Literature DB >> 20972602

A primer on common statistical errors in clinical ophthalmology.

Karen Holopigian1, Michael Bach.   

Abstract

Although biomedical statistics is part of any scientific curriculum, a review of the current scientific literature indicates that statistical data analysis is an area that frequently needs improvement. To address this, we here cover some of the most common problems in statistical analysis, with an emphasis on an intuitive, tutorial approach rather than a rigorous, proof-based one. The topics covered in this manuscript are whether to enter eyes or patients into the analysis, issues related to multiple testing, pitfalls surrounding the correlation coefficient (causation, insensitivity to patterns, range confounding, unsuitability for method comparisons), and when to use standard deviation (SD) versus standard error of the mean (SEM) "antennas" on graphs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20972602     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-010-9249-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  9 in total

1.  Accounting for the correlation between fellow eyes in regression analysis.

Authors:  R J Glynn; B Rosner
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-03

2.  Inference by eye: confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data.

Authors:  Geoff Cumming; Sue Finch
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2005 Feb-Mar

Review 3.  People and eyes: statistical approaches in ophthalmology.

Authors:  I E Murdoch; S S Morris; S N Cousens
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Eyes or patients? Traps for the unwary in the statistical analysis of ophthalmological studies.

Authors:  R G Newcombe; G R Duff
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Multivariate methods in ophthalmology with application to other paired-data situations.

Authors:  B Rosner
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Appropriate statistical methods to account for similarities in binary outcomes between fellow eyes.

Authors:  J Katz; S Zeger; K Y Liang
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Error bars in experimental biology.

Authors:  Geoff Cumming; Fiona Fidler; David L Vaux
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2007-04-09       Impact factor: 10.539

Review 9.  Statistical errors in medical research - a review of common pitfalls.

Authors:  Alexander M Strasak; Qamruz Zaman; Karl P Pfeiffer; Georg Göbel; Hanno Ulmer
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2007-01-27       Impact factor: 2.193

  9 in total
  12 in total

1.  Reliability of acuities determined with the sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP).

Authors:  William H Ridder; Anna Tong; Theresa Floresca
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  On network derivation, classification, and visualization: a response to Habeck and Moeller.

Authors:  Erik B Erhardt; Elena A Allen; Eswar Damaraju; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2011

3.  Pattern electroretinogram to detect glaucoma: comparing the PERGLA and the PERG Ratio protocols.

Authors:  Michael Bach; Anke Ramharter-Sereinig
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Marked dissociation of photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity even in normal observers.

Authors:  Hannah Hertenstein; Michael Bach; Nikolai Johannes Gross; Flemming Beisse
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Visual evoked potential-based acuity assessment: overestimation in amblyopia.

Authors:  Yaroslava Wenner; Sven P Heinrich; Christina Beisse; Antje Fuchs; Michael Bach
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Full-field electroretinogram in autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Paul A Constable; Sebastian B Gaigg; Dermot M Bowler; Herbert Jägle; Dorothy A Thompson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Evaluation of the "Freiburg Acuity VEP" on Commercial Equipment.

Authors:  Michael Bach; Jeffrey D Farmer
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  LASIK versus PRK for high astigmatism.

Authors:  Michael Mimouni; Russell Pokroy; Gilad Rabina; Igor Kaiserman
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.031

9.  On network derivation, classification, and visualization: a response to Habeck and Moeller.

Authors:  Erik B Erhardt; Elena A Allen; Eswar Damaraju; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2011-06-08

10.  A multi-step pathway connecting short sleep duration to daytime somnolence, reduced attention, and poor academic performance: an exploratory cross-sectional study in teenagers.

Authors:  Santiago Perez-Lloret; Alejandro J Videla; Alba Richaudeau; Daniel Vigo; Malco Rossi; Daniel P Cardinali; Daniel Perez-Chada
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 4.062

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.