Literature DB >> 20968376

Spectral and temporal changes to speech produced in the presence of energetic and informational maskers.

Martin Cooke1, Youyi Lu.   

Abstract

Talkers change the way they speak in noisy conditions. For energetic maskers, speech production changes are relatively well-understood, but less is known about how informational maskers such as competing speech affect speech production. The current study examines the effect of energetic and informational maskers on speech production by talkers speaking alone or in pairs. Talkers produced speech in quiet and in backgrounds of speech-shaped noise, speech-modulated noise, and competing speech. Relative to quiet, speech output level and fundamental frequency increased and spectral tilt flattened in proportion to the energetic masking capacity of the background. In response to modulated backgrounds, talkers were able to reduce substantially the degree of temporal overlap with the noise, with greater reduction for the competing speech background. Reduction in foreground-background overlap can be expected to lead to a release from both energetic and informational masking for listeners. Passive changes in speech rate, mean pause length or pause distribution cannot explain the overlap reduction, which appears instead to result from a purposeful process of listening while speaking. Talkers appear to monitor the background and exploit upcoming pauses, a strategy which is particularly effective for backgrounds containing intelligible speech.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20968376     DOI: 10.1121/1.3478775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  16 in total

1.  Effects of the rate of formant-frequency variation on the grouping of formants in speech perception.

Authors:  Robert J Summers; Peter J Bailey; Brian Roberts
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-13

2.  Children's perception of speech produced in a two-talker background.

Authors:  Mallory Baker; Emily Buss; Adam Jacks; Crystal Taylor; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Speech produced in noise: Relationship between listening difficulty and acoustic and durational parameters.

Authors:  Simone Graetzer; Pasquale Bottalico; Eric J Hunter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Noise hampers children's expressive word learning.

Authors:  Kristine Grohne Riley; Karla K McGregor
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Speech modifications in interactive speech: effects of age, sex and noise type.

Authors:  Outi Tuomainen; Linda Taschenberger; Stuart Rosen; Valerie Hazan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  The neural control of volitional vocal production-from speech to identity, from social meaning to song.

Authors:  Sophie K Scott
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Conversational Coordination of Articulation Responds to Context: A Clinical Test Case With Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Stephanie A Borrie; Camille J Wynn; Visar Berisha; Nichola Lubold; Megan M Willi; Carl A Coelho; Tyson S Barrett
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  The Clear-Speech Benefit for School-Age Children: Speech-in-Noise and Speech-in-Speech Recognition.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Heather L Porter; Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  T'ain't what you say, it's the way that you say it--left insula and inferior frontal cortex work in interaction with superior temporal regions to control the performance of vocal impersonations.

Authors:  Carolyn McGettigan; Frank Eisner; Zarinah K Agnew; Tom Manly; Duncan Wisbey; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Articulatory movements modulate auditory responses to speech.

Authors:  Z K Agnew; C McGettigan; B Banks; S K Scott
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.