Literature DB >> 20968384

Learning to use an artificial visual cue in speech identification.

Joseph D W Stephens1, Lori L Holt.   

Abstract

Visual information from a speaker's face profoundly influences auditory perception of speech. However, relatively little is known about the extent to which visual influences may depend on experience, and extent to which new sources of visual speech information can be incorporated in speech perception. In the current study, participants were trained on completely novel visual cues for phonetic categories. Participants learned to accurately identify phonetic categories based on novel visual cues. These newly-learned visual cues influenced identification responses to auditory speech stimuli, but not to the same extent as visual cues from a speaker's face. The novel methods and results of the current study raise theoretical questions about the nature of information integration in speech perception, and open up possibilities for further research on learning in multimodal perception, which may have applications in improving speech comprehension among the hearing-impaired.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20968384      PMCID: PMC2981124          DOI: 10.1121/1.3479537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  25 in total

1.  Merging information in speech recognition: feedback is never necessary.

Authors:  D Norris; J M McQueen; A Cutler
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Hearing lips and seeing voices.

Authors:  H McGurk; J MacDonald
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976 Dec 23-30       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Listening with eye and hand: cross-modal contributions to speech perception.

Authors:  C A Fowler; D J Dekle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The motor theory of speech perception revisited.

Authors:  Dominic W Massaro; Trevor H Chen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-04

Review 5.  Shortlist B: a Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition.

Authors:  Dennis Norris; James M McQueen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Speech analysis and synthesis by linear prediction of the speech wave.

Authors:  B S Atal; S L Hanaver
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception.

Authors:  W F Ganong
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Speech perception in perceivers with hearing loss: synergy of multiple modalities.

Authors:  D W Massaro; M M Cohen
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Benefit from visual cues in auditory-visual speech recognition by middle-aged and elderly persons.

Authors:  B E Walden; D A Busacco; A A Montgomery
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1993-04
View more
  3 in total

1.  Audiovisual speech perception: A new approach and implications for clinical populations.

Authors:  Julia Irwin; Lori DiBlasi
Journal:  Lang Linguist Compass       Date:  2017-03-26

2.  A standard set of American-English voiced stop-consonant stimuli from morphed natural speech.

Authors:  Joseph D W Stephens; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.017

3.  Speech is not special… again.

Authors:  Kathy M Carbonell; Andrew J Lotto
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.