Literature DB >> 20972629

Using Rasch analysis to form plausible health states amenable to valuation: the development of CORE-6D from a measure of common mental health problems (CORE-OM).

Ifigeneia Mavranezouli1, John E Brazier, Tracey A Young, Michael Barkham.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe a new approach for deriving a preference-based index from a condition specific measure that uses Rasch analysis to develop health states.
METHODS: The CORE-OM is a 34-item instrument monitoring clinical outcomes of people with common mental health problems. The CORE-OM is characterised by high correlation across its domains. Rasch analysis was used to reduce the number of items and response levels in order to produce a unidimensional measure and to generate a credible set of health states corresponding to different levels of symptom severity using the Rasch item threshold map.
RESULTS: The proposed methodology resulted in the development of CORE-6D, a 2-dimensional health state descriptive system consisting of a unidimensional 5-item emotional component (derived from Rasch analysis) and a physical symptom item. Inspection of the Rasch item threshold map of the emotional component helped identify a set of 11 plausible health states, which, combined with 3 physical symptom item levels, form 33 plausible health states that can be used for the valuation of the instrument, resulting in the development of a preference-based index.
CONCLUSIONS: This is a useful new approach to develop preference-based measures from existing instruments with high correlations across domains. The CORE-6D preference-based index will enable calculation of Quality-Adjusted Life Years in people with common mental health problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20972629     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-010-9768-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  27 in total

Review 1.  A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation.

Authors:  J Brazier; M Deverill; C Green; R Harper; A Booth
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36.

Authors:  John Brazier; Jennifer Roberts; Mark Deverill
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Service profiling and outcomes benchmarking using the CORE-OM: toward practice-based evidence in the psychological therapies. Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measures.

Authors:  M Barkham; F Margison; C Leach; M Lucock; J Mellor-Clark; C Evans; L Benson; J Connell; K Audin; G McGrath
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2001-04

4.  The use of rasch analysis in reducing a large condition-specific instrument for preference valuation: the case of moving from AQLQ to AQL-5D.

Authors:  Tracey A Young; Yaling Yang; John E Brazier; Aki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 5.  The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: what is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper?

Authors:  Alan Tennant; Philip G Conaghan
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2007-12-15

6.  Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system.

Authors:  David Feeny; William Furlong; George W Torrance; Charles H Goldsmith; Zenglong Zhu; Sonja DePauw; Margaret Denton; Michael Boyle
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Mapping the EORTC QLQ C-30 onto the EQ-5D instrument: the potential to estimate QALYs without generic preference data.

Authors:  Lynda McKenzie; Marjon van der Pol
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 5.725

8.  Empirically defined health states for depression from the SF-12.

Authors:  C A Sugar; R Sturm; T T Lee; C D Sherbourne; R A Olshen; K B Wells; L A Lenert
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Estimating a preference-based index for a menopause specific health quality of life questionnaire.

Authors:  John E Brazier; Jennifer Roberts; Maria Platts; York F Zoellner
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Estimation of a preference-based index from a condition-specific measure: the King's Health Questionnaire.

Authors:  John Brazier; Carolyn Czoski-Murray; Jennifer Roberts; Martin Brown; Tara Symonds; Con Kelleher
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 2.583

View more
  15 in total

1.  Developing preference-based health measures: using Rasch analysis to generate health state values.

Authors:  Tracey A Young; Donna Rowen; Josephine Norquist; John E Brazier
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Deriving a preference-based measure for cancer using the EORTC QLQ-C30.

Authors:  Donna Rowen; John Brazier; Tracey Young; Sabine Gaugris; Benjamin M Craig; Madeleine T King; Galina Velikova
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.725

3.  Rasch analysis in the development of a simplified version of the National Eye Institute Visual-Function Questionnaire-25 for utility estimation.

Authors:  Jonathan W Kowalski; Anne M Rentz; John G Walt; Andrew Lloyd; Jeff Lee; Tracey A Young; Wen-Hung Chen; Neil M Bressler; Paul Lee; John E Brazier; Ron D Hays; Dennis A Revicki
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Using existing data to identify candidate items for a health state classification system in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Ayse Kuspinar; Lois Finch; Simon Pickard; Nancy E Mayo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  The Role of Condition-Specific Preference-Based Measures in Health Technology Assessment.

Authors:  Donna Rowen; John Brazier; Roberta Ara; Ismail Azzabi Zouraq
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  How valid and responsive are generic health status measures, such as EQ-5D and SF-36, in schizophrenia? A systematic review.

Authors:  Diana Papaioannou; John Brazier; Glenys Parry
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 7.  Measuring patient-reported outcomes: moving beyond misplaced common sense to hard science.

Authors:  Stephen P McKenna
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  Understanding the impacts of care farms on health and well-being of disadvantaged populations: a protocol of the Evaluating Community Orders (ECO) pilot study.

Authors:  H Elsey; R Bragg; M Elings; J E Cade; C Brennan; T Farragher; S Tubeuf; R Gold; D Shickle; N Wickramasekera; Z Richardson; J Murray
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Estimating a preference-based index from the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM): valuation of CORE-6D.

Authors:  Ifigeneia Mavranezouli; John E Brazier; Donna Rowen; Michael Barkham
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2012-11-25       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Assessing the impact of care farms on quality of life and offending: a pilot study among probation service users in England.

Authors:  Helen Elsey; Tracey Farragher; Sandy Tubeuf; Rachel Bragg; Marjolein Elings; Cathy Brennan; Rochelle Gold; Darren Shickle; Nyantara Wickramasekera; Zoe Richardson; Janet Cade; Jenni Murray
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.