Literature DB >> 10392311

A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation.

J Brazier1, M Deverill, C Green, R Harper, A Booth.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10392311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Technol Assess        ISSN: 1366-5278            Impact factor:   4.014


× No keyword cloud information.
  91 in total

Review 1.  Valuing health-related quality of life. A review of health state valuation techniques.

Authors:  C Green; J Brazier; M Deverill
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Utility scores for different health states related to depression: individual participant data analysis.

Authors:  Spyros Kolovos; Judith E Bosmans; Johanna M van Dongen; Birre van Esveld; Dorcas Magai; Annemieke van Straten; Christina van der Feltz-Cornelis; Kirsten M van Steenbergen-Weijenburg; Klaas M Huijbregts; Harm van Marwijk; Heleen Riper; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Quality of life related to fear of falling and hip fracture in older women: a time trade off study.

Authors:  G Salkeld; I D Cameron; R G Cumming; S Easter; J Seymour; S E Kurrle; S Quine
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-02-05

4.  Health-related quality of life in type 1 diabetes without or with symptoms of long-term complications.

Authors:  J Hahl; H Hämäläinen; H Sintonen; T Simell; S Arinen; O Simell
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  The development and use of quality-of-life measures to evaluate health outcomes in Japan.

Authors:  Shunichi Fukuhara; Naoki Ikegami; George W Torrance; Shuzo Nishimura; Michael Drummond; François Schubert
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Can EQ-5D and 15D be used interchangeably in economic evaluations? Assessing quality of life in post-stroke patients.

Authors:  Lene Lunde
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2012-06-08

7.  Developing preference-based health measures: using Rasch analysis to generate health state values.

Authors:  Tracey A Young; Donna Rowen; Josephine Norquist; John E Brazier
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Using Rasch analysis to form plausible health states amenable to valuation: the development of CORE-6D from a measure of common mental health problems (CORE-OM).

Authors:  Ifigeneia Mavranezouli; John E Brazier; Tracey A Young; Michael Barkham
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 9.  A review and critique of studies reporting utility values for schizophrenia-related health states.

Authors:  Ifigeneia Mavranezouli
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 10.  Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D.

Authors:  Stephen J Walters; John E Brazier
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.