (P < 0.001) for 90 SLRs. The cut-off value for diagnosing combined PCL injuries based on 90 SLRs was 9.6 mm (area under the curve 0.72).
CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic accuracy of 90 SLRs for chronic PCL injuries was similar to that of stress radiographs. Therefore, the 90 SLRs are reliable alternative method to assess the posterior knee laxity when the stress radiographs are not available. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cut-off value; Diagnosis; Injured-to-normal difference; Posterior cruciate ligament; Stress radiography

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30361755     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-5228-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  26 in total

Review 1.  Principles and practical application of the receiver-operating characteristic analysis for diagnostic tests.

Authors:  M Greiner; D Pfeiffer; R D Smith
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2000-05-30       Impact factor: 2.670

2.  Stress radiography for quantifying posterior cruciate ligament deficiency.

Authors:  Fabrizio Margheritini; Luca Mancini; Craig S Mauro; Pier Paolo Mariani
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Reliability of stress radiography for evaluation of posterior knee laxity.

Authors:  Martin S Schulz; Kai Russe; Georgios Lampakis; Michael J Strobel
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Distribution of posterior tibial displacement in knees with posterior cruciate ligament tears.

Authors:  Martin S Schulz; Eric S Steenlage; Kai Russe; Michael J Strobel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Stress radiography to measure posterior cruciate ligament insufficiency: a comparison of five different techniques.

Authors:  Tobias M Jung; Carsten Reinhardt; Sven U Scheffler; Andreas Weiler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-06-24       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Accuracy of stress radiography techniques in grading isolated and combined posterior knee injuries: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Guido Garavaglia; Anne Lubbeke; Victor Dubois-Ferrière; Domizio Suva; Daniel Fritschy; Jacques Menetrey
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 7.  Current concepts review: comprehensive physical examination for instability of the knee.

Authors:  James H Lubowitz; Brad J Bernardini; John B Reid
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the kneeling technique of stress radiography for the evaluation of posterior knee laxity.

Authors:  Todd Jackman; Robert F LaPrade; Thomas Pontinen; Paul A Lender
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of the normal human knee.

Authors:  Richard D Komistek; Douglas A Dennis; Mohamed Mahfouz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Effect of posterior cruciate ligament deficiency on in vivo translation and rotation of the knee during weightbearing flexion.

Authors:  Guoan Li; Ramprasad Papannagari; Meng Li; Jeffrey Bingham; Kyung W Nha; Dain Allred; Thomas Gill
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  2 in total

1.  Clinically Reliable Knee Flexion Angle Measured on Stress Radiography for Quantifying Posterior Instability in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.

Authors:  Dong Jin Ryu; Kyeu Baek Kwon; Eui Yub Jung; Sung-Sahn Lee; Joo Hwan Kim; Min Chang Jang; Joon Ho Wang
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-03-22

2.  Comparable Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes Between an Anatomic Tunnel and a Low Tibial Tunnel in Remnant-Preserving Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Kyoung Ho Yoon; Jung-Suk Kim; Jae-Young Park; Soo Yeon Park; Raymond Yeak Dieu Kiat; Sang-Gyun Kim
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-02-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.