Literature DB >> 20957031

cDNA microarray gene expression profiling of hedgehog signaling pathway inhibition in human colon cancer cells.

Ting Shi1, Tapati Mazumdar, Jennifer Devecchio, Zhong-Hui Duan, Akwasi Agyeman, Mohammad Aziz, Janet A Houghton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hedgehog (HH) signaling plays a critical role in normal cellular processes, in normal mammalian gastrointestinal development and differentiation, and in oncogenesis and maintenance of the malignant phenotype in a variety of human cancers. Increasing evidence further implicates the involvement of HH signaling in oncogenesis and metastatic behavior of colon cancers. However, genomic approaches to elucidate the role of HH signaling in cancers in general are lacking, and data derived on HH signaling in colon cancer is extremely limited. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: To identify unique downstream targets of the GLI genes, the transcriptional regulators of HH signaling, in the context of colon carcinoma, we employed a small molecule inhibitor of both GLI1 and GLI2, GANT61, in two human colon cancer cell lines, HT29 and GC3/c1. Cell cycle analysis demonstrated accumulation of GANT61-treated cells at the G1/S boundary. cDNA microarray gene expression profiling of 18,401 genes identified Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs) both common and unique to HT29 and GC3/c1. Analyses using GenomeStudio (statistics), Matlab (heat map), Ingenuity (canonical pathway analysis), or by qRT-PCR, identified p21(Cip1) (CDKN1A) and p15(Ink4b) (CDKN2B), which play a role in the G1/S checkpoint, as up-regulated genes at the G1/S boundary. Genes that determine further cell cycle progression at G1/S including E2F2, CYCLIN E2 (CCNE2), CDC25A and CDK2, and genes that regulate passage of cells through G2/M (CYCLIN A2 [CCNA2], CDC25C, CYCLIN B2 [CCNB2], CDC20 and CDC2 [CDK1], were down-regulated. In addition, novel genes involved in stress response, DNA damage response, DNA replication and DNA repair were identified following inhibition of HH signaling.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This study identifies genes that are involved in HH-dependent cellular proliferation in colon cancer cells, and following its inhibition, genes that regulate cell cycle progression and events downstream of the G1/S boundary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20957031      PMCID: PMC2948497          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Hedgehog (HH) signaling plays a critical role in a variety of normal cellular processes. It is pivotal in embryogenesis, regulation of the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, the patterning of a diverse range of vertebrate structures in a variety of organs, maintenance of adult tissue homeostasis, tissue repair, cellular proliferation, and in cell survival [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. The canonical HH pathway is also critical to normal mammalian gastrointestinal development, where it is involved in the coordinate regulation of differentiation of normal intestinal villi [10], [11], [12]. Thus, in the normal gastrointestinal tract, HH ligands are induced in the differentiated cells around the villous surface, generating a negative feedback loop to inhibit canonical WNT signaling in the basal cells of the crypt, thereby protecting differentiated cells from the proliferative effects of WNT [13]. Activation of the canonical HH signaling pathway comprises the binding of HH ligands to the membrane receptor Patched (PTCH1), which becomes internalized leading to the activation of the signaling molecule Smoothened (SMO) via release from PTC-mediated suppression. SMO activates the final arbiter of HH signaling, the GLI family of transcription factors that bind to the GACCACCCA-like consensus binding element in promoter sequences to transcriptionally regulate HH target genes [3], [14], [15]. GLI1 and GLI2, the transcriptional activators of HH signaling, possess distinct as well as overlapping functions that involve activator (GLI1 and GLI2) or repressor (GLI2) activities [16]; however, their roles in the regulation of HH-driven cellular proliferation, survival or cell death processes are poorly understood. Historically, GLI1 has been considered the most reliable marker of HH pathway activity, however GLI2 appears to be the primary activator of HH signaling, with GLI1 as a transcriptional target of GLI2 [3], [7], leading to augmentation of HH signaling both quantitatively as well as qualitatively [16]. An important feature of GLI proteins is that their biological activity is context-dependent, influenced by the cellular environment [17], [18]. Activation of the canonical HH signaling cascade is aberrantly activated and well known to play a critical role in oncogenesis and maintenance of the malignant phenotype in several types of human cancers. Such activation involves amplification of GLI1 or GLI2, mutations in PTC or SMO, or dysregulated gene expression [3], [4]; these malignant cells are also sensitive to the small molecule inhibitor that targets SMO, cyclopamine [4], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23]. Colon carcinomas are thought to derive from constitutive activation of WNT signaling by mutation of the APC or β-CATENIN genes, while the involvement of the HH signaling pathway is not as clear. In gastrointestinal malignancies, transcriptional up-regulation of HH ligands has been identified as the predominant activator of HH signaling in these diseases (reviewed in [3]). In addition, there is emerging evidence that HH signaling is involved in colorectal carcinogenesis [24], [25], colon carcinoma stem cell self renewal, and in the metastatic behavior of advanced colon cancers [26]. However, genomic approaches to elucidate the role of HH signaling in cancers in general are lacking, regulatory genes downstream of GLI1 and GLI2 that function in cellular proliferation, survival, and maintenance of the malignant HH phenotype remain incompletely characterized [5], and data derived on HH signaling in colon cancer is extremely limited. Cellular proliferation is driven by progression of cells through the cell cycle consisting of sequential passage through G1, S, G2 and M phases. Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) associate with cyclins to drive the cell cycle machinery [27], [28]. Thus, CDK2 associates with CYCLIN E at the G1/S transition and with CYCLIN A during S-phase, CDK4 and CDK6 bind to CYCLIN D during progression at G1/S, while CDC2 complexes with CYCLIN A at G2, and with CYCLIN B during the G2/M transition. CDC25 family members also regulate cell cycle progression through dephosphorylation of the CDKs [29], [30]. CDK inhibitors, including p21Cip1 [29], [31] and p15Ink4b [[32], bind to cyclin-CDK complexes during the cell cycle transition, in particular at G1/S (p21Cip1, p15Ink4b;[32]) and G2/M (p21Cip1;[29]), and can also induce cell cycle arrest at the G1/S boundary following cytostatic signals through functional inhibition of cyclin-CDK complexes. The E2F family of transcription factors also regulates the expression of genes required for the G1/S transition, in particular genes involved in the activation of the DNA replication machinery, and DNA repair [33]. cDNA microarray technology has provided the ability to study the expression of thousands of genes simultaneously, and is an important tool in the dissection of signal transduction pathways. For the HH signaling cascade, HH/GLI target gene expression has been examined following EGF stimulation [6] or inducible GLI1 [16] or GLI2 [9] gene activation in human keratinocytes, or in GLI1-induced cell transformation [7]. To identify unique downstream targets of the GLI genes that function in cellular proliferation in the context of colon carcinoma, we employed a small molecule inhibitor of both GLI1 and GLI2, GANT61, identified in a cell-based small molecule screen for inhibitors of GLI1-mediated transcription [34]. GANT61 acts in the nucleus to block GLI1 function, inhibits both GLI1- and GLI2- mediated transcription, and demonstrates a high degree of selectivity for HH/GLI signaling [34]. Thus, GANT61 acts downstream of cyclopamine (targeting SMO) to inhibit the final determinants of HH transcriptional regulation. In two human colon carcinoma cell lines, HT29 and GC3/c1, inhibiting the HH signaling pathway using GANT61 decreased expression of GLI1, GLI2 and the HH ligand receptor, PTCH1, and inhibited proliferation by inducing cellular accumulation at the G1/S boundary 24 hr after treatment, determined by flow cytometric analysis. On further detailed analysis using cDNA microarray gene expression profiling and quantitative Real-Time PCR, p21Cip1 (CDKN1A) and p15Ink4b (CDKN2B), that can elicit the G1/S checkpoint, were up-regulated, while genes that further determine entry from G1 to S-phase including E2F2, CYCLIN E2 (CCNE2), CDC25A and CDK2 were decreased in expression. Concomitant with decreased G1 to S-phase progression, decreased expression of CYCLIN A2 (CCNA2), CDC25C, CYCLIN B2 (CCNB2), CDC20 and CDC2 (CDK1), that regulate the passage of cells through G2/M were also demonstrated. Additional novel genes that are involved in stress response, and the response to DNA damage, not previously identified following termination of HH signaling in human cancer cells, include the early response genes DDIT2 (GADD45G), DDIT3 (GADD153), DDIT4 (REDD1), PPP1R15A (GADD34) and ATF3 that were significantly up-regulated. Genes involved in DNA synthesis and repair (TYMS, TOP2A, TK1, POLE, POLE2), and additional novel genes involved in S-phase progression or DNA damage responses that were significantly down-regulated, include KIAA0101 (p15 [PAF]), Replication Factor C variants 2, 3, 4, 5, CDT1, the E2F transcription factors CDCA4 and TFDP1, MDC1, FANCD2, PCNA, and the genes involved in DNA repair, RAD51C (XRCC3), RAD54B, RAD51 and HELLS. This study has therefore identified genes that are regulated during the termination of HH-dependent cellular proliferation and survival in colon cancer cells, and involves genes associated with G1/S-phase arrest, DNA damage and stress responses.

Results

GANT61 induces down-regulated expression of GLI genes and accumulation of human colon carcinoma cells at G1/S

In HT29 and GC3/c1 cells treated with GANT61 (20 µM) for up to 48 hr, expression of the target genes GLI1 and GLI2 were both down-regulated, and also the HH ligand receptor PTCH1, as determined by qRT-PCR (Figure 1A). Subsequently, HT29 or GC3/c1 cells were treated, in duplicate, with GANT61 (20 µM) followed by PI staining and flow cytometric analysis for the determination of cell cycle distribution between G1, S and G2/M phases (Figure 1B). In both cell lines, cells accumulated in G1, 24 hr after treatment with GANT61. In GANT61-treated HT29 cells, a 20% increase in G1-phase cells was associated with a corresponding decrease in cells within the G2/M phase (14%) and in S-phase (5%), consistent with a G1/S checkpoint arrest. In GC3/c1 cells, an 8% increase in G1-phase cells at 24 hr after GANT61 treatment also corresponded with a similar reduction in cells in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle (Figure 1B).
Figure 1

Expression of GLI1, GLI2, PTCH1 and cell cycle distribution of HT29 and GC3/c1 cells.

Cells were treated for up to 48 hr with GANT61 (20 µM) or with 0.2% DMSO (vehicle control). (A) qRT-PCR of GLI1, GLI2 and PTCH1 genes from time 0 to 48 hr. (B) DNA was extracted at 24 hr after treatment, stained with propidium iodide, and subsequently analyzed for the effects of inhibition of HH signaling on phase distribution of cells within the cell cycle by flow cytometry.

Expression of GLI1, GLI2, PTCH1 and cell cycle distribution of HT29 and GC3/c1 cells.

Cells were treated for up to 48 hr with GANT61 (20 µM) or with 0.2% DMSO (vehicle control). (A) qRT-PCR of GLI1, GLI2 and PTCH1 genes from time 0 to 48 hr. (B) DNA was extracted at 24 hr after treatment, stained with propidium iodide, and subsequently analyzed for the effects of inhibition of HH signaling on phase distribution of cells within the cell cycle by flow cytometry.

cDNA microarray analyses identify changes in gene expression both common and unique to HT29 and GC3/c1 following GANT61 treatment

To delineate the changes in gene expression in HT29 and GC3/c1 human colon carcinoma cell lines in response to treatment with the GLI1/GLI2 antagonist, GANT61, the expression of 18,401 human genes was profiled in control cells treated with vehicle (0.2% DMSO) and in cells treated with GANT61 (20 µM) for 24 hr. Genes with a False Discovery Rate (FDR)-adjusted p-value of <0.001 and fold change >1.5 were considered Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs) induced by GANT61 relative to the vehicle control, of which 1,368 genes were differentially expressed in HT29, and 1,002 genes in GC3/c1 cells (Figure 2). 755 genes or 558 genes were up-regulated, and 613 or 444 genes were down-regulated, in HT29 and GC3/c1 cells, respectively. 763 and 397 genes were differentially expressed and unique to HT29 or GC3/c1, respectively. Of the 763 DEGs unique to HT29, 459 (60%) were up-regulated and 304 (40%) were down-regulated. Similarly, of the 397 DEGs unique to GC3/c1, 262 (66%) were up-regulated and 135 (34%), down-regulated. In contrast, 605 genes representing 3.4% of all genes were differentially expressed that were common to both cell lines; of these, 296 were up-regulated (49%), and 309 (51%) were down-regulated (Figure 2). All genes common to both HT29 and GC3/c1 that were significantly up-regulated or down-regulated (p<0.001) are listed in Tables 1 and 2, respectively.
Figure 2

Venn diagram summarizing Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs) in GANT61-treated HT29 and GC3/c1 cells.

Cells were treated with GANT61 (20 µM) or vehicle alone (0.2% DMSO) for 24 hr, and total RNA extracted as described in Materials and Methods. Changes in gene expression were determined by cDNA microarray gene profiling using the Illumina Human-ref8 V3.0 Bead-Chip array. Genes with a False Discovery Rate (FDR)-adjusted p-value (p<0.001) and fold change >1.5 were considered DEGs. Upper panel: up-regulated genes. Lower panel: down-regulated genes. Differential expression for the total, unique up-regulated, unique down-regulated, common up-regulated, and common down-regulated DEGs, are shown.

Table 1

Up-regulated genes (p<0.001) common in GANT61-treated HT29 and GC3/c1 cells.

ACCESSION NUMBERGENE SYMBOLDEFINITIONFold ChangeACCESSION NUMBERGENE SYMBOLDEFINITIONFold Change
HT29GC3/c1HT29GC3/c1
NM_080489.3SDCBP2syndecan binding protein12.4210.83NM_001008213.1OPTNoptineurin2.632.37
NM_001042483.1NUPR1nuclear protein 17.963.53NM_000431.1MVKmevalonate kinase2.612.77
NM_021187.2CYP4F11cytochrome P4507.734.27NM_001550.2IFRD1interferon-related developmental regulator 12.601.84
NM_001001870.1C17orf91chromosome 17 open reading frame 916.793.82NM_025130.2HKDC1hexokinase domain containing 12.584.46
NM_004864.1GDF15growth differentiation factor 156.613.43NM_002461.1MVDmevalonate (diphospho) decarboxylase2.575.36
NM_004083.4DDIT3DNA-damage-inducible transcript 36.362.35NM_021626.1SCPEP1serine carboxypeptidase 12.551.79
NM_005130.3FGFBP1fibroblast growth factor binding protein 15.8641.19NM_012424.2RPS6KC1ribosomal protein S6 kinase2.532.03
NM_022060.2ABHD4abhydrolase domain containing 45.653.07NM_052839.2PANX2pannexin 22.535.61
NM_015526.1CLIP3CAP-GLY domain containing linker protein 35.252.74NM_021173.2POLD4polymerase (DNA-directed)2.511.71
NM_000389.2CDKN1Acyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A5.212.02NM_020400.4LPAR5lysophosphatidic acid receptor 52.502.17
NM_002298.2LCP1lymphocyte cytosolic protein 15.028.60NM_007075.3WDR45WD repeat domain 452.501.61
NM_019058.2DDIT4DNA-damage-inducible transcript 44.913.91NM_001909.3CTSDcathepsin D2.501.68
NM_031412.2GABARAPL1GABA(A) receptor-associated protein like 14.734.81NM_022157.2RRAGCRas-related GTP binding C2.482.80
NM_033285.2TP53INP1tumor protein p53 inducible nuclear protein 14.712.80NM_138573.2NRG4neuregulin 42.482.69
NM_001001342.1BLOC1S2biogenesis of lysosome-related organelles complex-14.683.95NM_201545.1LGALS8lectin2.462.81
NM_153282.1HYAL1hyaluronoglucosaminidase 14.5722.29NM_175738.3RAB37RAB37, member RAS oncogene family2.403.53
NM_012385.1P8p8 protein4.574.01NM_012257.3HBP1HMG-box transcription factor 12.401.65
NM_016061.1YPEL5yippee-like 54.393.98NM_001083617.1RB1CC1RB1-inducible coiled-coil 12.391.68
NM_145693.1LPIN1lipin 14.393.59NM_153341.1RNF19Bring finger protein 19B2.381.61
NM_019600.1KIAA1370KIAA13704.132.73NM_003129.3SQLEsqualene epoxidase2.383.03
NM_021009.3UBCubiquitin C4.087.52NM_018045.5BSDC1BSD domain containing 12.382.34
NM_002084.3GPX3glutathione peroxidase 34.052.99NM_003376.4VEGFAvascular endothelial growth factor A2.372.09
NM_003256.2TIMP4TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 44.042.02NM_007028.3TRIM31tripartite motif-containing 312.376.54
NM_198336.1INSIG1insulin induced gene 14.029.90NM_000527.2LDLRlow density lipoprotein receptor2.353.83
NM_002517.2NPAS1neuronal PAS domain protein 13.952.76NM_024717.3MCTP1multiple C2 domains, transmembrane 12.332.28
NM_001040619.1ATF3activating transcription factor 33.901.86NM_198833.1SERPINB8serpin peptidase inhibitor2.322.07
NM_006096.2NDRG1N-myc downstream regulated gene 13.892.63NM_023039.2ANKRA2ankyrin repeat, family A (RFXANK-like)2.311.82
NM_003670.1BHLHB2basic helix-loop-helix domain containing3.823.68NM_025047.1ARL14ADP-ribosylation factor-like 142.306.15
NM_002130.6HMGCS13-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-Coenzyme A synthase 13.756.54NM_001080391.1SP100SP100 nuclear antigen2.291.90
NR_003086.1HSD17B7P2hydroxysteroid (17-beta) dehydrogenase 7 pseudogene 23.742.83NM_002395.3ME1malic enzyme 12.292.31
NM_001013680.1LOC401233similar to HIV TAT specific factor 13.742.10NM_001360.2DHCR77-dehydrocholesterol reductase2.292.73
NM_006918.4SC5DLsterol-C5-desaturase3.683.41NM_032421.2CLIP2CAP-GLY domain containing linker protein 22.271.79
NM_182980.2OSGIN1oxidative stress induced growth inhibitor 13.554.48NM_014039.2C11orf54chromosome 11 open reading frame 542.271.62
NM_025182.2KIAA1539KIAA15393.492.62NM_017585.2SLC2A6solute carrier family 22.272.35
NM_018677.2ACSS2acyl-CoA synthetase short-chain family member 23.464.68NM_014330.2PPP1R15Aprotein phosphatase 12.261.63
NM_001034850.1FAM134Bfamily with sequence similarity 1343.441.90NM_145306.2C10orf35chromosome 10 open reading frame 352.262.19
NM_153742.3CTHcystathionase (cystathionine gamma-lyase)3.382.13NM_003831.3RIOK3RIO kinase 32.251.93
NM_021158.3TRIB3tribbles homolog 33.343.71NM_006997.2TACC2transforming, acidic coiled-coil containing protein 22.251.95
NM_000434.2NEU1sialidase 13.282.00NM_001006932.1RPS6KA2ribosomal protein S6 kinase2.241.68
NM_001005404.3YPEL2yippee-like 23.222.40NM_000574.2CD55CD55 molecule2.231.84
NM_004508.2IDI1isopentenyl-diphosphate delta isomerase 13.214.78NM_018310.2BRF2subunit of RNA polymerase III transcription initiation factor2.232.14
NM_003151.2STAT4signal transducer and activator of transcription 43.183.85NM_001491.2GCNT2glucosaminyl (N-acetyl) transferase 22.224.08
NM_005165.2ALDOCaldolase C3.162.44NM_003567.2BCAR3breast cancer anti-estrogen resistance 32.211.79
NM_014331.3SLC7A11solute carrier family 73.162.54NM_005488.1TOM1target of myb12.201.89
NM_000104.2CYP1B1cytochrome P4503.152.41NM_004462.3FDFT1farnesyl-diphosphate farnesyltransferase 12.192.73
NM_002340.3LSSlanosterol synthase3.143.15NM_019116.2UBFD1ubiquitin family domain containing 12.191.90
NM_078487.2CDKN2Bcyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2B3.132.13NM_007105.1SLC22A18ASsolute carrier family 222.181.81
NM_002201.4ISG20interferon stimulated exonuclease gene 20kDa3.121.91NM_182491.1ZFAND2Azinc finger2.172.17
NM_016315.2GULP1GULP, engulfment adaptor PTB domain containing 13.114.39NM_181785.2SLC46A3solute carrier family 462.172.00
NM_017983.4WIPI1WD repeat domain3.092.40NM_024866.4ADM2adrenomedullin 22.161.77
NM_024165.1PHF1PHD finger protein 13.072.42NM_021133.2RNASELribonuclease L2.152.28
NM_001995.2ACSL1acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 13.062.86NM_032548.2ABTB1ankyrin repeat and BTB (POZ) domain containing 12.141.58
NM_004354.1CCNG2cyclin G23.052.64NM_002153.1HSD17B2hydroxysteroid (17-beta) dehydrogenase 22.142.98
NM_020739.2CCPG1cell cycle progression 13.041.88NM_006033.2LIPGlipase2.132.86
NM_001017369.1SC4MOLsterol-C4-methyl oxidase-like3.034.04NM_020919.2ALS2amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 22.111.77
NM_001031744.1LOC158160hypothetical protein LOC1581603.022.35NM_014701.2KIAA0256KIAA0256 gene product2.112.30
NM_032409.2PINK1PTEN induced putative kinase 12.982.44NM_001222.2CAMK2Gcalcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase2.112.12
NM_003811.2TNFSF9tumor necrosis factor (ligand) superfamily2.983.04NM_015271.2TRIM2tripartite motif-containing 22.111.79
NM_002357.2MXD1MAX dimerization protein 12.932.30NM_174936.2PCSK9proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 92.114.18
NM_000777.2CYP3A5cytochrome P4502.921.77NM_015713.3RRM2Bribonucleotide reductase M2 B2.101.66
NM_001098500.1KIAA1217KIAA12172.883.16NM_005749.2TOB1transducer of ERBB22.091.58
NM_022119.3PRSS22protease2.843.27NM_004419.3DUSP5dual specificity phosphatase 52.083.61
NM_004669.2CLIC3Homo sapiens chloride intracellular channel 32.806.19NM_033028.2BBS4Bardet-Biedl syndrome 42.082.04
NM_080491.1GAB2GRB2-associated binding protein 22.792.06NM_001286.2CLCN6chloride channel 62.072.18
NM_178270.1ATG4AATG4 autophagy related 4 homolog A2.791.92XM_001132495.1SLC26A11PREDICTED:solute carrier family 262.071.87
NM_002770.2PRSS2protease, serine, 2 (trypsin 2)2.791.64NM_172070.2ZNF650zinc finger protein 6502.071.90
NM_182608.2ANKRD33ankyrin repeat domain 332.741.91NM_004567.2PFKFB46-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-22.071.93
NM_006705.2GADD45Ggrowth arrest and DNA-damage-inducible2.743.01NM_002555.3SLC22A18solute carrier family 222.061.62
NM_012326.2MAPRE3microtubule-associated protein2.732.16NM_001010990.1HERPUD1homocysteine-inducible, ubiquitin-like domain member 12.061.63
NM_001013251.1SLC3A2solute carrier family 32.722.40NM_198867.1ALKBH6alkB, alkylation repair homolog 62.061.65
NM_016243.2CYB5R1cytochrome b5 reductase 12.722.52NM_000271.3NPC1Niemann-Pick disease2.052.18
NM_198129.1LAMA3laminin2.653.36NM_006454.2MXD4MAX dimerization protein 42.051.80
NM_000228.2LAMB3laminin2.652.27NM_021194.2SLC30A1solute carrier family 302.031.73
NM_006608.1PHTF1putative homeodomain transcription factor 12.642.38NM_173843.1IL1RNinterleukin 1 receptor antagonist2.0310.01
NM_021229.3NTN4netrin 42.032.47NM_152271.3LONRF1LON peptidase N-terminal domain and ring finger 11.723.04
NM_002064.1GLRXglutaredoxin2.031.75NM_003314.1TTC1tetratricopeptide repeat domain 11.721.55
NM_005896.2IDH1isocitrate dehydrogenase 12.022.37NM_005920.2MEF2Dmyocyte enhancer factor 2D1.711.85
NM_144498.1OSBPL2oxysterol binding protein-like 22.011.81NM_016410.2CHMP5chromatin modifying protein 51.712.14
NM_005115.3MVPmajor vault protein1.991.82NM_001748.3CAPN2calpain 21.702.16
NM_023938.4C1orf116chromosome 1 open reading frame 1161.983.06NM_004344.1CETN2centrin1.701.54
NM_024311.2MFSD11major facilitator superfamily domain containing 111.981.80NM_177947.2ARMCX3armadillo repeat containing, X-linked 31.701.76
NM_004433.3ELF3E74-like factor 31.973.72NM_000158.2GBE1glucan1.691.73
NM_031229.2RBCK1RanBP-type and C3HC4-type zinc finger containing 11.974.21NM_052873.1C14orf179chromosome 14 open reading frame 1791.691.52
NM_005564.3LCN2lipocalin 21.974.19NM_020310.2MNTMAX binding protein1.691.51
NM_002956.2CLIP1CAP-GLY domain containing linker protein 11.961.62NM_015367.2BCL2L13BCL2-like 131.691.88
NM_005562.1LAMC2laminin, gamma 21.962.01NM_001005474.1NFKBIZnuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer1.691.72
NM_000332.2ATXN1ataxin 11.961.86NM_021202.1TP53INP2tumor protein p53 inducible nuclear protein 21.691.89
NM_001206.2KLF9Kruppel-like factor 91.962.19NM_138448.2ACYP2acylphosphatase 21.682.03
NM_173359.3EIF4E3eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E family member 31.952.01NM_003729.1RTCD1RNA terminal phosphate cyclase domain 11.671.61
NM_003565.1ULK1unc-51-like kinase 11.951.57NM_030912.2TRIM8tripartite motif-containing 81.671.70
NM_012161.2FBXL5F-box and leucine-rich repeat protein 51.952.27NM_018202.3TMEM57transmembrane protein 571.671.88
NM_001079864.1TAX1BP1Tax1 (human T-cell leukemia virus type I) binding protein 11.931.66NM_018297.2NGLY1N-glycanase 11.661.68
NM_005063.4SCDstearoyl-CoA desaturase1.934.44NM_183399.1RNF14ring finger protein 141.661.87
NM_145279.4MOBKL2CMOB1, Mps One Binder kinase activator-like 2C1.922.58NM_032357.2CCDC115coiled-coil domain containing 1151.661.63
NM_004055.4CAPN5calpain 51.912.05NM_172037.2RDH10retinol dehydrogenase 101.662.20
NM_175932.1PSMD13proteasome (prosome, macropain) 26S subunit1.912.14NM_012287.3CENTB2centaurin1.651.62
NM_002885.1RAP1GAPRAP1 GTPase activating protein1.912.02NM_018178.3GOLPH3Lgolgi phosphoprotein 3-like1.651.64
NM_145245.2EVI5Lecotropic viral integration site 5-like1.901.69NM_025147.3COQ10Bcoenzyme Q10 homolog B1.641.54
NM_021242.3MID1IP1MID1 interacting protein 11.891.78NM_006285.2TESK1testis-specific kinase 11.641.61
NM_006503.2PSMC4proteasome (prosome, macropain) 26S subunit1.892.16NM_001018102.1GRINL1Aglutamate receptor1.641.92
NM_005975.2PTK6protein tyrosine kinase 61.881.97NM_005476.3GNEglucosamine (UDP-N-acetyl)-2-epimerase1.642.98
NM_207304.1MBNL2muscleblind-like 21.881.63NR_002204.1FTHL11ferritin, heavy polypeptide-like 11 on chromosome 81.631.79
NM_000859.1HMGCR3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-Coenzyme A reductase1.882.46NM_053067.1UBQLN1ubiquilin 11.631.56
NM_021021.2SNTB1syntrophin1.881.64NM_005895.3GOLGA3golgi autoantigen1.631.58
NM_032667.4BSCL2Bernardinelli-Seip congenital lipodystrophy 21.871.73NM_037370.1CCNDBP1cyclin D-type binding-protein 11.631.50
NM_006022.2TSC22D1TSC22 domain family1.872.40NM_001042430.1FAM164Cfamily with sequence similarity 1641.622.01
NM_012478.3WBP2WW domain binding protein 21.871.67NM_004751.1GCNT3glucosaminyl (N-acetyl) transferase 31.623.99
NM_031476.2CRISPLD2cysteine-rich secretory protein LCCL domain containing 21.872.57NM_004428.2EFNA1ephrin-A11.612.10
NM_017921.1NPLOC4nuclear protein localization 4 homolog1.871.74NM_007193.3ANXA10annexin A101.612.36
NM_015508.3TIPARPTCDD-inducible poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase1.861.75NM_018180.2DHX32DEAH (Asp-Glu-Ala-His) box polypeptide 321.611.52
NM_001376.2DYNC1H1dynein, cytoplasmic 1, heavy chain 11.861.50NM_020202.2NIT2nitrilase family1.611.62
NM_144693.1ZNF558zinc finger protein 5581.861.98NM_032169.4ACAD11acyl-Coenzyme A dehydrogenase family1.611.73
NM_003344.2UBE2Hubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2H1.852.04NM_147223.2NCOA1nuclear receptor coactivator 11.601.57
NM_152528.1WDSUB1WD repeat, sterile alpha motif and U-box domain containing 11.851.74NM_002203.3ITGA2integrin1.592.49
NM_001225.3CASP4caspase 4, apoptosis-related cysteine peptidase1.851.97NM_018317.1TBC1D19TBC1 domain family1.592.18
NM_001512.2GSTA4glutathione S-transferase A41.842.45NM_002061.2GCLMglutamate-cysteine ligase1.592.06
NM_020299.3AKR1B10aldo-keto reductase family 11.832.42NM_019007.3ARMCX6armadillo repeat containing, X-linked 61.581.81
NM_016143.3NSFL1CNSFL1 (p97) cofactor (p47)1.832.61NM_015974.2CRYL1crystallin, lambda 11.581.51
NM_080655.1C9orf30chromosome 9 open reading frame 301.831.77NM_006149.2LGALS4lectin1.583.12
NM_001018109.1PIRpirin1.832.67NM_012233.1RAB3GAP1RAB3 GTPase activating protein subunit 11.571.78
NR_002200.1FTHL2ferritin, heavy polypeptide-like 2 on chromosome 11.831.62NM_002808.3PSMD2proteasome (prosome, macropain) 26S subunit1.571.72
NM_005485.3PARP3poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase family1.821.77NM_001030001.1RPS29ribosomal protein S291.571.61
NM_058172.3ANTXR2anthrax toxin receptor 21.821.88NM_052849.2CCDC32coiled-coil domain containing 321.571.55
NR_002166.1SEDLPspondyloepiphyseal dysplasia, late, pseudogene1.811.88NM_015484.4SYF2SYF2 homolog1.571.64
NM_022449.1RAB17member RAS oncogene family1.801.64NM_001093771.1TXNRD1thioredoxin reductase 11.571.54
NM_198310.2TTC8tetratricopeptide repeat domain 81.801.83NM_017707.2ASAP3ArfGAP with SH3 domain, ankyrin repeat and PH domain 31.571.59
NM_002786.2PSMA1proteasome (prosome, macropain) subunit1.792.54NM_020412.3CHMP1Bchromatin modifying protein 1B1.561.83
NM_002796.2PSMB4proteasome (prosome, macropain) subunit1.781.53NM_017549.3EPDR1ependymin related protein 11.561.52
NR_002201.1FTHL3Pferritin1.782.10NM_001080493.2ZNF823zinc finger protein 8231.561.56
NM_020225.1STOX2storkhead box 21.785.98NM_001008738.2FNIP1folliculin interacting protein 11.561.50
NM_080725.1SRXN1sulfiredoxin 1 homolog1.781.67NM_006343.2MERTKc-mer proto-oncogene tyrosine kinase1.562.12
NM_015946.4PELOpelota homolog1.771.58NM_014851.2KLHL21kelch-like 211.562.02
NM_020751.1COG6component of oligomeric golgi complex 61.771.60NM_002803.2PSMC2proteasome1.551.77
NM_001080538.1LOC441282similar to aldo-keto reductase family 11.772.31NM_145918.2CTSL1cathepsin L11.551.96
NM_004487.3GOLGB1golgin B11.761.82NM_003846.1PEX11Bperoxisomal biogenesis factor 11 beta1.551.92
NM_145040.2PRKCDBPprotein kinase C1.763.27NM_014905.2GLSglutaminase1.552.21
NM_201557.2FHL2four and a half LIM domains 21.761.74NM_016154.3RAB4Bmember RAS oncogene family1.552.22
NM_015037.2KIAA0913KIAA09131.751.52NM_052901.2SLC25A25solute carrier family 251.541.55
NM_003003.2SEC14L1SEC14-like 11.741.94NM_033212.2CCDC102Acoiled-coil domain containing 102A1.541.75
NM_001031835.1PHKBphosphorylase kinase1.741.63NM_002799.2PSMB7proteasome (prosome, macropain) subunit1.541.56
NM_016470.6C20orf111chromosome 20 open reading frame 1111.741.54NM_001031716.1OBFC2Aoligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding fold containing 2A1.531.60
NM_001080791.1C15orf57chromosome 15 open reading frame 571.741.63NM_015187.3KIAA0746KIAA0746 protein1.531.62
NM_002541.2OGDHoxoglutarate (alpha-ketoglutarate) dehydrogenase1.741.55NM_004034.1ANXA7annexin A71.521.75
NM_015922.1NSDHLNAD(P) dependent steroid dehydrogenase-like1.742.30NM_002815.2PSMD11proteasome (prosome, macropain) 26S subunit1.521.71
XM_001128220.1PLEKHM1pleckstrin homology domain containing, family M member 11.731.73NM_014889.2PITRM1pitrilysin metallopeptidase 11.522.15
NM_004417.2DUSP1dual specificity phosphatase 11.731.78NM_007126.2VCPvalosin-containing protein1.511.79
NM_003971.3SPAG9sperm associated antigen 91.731.80NM_032017.1STK40serine/threonine kinase 401.501.66
NM_016026.2RDH11retinol dehydrogenase 111.721.67NM_032776.1JMJD1Cjumonji domain containing 1C1.501.81
Table 2

Down-regulated genes (p<0.001) common in GANT61-treated HT29 and GC3/c1 cells.

ACCESSION NUMBERGENE SYMBOLDEFINITIONFold ChangeACCESSION NUMBERGENE SYMBOLDEFINITIONFold Change
HT29GC3/c1HT29GC3/c1
NM_015086.1DDNdendrin−6.81−2.37NM_014791.2MELKmaternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase−2.50−2.09
NM_001013653.2LRRC26leucine rich repeat containing 26−4.77−2.23NM_016343.3CENPFcentromere protein F, 350/400ka−2.50−2.71
NM_004091.2E2F2E2F transcription factor 2−4.23−2.26NM_001789.2CDC25Acell division cycle 25 homolog A−2.50−2.45
NM_182687.1PKMYT1protein kinase, membrane associated tyrosine/threonine 1−4.17−4.81NM_024037.1C1orf135chromosome 1 open reading frame 135−2.49−2.12
NM_001013653.1LOC389816cytokeratin associated protein−3.85−2.32NM_017669.2ERCC6Lexcision repair cross-complementing rodent repair deficiency−2.48−3.22
NM_020675.3SPC25NDC80 kinetochore complex component, homolog−3.51−7.19NM_031965.2GSG2germ cell associated 2 (haspin)-2.47−2.79
NM_005733.1KIF20Akinesin family member 20A−3.45−2.21NM_018186.2C1orf112chromosome 1 open reading frame 112−2.47−1.88
NM_002263.2KIFC1kinesin family member C1−3.36−2.74NM_001786.2CDC2cell division cycle 2, G1 to S and G2 to M−2.47−2.63
NM_006681.1NMUneuromedin U−3.33−3.15NM_002105.2H2AFXH2A histone family, member X−2.46−2.86
NM_014783.2ARHGAP11ARho GTPase activating protein 11A−3.33−3.46NM_018492.2PBKPDZ binding kinase−2.46−2.21
NM_006176.1NRGNneurogranin−3.29−4.20NM_198516.1GALNTL4UDP-N-acetyl-alpha-D-galactosamine−2.46−1.82
NM_016095.1GINS2GINS complex subunit 2−3.25−4.51NM_018685.2ANLNanillin, actin binding protein−2.46−2.44
NM_018063.3HELLShelicase, lymphoid-specific−3.24−3.42NM_002915.3RFC3replication factor C (activator 1) 3, 38kDa−2.45−2.59
NM_057735.1CCNE2cyclin E2−3.22−3.24NM_007370.3RFC5replication factor C (activator 1) 5, 36.5kDa−2.43−2.28
NM_014750.3DLG7discs, large homolog 7−3.21−2.48NM_001032290.1PSRC1proline/serine-rich coiled-coil 1−2.43−2.53
NM_001168.2BIRC5baculoviral IAP repeat-containing 5−3.18−2.79NM_000057.2BLMBloom syndrome−2.43−3.28
NM_001255.2CDC20cell division cycle 20 homolog−3.12−2.46NM_012484.1HMMRhyaluronan-mediated motility receptor−2.43−1.82
NM_001237.2CCNA2cyclin A2−3.11−3.01NM_145701.1CDCA4cell division cycle associated 4−2.43−2.26
NM_144508.3CASC5cancer susceptibility candidate 5−3.09−2.13NM_024339.2THOC6THO complex 6 homolog−2.41−1.74
NM_017611.2SLC43A3solute carrier family 43, member 3−3.05−2.60NM_003258.2TK1thymidine kinase 1−2.41−3.74
NM_018154.2ASF1BASF1 anti-silencing function 1 homolog B−3.03−3.06NM_182776.1MCM7minichromosome maintenance complex component 7−2.39−2.54
NM_018410.3HJURPHolliday junction recognition protein−3.02−3.18NM_178448.2C9orf140chromosome 9 open reading frame 140−2.39−2.34
NM_004217.2AURKBaurora kinase B−3.01−3.19NM_001067.2TOP2Atopoisomerase (DNA) II alpha 170kDa−2.39−3.16
NM_002692.2POLE2polymerase (DNA directed), epsilon 2 (p59 subunit)−3.01−3.00NM_178014.2TUBBtubulin, beta−2.37−2.27
NM_018101.2CDCA8cell division cycle associated 8−2.97−2.85NM_018193.2FANCIFanconi anemia, complementation group I−2.37−2.52
NM_002875.2RAD51RAD51 homolog−2.95−2.66NM_206833.2CTXN1cortexin 1−2.36−2.04
NM_031299.3CDCA3cell division cycle associated 3−2.94−2.82NM_031966.2CCNB1cyclin B1−2.36−2.28
NM_181803.1UBE2Cubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2C−2.91−2.80NM_005483.2CHAF1Achromatin assembly factor 1, subunit A (p150)−2.36−2.21
NM_001100118.1XRCC3X-ray repair complementing defective repair 3−2.90−3.66NM_005518.2HMGCS23-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-Coenzyme A synthase 2−2.35−2.88
NM_025049.2PIF1PIF1 5′-to-3′ DNA helicase homolog−2.90−2.87NM_019013.1FAM64Afamily with sequence similarity 64−2.35−3.13
NM_030928.2CDT1chromatin licensing and DNA replication factor 1−2.86−2.76NM_002129.2HMGB2high-mobility group box 2−2.35−2.18
NM_016556.1PSMC3IPPSMC3 interacting protein−2.85−3.47NM_001034194.1EXOSC9exosome component 9−2.34−1.69
NM_182746.1MCM4minichromosome maintenance complex component 4−2.84−2.97NM_031423.3NUF2NDC80 kinetochore complex component, homolog−2.34−2.48
NM_016937.2POLA1polymerase (DNA directed), alpha 1, catalytic subunit−2.84−2.19NM_002916.3RFC4replication factor C (activator 1) 4, 37kDa−2.33−2.36
NM_007086.2WDHD1WD repeat and HMG-box DNA binding protein 1−2.80−2.53NM_004111.4FEN1flap structure-specific endonuclease 1−2.33−1.97
NM_001761.1CCNFcyclin F−2.80−2.77NM_145061.3C13orf3chromosome 13 open reading frame 3−2.33−2.53
NM_012177.2FBXO5F-box protein 5−2.78−2.95NM_001012413.1SGOL1shugoshin-like 1−2.33−2.85
NM_018518.3MCM10minichromosome maintenance complex component 10−2.78−4.01NM_207418.2GCUD2gastric cancer up-regulated-2−2.32−2.28
NM_003579.2RAD54LRAD54-like−2.76−2.98NM_199413.1PRC1protein regulator of cytokinesis 1−2.32−2.13
NM_020242.1KIF15kinesin family member 15−2.75−3.00NM_006461.3SPAG5sperm associated antigen 5−2.31−1.92
NM_004336.2BUB1BUB1 budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 1 homolog−2.74−2.47NM_080668.2CDCA5cell division cycle associated 5−2.29−2.94
NM_003384.2VRK1vaccinia related kinase 1−2.73−1.89NM_006101.1NDC80NDC80 homolog−2.29−3.12
NM_018454.5NUSAP1nucleolar and spindle associated protein 1−2.72−2.40NM_001012507.1C6orf173chromosome 6 open reading frame 173−2.29−2.38
NM_001034.1RRM2ribonucleotide reductase M2 polypeptide−2.72−2.54NM_002497.2NEK2NIMA (never in mitosis gene a)-related kinase 2−2.29−2.10
NM_012112.4TPX2microtubule-associated, homolog−2.72−2.32NM_024900.3PHF17PHD finger protein 17−2.28−1.67
NM_152259.3C15orf42chromosome 15 open reading frame 42−2.70−3.44NM_001040668.1BCL2L12BCL2-like 12−2.28−1.93
NM_001042426.1CENPAcentromere protein A−2.70−3.28NM_014264.3PLK4polo-like kinase 4−2.27−1.97
NM_012415.2RAD54BRAD54 homolog B−2.69−1.88NM_022809.2CDC25Ccell division cycle 25 homolog C−2.27−2.05
NM_181471.1RFC2replication factor C (activator 1) 2, 40kDa−2.69−2.50NM_152515.2CKAP2Lcytoskeleton associated protein 2-like−2.26−2.29
NM_005480.2TROAPtrophinin associated protein−2.69−2.49NM_006026.2H1FXH1 histone family, member X−2.24−2.08
NM_006845.2KIF2Ckinesin family member 2C−2.68−2.81NM_003276.1TMPOthymopoietin−2.24−1.95
NM_022346.3NCAPGnon-SMC condensin I complex−2.68−2.70NM_018136.3ASPMasp (abnormal spindle) homolog−2.23−2.51
NM_004260.2RECQL4RecQ protein-like 4−2.68−3.00NM_016426.4GTSE1G-2 and S-phase expressed 1−2.23−2.44
NM_003318.3TTKTTK protein kinase−2.67−2.40NM_014875.1KIF14kinesin family member 14−2.23−2.12
NM_030919.2FAM83Dfamily with sequence similarity 83, member D−2.66−2.08NM_014109.2ATAD2ATPase family, AAA domain containing 2−2.23−2.21
NM_001254.3CDC6cell division cycle 6 homolog−2.66−3.05NM_003390.2WEE1WEE1 homolog−2.22−1.97
NM_001034836.1RDM1RAD52 motif 1−2.65−2.65NM_002388.3MCM3minichromosome maintenance complex component 3−2.22−2.45
NM_004526.2MCM2minichromosome maintenance complex component 2−2.65−3.43NM_005030.3PLK1polo-like kinase 1−2.22−2.37
NM_004701.2CCNB2cyclin B2−2.65−2.52NM_005375.2MYBv-myb myeloblastosis viral oncogene homolog−2.22−2.01
NM_032818.2C9orf100chromosome 9 open reading frame 100−2.64−2.30NM_024789.3TMEM180transmembrane protein 180−2.20−1.63
NM_006397.2RNASEH2Aribonuclease H2, subunit A−2.64−2.52NM_001012716.1C18orf56chromosome 18 open reading frame 56−2.20−2.30
NM_014736.4KIAA0101KIAA0101−2.61−3.47NM_017760.5NCAPG2non-SMC condensin II complex, subunit G2−2.20−2.11
NM_004219.2PTTG1pituitary tumor-transforming 1−2.61−2.23NM_005192.2CDKN3cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 3−2.20−1.98
NM_182513.1SPC24SPC24, NDC80 kinetochore complex component, homolog−2.61−3.15NM_006231.2POLEpolymerase (DNA directed)−2.19−3.53
NM_198948.1NUDT1nudix (nucleoside diphosphate linked moiety X)-type motif 1−2.59−3.09NM_018124.3RFWD3ring finger and WD repeat domain 3−2.19−1.56
NM_033286.2C15orf23chromosome 15 open reading frame 23−2.58−1.77NM_006088.5TUBB2Ctubulin, beta 2C−2.19−1.63
NM_024053.3CENPMcentromere protein M−2.57−3.45NM_198434.1AURKAaurora kinase A−2.18−1.68
NM_006479.3RAD51AP1RAD51 associated protein 1−2.57−2.54NM_007280.1OIP5Opa interacting protein 5−2.18−2.34
NM_006739.3MCM5minichromosome maintenance complex component 5−2.56−3.21NM_014176.2UBE2Tubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2T (putative).−2.15−2.01
NM_203401.1STMN1stathmin 1/oncoprotein 18−2.56−2.32NM_199420.3POLQpolymerase (DNA directed), theta−2.14−2.45
NM_013277.2RACGAP1Rac GTPase activating protein 1−2.55−1.79NM_001211.4BUB1BBUB1 budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 1 homolog beta−2.13−2.23
NM_001005413.1ZWINTZW10 interactor−2.55−2.64NM_001025248.1DUTdeoxyuridine triphosphatase−2.13−2.36
NM_004856.4KIF23kinesin family member 23−2.54−2.17NM_031217.2KIF18Akinesin family member 18A−2.13−1.99
NM_004523.2KIF11kinesin family member 11−2.53−2.12NM_025108.2C16orf59chromosome 16 open reading frame 59−2.12−3.48
NR_002734.1PTTG3pituitary tumor-transforming 3−2.53−2.43NM_001042517.1DIAPH3diaphanous homolog 3−2.12−2.34
NM_006027.3EXO1exonuclease 1−2.52−3.86NM_017998.1C9orf40chromosome 9 open reading frame 40−2.11−1.85
NM_016448.1DTLdenticleless homolog−2.51−3.12NM_052844.3WDR34WD repeat domain 34−2.11−2.71
NM_022770.2GINS3GINS complex subunit 3 (Psf3 homolog)−2.10−1.65NM_017918.3CCDC109Bcoiled-coil domain containing 109B−1.84−1.84
NM_003503.2CDC7cell division cycle 7 homolog−2.09−1.97NM_005782.2THOC4THO complex 4−1.84−1.63
NM_001071.1TYMSthymidylate synthetase−2.08−3.41NM_003035.2STILSCL/TAL1 interrupting locus−1.84−1.95
NM_005441.2CHAF1Bchromatin assembly factor 1, subunit B (p60)−2.08−2.25NM_005342.2HMGB3high-mobility group box 3−1.83−1.60
NM_014865.2NCAPD2non-SMC condensin I complex, subunit D2−2.07−2.03NM_018132.3CENPQcentromere protein Q−1.83−2.10
NM_001798.2CDK2cyclin-dependent kinase 2−2.07−1.88NM_024516.2C16orf53chromosome 16 open reading frame 53−1.81−1.86
NM_022720.5DGCR8DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 8−2.07−1.57NM_015895.3GMNNgeminin, DNA replication inhibitor−1.81−1.87
NM_145018.2C11orf82chromosome 11 open reading frame 82−2.06−2.28NM_002689.2POLA2polymerase (DNA directed), alpha 2 (70kD subunit)−1.81−2.11
NM_016195.2KIF20Bkinesin family member 20B−2.06−1.63NM_000154.1GALK1galactokinase 1−1.80−1.84
NM_001008393.1LOC201725hypothetical protein−2.05−1.98NM_004499.3HNRNPABheterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A/B−1.80−2.31
NM_000465.1BARD1BRCA1 associated RING domain 1−2.05−2.42NM_024656.2GLT25D1glycosyltransferase 25 domain containing 1−1.80−1.62
NM_003173.2SUV39H1suppressor of variegation 3-9 homolog 1−2.05−1.89NM_199250.1C19orf48chromosome 19 open reading frame 48−1.79−1.83
NM_015426.2WDR51AWD repeat domain 51A−2.05−1.60NM_153329.2ALDH16A1aldehyde dehydrogenase 16 family, member A1−1.79−1.98
NM_020342.1SLC39A10solute carrier family 39−2.05−3.15NM_032637.2SKP2S-phase kinase-associated protein 2 (p45)−1.79−2.00
NM_144999.2LRRC45leucine rich repeat containing 45−2.04−3.33NM_006191.2PA2G4proliferation-associated 2G4, 38kDa−1.78−1.84
NM_000946.2PRIM1primase, DNA, polypeptide 1 (49kDa)−2.04−2.29NM_001033580.1MYO19myosin XIX−1.78−3.61
NM_016183.3MRTO4turnover 4 homolog−2.04−1.68NM_017915.2C12orf48chromosome 12 open reading frame 48−1.78−1.92
NM_017518.5UCHL5IPUCHL5 interacting protein−2.04−1.75NM_003362.2UNGuracil-DNA glycosylase−1.76−1.55
NM_020394.2ZNF695zinc finger protein 695−2.03−2.78NM_014985.2CEP152centrosomal protein 152kDa−1.75−2.37
NM_203394.2E2F7E2F transcription factor 7−2.02−2.03NM_001333.2CTSL2cathepsin L2−1.75−1.70
NM_173529.3C18orf54chromosome 18 open reading frame 54−2.02−1.99NM_016310.2POLR3Kpolymerase (RNA) III (DNA directed) polypeptide K, 12.3 kDa−1.75−1.59
NM_000156.4GAMTguanidinoacetate N-methyltransferase−2.02−1.64NM_006406.1PRDX4peroxiredoxin 4−1.74−1.93
NM_007299.2BRCA1breast cancer 1, early onset−2.02−2.11NM_005484.2PARP2poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase family, member 2−1.74−1.53
NM_014641.1MDC1mediator of DNA damage checkpoint 1−2.01−1.57NM_001039091.1PRPS2phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate synthetase 2−1.73−1.60
NM_032485.4MCM8minichromosome maintenance complex component 8−2.01−3.18NM_015703.3RRP7Aribosomal RNA processing 7 homolog A−1.73−1.71
NM_024660.2TMEM149transmembrane protein 149−2.01−2.07NM_015032.1PDS5BPDS5, regulator of cohesion maintenance, homolog B−1.73−1.78
NM_015414.2RPL36ribosomal protein L36−2.00−2.40NM_000992.2RPL29ribosomal protein L29−1.73−2.53
NM_021734.3SLC25A19solute carrier family 25, member 19−2.00−1.67NM_173608.1C14orf80chromosome 14 open reading frame 80−1.72−1.73
NM_003504.3CDC45LCDC45 cell division cycle 45-like−2.00−2.84NM_001042550.1SMC2structural maintenance of chromosomes 2−1.72−1.92
NM_014708.3KNTC1kinetochore associated 1−1.99−1.86NM_014285.4EXOSC2exosome component 2−1.72−1.70
NM_018131.3CEP55centrosomal protein 55kDa−1.98−2.01NM_138961.1ESAMendothelial cell adhesion molecule−1.71−2.21
NM_007243.1NRMnurim−1.98−2.22NM_145159.1JAG2jagged 2−1.70−1.89
NM_003517.2HIST2H2AChistone cluster 2, H2ac−1.98−2.54NM_006392.2NOL5Anucleolar protein 5A (56kDa with KKE/D repeat)−1.69−1.70
NM_001002800.1SMC4structural maintenance of chromosomes 4−1.98−1.94NM_033661.3WDR4WD repeat domain 4−1.69−1.84
NM_001033505.1CSTF3cleavage stimulation factor, 3′ pre-RNA, subunit 3, 77kD−1.97−1.96NM_032358.2CCDC77coiled-coil domain containing 77−1.68−1.54
NM_181716.2PRR6proline rich 6−1.96−1.85NM_018693.2FBXO11F-box protein 11−1.68−1.93
NM_018663.1PXMP2peroxisomal membrane protein 2, 22kDa−1.96−2.02NM_001026.3RPS24ribosomal protein S24−1.68−1.94
NM_005915.4MCM6minichromosome maintenance complex component 6−1.96−2.25NM_016292.1TRAP1TNF receptor-associated protein 1−1.67−1.51
NM_005189.1CBX2chromobox homolog 2−1.96−1.68NM_017613.2DONSONdownstream neighbor of SON−1.66−1.61
NM_001379.1DNMT1DNA (cytosine-5-)-methyltransferase 1−1.96−1.84NM_006047.4RBM12RNA binding motif protein 12−1.66−1.91
NM_001002018.1HCFC1R1host cell factor C1 regulator 1 (XPO1 dependent)−1.96−1.79NM_012140.3SLC25A10solute carrier family 25 (dicarboxylate transporter), member 10−1.66−1.55
NM_000234.1LIG1ligase I, DNA, ATP-dependent−1.96−2.81NM_001025238.1TSPAN4tetraspanin 4−1.66−1.94
NM_138443.2CCDC5coiled-coil domain containing 5 (spindle associated)−1.95−1.68NM_001008735.1HMG1L1high-mobility group (nonhistone chromosomal) protein 1-like 1−1.66−1.62
NM_020315.4PDXPpyridoxal (pyridoxine, vitamin B6) phosphatase−1.95−2.04NM_005956.2MTHFD1methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase (NADP+dependent) 1−1.65−1.69
NM_032117.2MND1meiotic nuclear divisions 1 homolog−1.95−2.63NM_145014.1HYLS1hydrolethalus syndrome 1−1.65−1.62
NM_194255.1SLC19A1solute carrier family 19 (folate transporter), member 1−1.95−1.93NM_004309.3ARHGDIARho GDP dissociation inhibitor (GDI) alpha−1.64−1.75
NM_058216.1RAD51CRAD51 homolog C−1.94−2.13NM_182649.1PCNAproliferating cell nuclear antigen−1.63−1.99
NM_018725.3IL17RBinterleukin 17 receptor B−1.94−2.25NM_032118.2WDR54WD repeat domain 54−1.63−1.77
NM_024844.3NUP85nucleoporin 85kDa−1.93−1.53NM_015697.6COQ2coenzyme Q2 homolog−1.63−1.85
NM_015190.3DNAJC9DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily C, member 9−1.93−1.64NM_032982.2CASP2caspase 2−1.63−1.67
NM_004237.2TRIP13thyroid hormone receptor interactor 13−1.93−2.23NM_001042762.1FIGNL1fidgetin-like 1−1.63−1.85
NM_000179.1MSH6mutS homolog 6−1.93−1.83NM_001100417.1UBR7ubiquitin protein ligase E3 component n-recognin 7 (putative)−1.61−1.64
NM_001009936.1PHF19PHD finger protein 19−1.93−2.42NM_003146.2SSRP1structure specific recognition protein 1−1.60−1.66
NM_003609.2HIRIP3HIRA interacting protein 3−1.92−2.01NM_152308.1C16orf75chromosome 16 open reading frame 75−1.60−1.99
NM_022145.3CENPKcentromere protein K−1.92−2.25NM_001024662.1RPL6ribosomal protein L6−1.60−1.56
NM_022908.1NT5DC25′-nucleotidase domain containing 2−1.92−1.81NM_182620.3FAM33Afamily with sequence similarity 33, member A−1.59−2.17
NM_006342.1TACC3transforming, acidic coiled-coil containing protein 3−1.92−2.27NM_033120.2NKD2naked cuticle homolog 2−1.59−1.65
NM_001080450.1KIAA1553KIAA1553−1.92−1.65NM_003472.2DEKDEK oncogene (DNA binding)−1.58−1.91
NM_001018115.1FANCD2Fanconi anemia, complementation group D2−1.92−2.39NM_032015.3RNF26ring finger protein 26−1.58−1.70
NM_001033.2RRM1ribonucleotide reductase M1 polypeptide−1.92−1.87NM_018455.3CENPNcentromere protein N−1.57−2.01
NM_001078174.1SLC29A1solute carrier family 29 (nucleoside transporters)−1.91−2.19NM_003091.3SNRPBsmall nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptides B and B1−1.56−1.52
NM_153485.1NUP155nucleoporin 155kDa−1.91−1.65NM_003863.2DPM2dolichyl-phosphate mannosyltransferase polypeptide 2−1.56−1.77
NM_002482.2NASPnuclear autoantigenic sperm protein (histone-binding)−1.91−1.96NM_017916.1PIH1D1PIH1 domain containing 1−1.55−1.97
NM_176880.4NR2C2APnuclear receptor 2C2-associated protein−1.90−1.87NM_020810.1TRMT5tRNA methyltransferase 5 homolog−1.55−1.54
NM_021953.2FOXM1forkhead box M1−1.90−2.28NM_058219.2EXOSC6exosome component 6−1.55−1.65
NM_015721.2GEMIN4gem (nuclear organelle) associated protein 4−1.90−1.54NM_002882.2RANBP1RAN binding protein 1−1.54−1.88
NM_018188.2ATAD3AATPase family, AAA domain containing 3A−1.89−1.70NM_007111.3TFDP1transcription factor Dp-1−1.54−1.51
NM_145060.3C18orf24chromosome 18 open reading frame 24−1.89−2.45NM_021709.1SIVACD27-binding (Siva) protein−1.54−1.71
NM_018365.1MNS1meiosis-specific nuclear structural 1−1.89−2.12NM_015140.2TTLL12tubulin tyrosine ligase-like family, member 12−1.53−1.61
NM_012310.3KIF4Akinesin family member 4A−1.89−2.38NM_022044.2SDF2L1stromal cell-derived factor 2-like 1−1.53−1.70
NM_015261.2NCAPD3non-SMC condensin II complex, subunit D3−1.88−1.88NM_002346.1LY6Elymphocyte antigen 6 complex, locus E−1.52−1.56
NM_013296.3GPSM2G-protein signalling modulator 2−1.87−1.63NM_022490.1POLR1Epolymerase (RNA) I polypeptide E, 53kDa−1.52−1.77
NM_002691.1POLD1polymerase (DNA directed), delta 1, catalytic subunit−1.87−2.22NM_032799.4ZDHHC12zinc finger, DHHC-type containing 12−1.51−1.64
NM_203467.1PPIL5peptidylprolyl isomerase (cyclophilin)-like 5−1.87−1.79NM_001017980.2LOC203547hypothetical protein−1.51−1.54
NM_015201.3BOP1block of proliferation 1−1.87−2.29NM_003801.3GPAA1glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor attachment protein 1 homolog−1.51−1.89
NM_018353.3C14orf106chromosome 14 open reading frame 106−1.86−1.54NM_016594.1FKBP11FK506 binding protein 11, 19 kDa−1.50−1.94
NM_080626.5BRI3BPBRI3 binding protein−1.84−1.72NM_022754.4SFXN1sideroflexin 1−1.50−1.88

Venn diagram summarizing Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs) in GANT61-treated HT29 and GC3/c1 cells.

Cells were treated with GANT61 (20 µM) or vehicle alone (0.2% DMSO) for 24 hr, and total RNA extracted as described in Materials and Methods. Changes in gene expression were determined by cDNA microarray gene profiling using the Illumina Human-ref8 V3.0 Bead-Chip array. Genes with a False Discovery Rate (FDR)-adjusted p-value (p<0.001) and fold change >1.5 were considered DEGs. Upper panel: up-regulated genes. Lower panel: down-regulated genes. Differential expression for the total, unique up-regulated, unique down-regulated, common up-regulated, and common down-regulated DEGs, are shown.

Modulation of canonical signaling pathways following inhibition of HH signaling

Genes with significant changes in expression following GANT61 treatment were assigned to different canonical signaling pathways and subjected to Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA), where the resulting 1,368 DEGs in HT29 and 1,002 DEGs in GC3/c1 were mapped to networks defined by the IPA database (Figure 3). For the mapped DEGs including both up- and down- regulated genes, the 15 most significantly altered canonical pathways in HT29 demonstrated –log(p-value) ranging from 2.045 to 9.025, and in GC3/c1 from 2.32 to 7.509. Of the 15 pathways involving genes significantly down-regulated, 12 were common to both cell lines. The 3 common pathways with the greatest differential down-regulated expression include genes involved in the DNA damage response, cell cycle checkpoint control, and mitosis. Other pathways down-regulated involved the G1/S and G2/M DNA damage checkpoints, DNA precursor metabolism, and cell signaling involving different pathways including those involved in cancers, which also demonstrate 3 signatures unique to either HT29 or GC3/c1 (Figure 3). Of the 15 pathways involving genes that are the most significantly up-regulated, 8 are common to both HT29 and GC3/c1, and 7 represent unique pathways for each cell line, demonstrating more diversity in patterns of up-regulated gene expression (Figure 3). The up-regulated pathways common to both cell lines include the metabolism-related such as steroids, pyruvate, glycolysis glutathione, or glycerolipid, and not directly related to the control of cellular proliferation.
Figure 3

The top 15 canonical signaling pathways influenced by inhibition of GLI1/GLI2 function in HT29 and GC3/c1 cells.

The top 15 canonical signaling pathways, determined by IPA, that were significantly up-regulated or down-regulated by GANT61 treatment in HT29 and GC3/c1 cells, are shown. The 1,368 DEGs in HT29 and 1,002 DEGs in GC3/c1 were mapped to the IPA- defined network. The significance p-values that determine the probability that the association between the genes in the dataset and the canonical pathway is by chance alone were calculated by Fisher's exact test, and are expressed as –log (p-value). A. Pathways with enriched down-regulated genes. B. Pathways with enriched up-regulated genes. Blue: Pathways common to both HT29 and GC3/c1. Red: Pathways unique to either HT29 or GC3/c1. Yellow squares: Ratio of the number of DEGs that map to a specific canonical pathway divided by total number of genes that make up that pathway.

The top 15 canonical signaling pathways influenced by inhibition of GLI1/GLI2 function in HT29 and GC3/c1 cells.

The top 15 canonical signaling pathways, determined by IPA, that were significantly up-regulated or down-regulated by GANT61 treatment in HT29 and GC3/c1 cells, are shown. The 1,368 DEGs in HT29 and 1,002 DEGs in GC3/c1 were mapped to the IPA- defined network. The significance p-values that determine the probability that the association between the genes in the dataset and the canonical pathway is by chance alone were calculated by Fisher's exact test, and are expressed as –log (p-value). A. Pathways with enriched down-regulated genes. B. Pathways with enriched up-regulated genes. Blue: Pathways common to both HT29 and GC3/c1. Red: Pathways unique to either HT29 or GC3/c1. Yellow squares: Ratio of the number of DEGs that map to a specific canonical pathway divided by total number of genes that make up that pathway.

Genes that demonstrate differential fold change patterns in GANT61-treated HT29 and GC3/c1 cells

Fold change patterns of most highly DEGs in HT29 and GC3/c1 were selected, analyzed and displayed in a heat map to evaluate and compare similarity and differences in differential expression between the two cell lines treated with GANT61 (Figure 4). In addition to genes with diverse functions that are not directly related to HH-dependent proliferation, up-regulated genes that influence the G1/S transition and subsequent cell cycle progression, and that are common to both cell lines, include CDKN1A, and the DNA-damage-inducible transcripts 3 and 4 (DDIT3 and DDIT4). A considerably greater number of genes involved in cellular proliferation and cell cycle transition through the G1/S boundary, S-phase progression, and the G2/M transition, were significantly down-regulated in expression, and common to both cell lines. These include CDC6 (involved at G1/S), three genes that drive entry into and passage through S-phase (CCNE2, E2F2) and G2 (CCNA2), genes involved in DNA replication and repair (TYMS, POLE, TOP2A, TK1, POLE2), and two genes that regulate mitosis (AURKB, CDC20; Figure 4, asterisks).
Figure 4

Heat map showing fold change patterns of most highly DEGs in GANT61-treated human colon carcinoma cell lines.

The heat map was generated in Matlab (Mathworks), and compares fold change patterns of the most highly DEGs in HT29 and GC3/c1 cells after GANT61 treatment. The most highly DEGs demonstrated a differential expression p-value of p<0.001 between vehicle control (0.2% DMSO) and GANT61-treated cells. Left panel (red): up-regulated genes. Right panel (green): down-regulated genes. Genes denoted with asterisks define those genes with specific roles in G1/S transition, S-phase progression, DNA replication or repair, or regulation of the G2- or M- phase transitions. Fold changes of all down-regulated DEGs and all but one up-regulated DEG are ≤8 (central color spectrum bar).

Heat map showing fold change patterns of most highly DEGs in GANT61-treated human colon carcinoma cell lines.

The heat map was generated in Matlab (Mathworks), and compares fold change patterns of the most highly DEGs in HT29 and GC3/c1 cells after GANT61 treatment. The most highly DEGs demonstrated a differential expression p-value of p<0.001 between vehicle control (0.2% DMSO) and GANT61-treated cells. Left panel (red): up-regulated genes. Right panel (green): down-regulated genes. Genes denoted with asterisks define those genes with specific roles in G1/S transition, S-phase progression, DNA replication or repair, or regulation of the G2- or M- phase transitions. Fold changes of all down-regulated DEGs and all but one up-regulated DEG are ≤8 (central color spectrum bar). Of the 296 up-regulated genes, in addition to the genes comparably represented in the heat map that include DDIT3 (GADD153) and DDIT4 (REDD1), additional novel DNA damage-inducible transcripts were also identified and include DDIT2 (GADD45G), PPP1R15A (GADD34) and ATF3 (Table 1). TP53INP1, which can regulate cell cycle arrest, and TP53INP2, identified in cell death responses, were also up-regulated. Of the 309 genes significantly down-regulated in response to GANT61, novel genes identified include KIAA0101 (p15[PAF]), Replication Factor C variants 2, 3, 4, 5, CDT1, the E2F transcription factors CDCA4 and TFDP1, MDC1, PCNA, FANCD2, and the genes involved in DNA repair, RAD51C (XRCC3), RAD54B, RAD51 and HELLS (Table 2).

Differentially expressed genes involved in the G1/S and G2/M transitions

To further evaluate the genes involved in control of cell cycle progression in human colon carcinoma cells following GANT61 treatment, 10 genes involved in the G1/S or G2/M transitions, identified by IPA, were selected for further examination. Genes required at the G1/S boundary for G1/S transition, or for the induction of a G1/S checkpoint following cytostatic signals, include the two cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, p21Cip1 (CDKN1A) and p15Ink4B (CDKN2B), which were up-regulated by 5.2- and 3.1- fold, 24 hr after GANT61 administration (Table 3). Additional genes required for the G1/S transition that were down-regulated include the E2 transcription factor E2F2 (-4.2-fold), and other critical genes that were down-regulated by 2.1- to 3.2- fold, include CYCLIN E (CCNE2), CDK2 and CDC25A. At G2/M, GANT61 induced down-regulated expression of CCNA2 (CYCLIN A2), CYCLIN B1 (CCNB1), CYCLIN B2 (CCNB2), CDK1 (CDC2), and CDC25C by 2.3- to 3.1- fold (Table 3).
Table 3

Gene expression changes from cDNA arrays at G1/S and G2/M.

Cell Cycle PhaseAccession NumberGene SymbolGene NameFold Change
HT29GC3/c1
G1/SNM_000389.2CDKN1Acyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (p21Cip1)+5.21+2.02
NM_078487.2CDKN2Bcyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2B (p15Ink4b)+3.13+2.13
NM_004091.2E2F2E2F transcription factor 2−4.24−2.26
NM_057735.1CCNE2cyclin E2−3.22−3.24
NM_001789.2CDC25Acell division cycle 25 homolog A−2.50−2.45
NM_001798.2CDK2cyclin−dependent kinase 2−2.07−1.88
G2/MNM_001237.2CCNA2cyclin A2−3.11−3.01
NM_004701.2CCNB2cyclin B2−2.65−2.52
NM_001786.2CDK1cyclin-dependent kinase 1−2.47−2.63
NM_031966.2CCNB1cyclin B1−2.36−2.28
NM_022809.2CDC25Ccell division cycle 25 homolog C−2.27−2.05
To determine the robustness of cDNA microarray gene expression profiling following treatment of HT29 and GC3/c1 cells with GANT61 (20 µM) for 24 hr, qRT-PCR was employed to determine changes in expression of the selected group of 10 DEGs determined from the cDNA microarrays. The genes involved and primers synthesized are shown in Table 4. qRT-PCR was performed on cDNA generated using total RNA independently isolated from GANT61-treated HT29 and GC3/c1 cells for 0 hr, 16 hr, 24 hr, 38 hr and 48 hr after treatment. GAPDH was used to normalize all qRT-PCR data. Genes determined by qRT-PCR included the expression of E2F2, CCNE2, CDC25A and CDK2 at G1/S, which were down-regulated, up-regulation of CDKN1A and CDKN2B at G1/S, and down-regulation of CCNA2, CDC25C, CCNB2, and CDK1 at G2/M (Figure 5). The up-regulated or down-regulated changes in gene expression following GANT61 treatment and determined by cDNA microarray profiling, were confirmed by qRT-PCR (Figure 5).
Table 4

Sequences of primers used in quantitative Real-Time PCR.

Accession #Gene SymbolStrandPrimer SequenceProduct Size (bp)
NM_078487.2CDKN2BPlus 5′-TCTCCGTTGGCCGGAGGTCA-3′ 95
Minus 5′-TGGCAGGGTCTGCGCAGTTG-3′
NM_004701.2CCNB2Plus 5′-CTAACGGCGCCTCGTACGCT-3′ 54
Minus 5′-CAGGGAGGGACGCGGACTGA-3′
NM_057749.1CCNE2Plus 5′-GAGCGGTAGCTGGTCTGGCG-3′ 94
Minus 5′-GGGCTGGGGCTGCTGCTTAG-3′
NM_001789.2CDC25APlus 5′-CGTGGCTGCCTGCACTCTCA-3′ 159
Minus 5′-GGCTGTCACAGGTGACTGGGG-3′
NM_001798.3CDK2Plus 5′-TTTGCTGAGATGGTGACTCGCCG-3′ 159
Minus 5′-CCGGGCCCACTTGGGGAAAC-3′
NM_004091.2E2F2Plus 5′-CCGGCAGAAGCTGTGTGGGG-3′ 97
Minus 5′-GGCCTCCCTAGGCCCAGCTT-3′
NM_001237.3CCNA2Plus 5′-AAAAGGCAGCGCCCGTCCAA-3′ 89
Minus 5′-CTGCTGCTGCGCTAGACCCC-3′
NM_005631.3CDKN1APlus 5′-CTGCGCCAGCTGAGGTGTGA-3′ 189
Minus 5′-GCTGCTCGCTGTCCACTGGG-3′
NM_022809.2CDC25CPlus 5′-GTGCATTTAGCTGGGATGACAATGGAA-3′ 189
Minus 5′-GGCCACTTCTGCTCACCTTTGC-3′
NM_001786.2CDK1Plus 5′-ACTGGCTGATTTTGGCCTTGCC-3′ 118
Minus 5′-TGAGTAACGAGCTGACCCCAGCAA-3′
NM_005269GLI1Plus5′GCCCAGACAGAGGCCCACTC-3′547
Minus5′CTGCAGCCATCCCAACGGCA-3′
NM_005270GLI2Plus 5′-CACCGCTGCTCAAAGAGAA-3′ 227
Minus 5′-TCTCCACGCCACTGTCATT-3′
NM_000264PTCH1Plus 5′-CCACAGAAGCGCTCCTACA-3′ 214
Minus 5′-CTGTAATTTCGCCCCTTCC-3′
Figure 5

Selected DEGs from cDNA array gene expression profiling analyzed by qRT- PCR in HT29 (A) or GC3/c1 (B).

Cells were treated with vehicle alone (0.2% DMSO) or GANT61 (20 µM) for 16 hr, 24 hr, 38 hr, or 48 hr. Total RNA was extracted and qRT-PCR was performed as described in Materials and Methods using the primer sets listed in Table 2. Data represent the mean±SD of 4 determinations, and GAPDH was used to normalize the relative mRNA levels.

Selected DEGs from cDNA array gene expression profiling analyzed by qRT- PCR in HT29 (A) or GC3/c1 (B).

Cells were treated with vehicle alone (0.2% DMSO) or GANT61 (20 µM) for 16 hr, 24 hr, 38 hr, or 48 hr. Total RNA was extracted and qRT-PCR was performed as described in Materials and Methods using the primer sets listed in Table 2. Data represent the mean±SD of 4 determinations, and GAPDH was used to normalize the relative mRNA levels.

Discussion

The HH signaling pathway is activated in a variety of human cancers following mutations in genes that regulate canonical HH signaling, including the receptor PTC, and the HH signaling molecule, SMO, and can also be activated via transcriptional up-regulation of the HH ligands (reviewed in [3]). This pathway is becoming of increasing importance due to gaining insight into its prominent role in many developmental processes, and in the maintenance of the malignant phenotype in a wide variety of human cancers, whose growth has been found to be prevented by selective inhibition of constitutive HH pathway activity [14], [35], [36]. Tumors of the brain, prostate, skin, pancreas, and kidney have demonstrated the requirement for HH-GLI signaling, and have responded to inhibition of the HH signaling target molecule SMO by cyclopamine or SMOshRNA [4], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23]. The transcriptional activators in HH signaling comprise members of the GLI family of transcription factors, GLI1 and GLI2, which have both distinct as well as overlapping functions [16]. Activation of the GLI proteins is an intricate process that involves modifications and interactions of a number of positive and negative pathway regulators and is not fully understood [1], [14], [35]. Target genes regulated by the HH signaling pathway differ between tissues and cell types, as well as being influenced by the presence or absence of regulatory factors co-expressed with GLI proteins that eventually determine the transcriptional programs activated by HH signaling [6], [37]. Thus, oncogenic signaling pathways converge on canonical HH signaling at the level of the GLI transcription factors and additionally on target genes downstream of GLI1 and GLI2 to further drive the HH signaling pathway in cellular survival in malignancies [6], [7], [20], [38], [39], [40]. The HH signaling phenotype is therefore significantly influenced and ultimately determined by the co-expression of additional regulatory factors, and hence by the cellular context of gene expression. HH signaling plays a role in the differentiation program of normal intestinal villi [11], [12], [41], and it has been suggested recently that human colon cancer epithelial cells display a HH-GLI signaling axis in the process of carcinogenesis [24], [25]. Expression of HH-GLI pathway components was consistently demonstrated in an analysis of 40 primary human colon carcinomas and tumors metastatic to the liver [26], consistent with findings of previous investigators [25], [42], [43]. Thus, using qRT-PCR, the expression of GLI1, PTCH1, GLI2 and SHH was determined in all human colon carcinomas examined. The requirement for both GLI1 and GLI2 for sustained proliferation and survival of human colon carcinoma cell lines in vitro, including HT29, was demonstrated using siRNA technology [26]. In addition, knockdown of SMO by SMOshRNA prevented the growth of HT29 cells in SCID mice, while wt HT29 subcutaneous xenografts responded to cyclopamine by reduction in tumor volume [26]. Thus, canonical activation of GLI1 and GLI2 via SMO is important for the survival and proliferation of human colon carcinoma cells in vivo. In the current study, the function of both GLI1 and GLI2 downstream of SMO was inhibited in the presence of GANT61, a small molecule inhibitor that was identified from a cell-based screen to specifically inhibit GLI1-mediated transcription, but that also inhibited the function of GLI2 [34]. This agent was selected to specifically inhibit the final arbiters of HH signaling, the GLI transcription factors, in elucidation of the downstream target genes that determine HH-dependent proliferation in human colon carcinoma cells. Two cell lines, well characterized in our laboratories, HT29 and GC3/c1, were treated with GANT61 (20 µM) for 24 hr, and the expression of GLI1, GLI2 and PTCH1 mRNA was down-regulated. Further, the effects on cellular proliferation as determined by the distribution of cells within the cell cycle and flow cytometric analysis demonstrated accumulation of cells in G1 following treatment, with a concomitant decrease of cells from the G2/M compartment, and in the case of HT29, also from S-phase, suggesting the induction of a G1/S checkpoint. HT29 and GC3/c1 cells were subsequently treated with GANT61 (20 µM) for 24 hr, RNA was extracted, and changes in gene expression were determined by Illumina cDNA microarray profiling. Following statistical analyses, 1,368 genes in HT29 and 1,002 genes in GC3/c1, were determined to be significantly modulated by GANT61 treatment (FC>1.5; p<0.001). For genes that were up-regulated in expression, 296 genes were common to both cell lines, and for down-regulated genes, 309 genes were common to both cell lines. The blockade of cells at the G1/S boundary is evidenced by up-regulated expression of p21Cip1 and p15Ink4b that in part regulate the G1/S transition. p15Ink4b is a member of the Ink4 family of CDK inhibitors, is induced in response to cytostatic signals [32], [44], and complexes with CYCLIN D/CDK4 or CYCLIN D/CDK6 to mediate G1-phase arrest at the G1/S transition in certain systems [30], [32]. p21Cip1 can bind a broad range of cyclin-CDK complexes, with a preference for those containing CDK2 (reviewed in [31], [45], and during a normal cell cycle, facilitates active cyclin-CDK complex formation to promote cell proliferation. However when overexpressed, p21Cip1 forms an inhibitory complex with CYCLIN E/CDK2, leading to G1- and consequently S- phase arrest, thereby forming the G1/S checkpoint [46], [47]. The scheduled timing of expression of CYCLINS E, A and B that drive cell cycle progression, is reflected in the major changes in the phases of the cell cycle. CYCLIN E is expressed at maximal levels in cells undergoing the G1 to S transition, declining during S-phase progression, such that G2/M cells are CYCLIN E-negative (reviewed in [30]). CYCLIN A is expressed in late G1, demonstrates pronounced expression during S-phase, and increases as the cells advance towards G2, with degradation in early mitosis; B type cyclins begin to be expressed in late S-phase, and drive the cells though G2- and M- phases of the cell cycle [30]. CDK2 controls the G1/S transition by complexing with CYCLIN E, and is activated by CDC25A, which dephosphorylates CDK2 [48]. CDC2 controls cellular entry into mitosis at the G2/M transition, thereby forming complexes with CYCLINS A and B, is activated by CDC25C, and is down-regulated in late M-phase [29]. All of these genes are down-regulated in expression in response to the inhibition of GLI1/GLI2 function (Table 2). Thus, signals elicited to promote cellular accumulation at G1/S lead to the repression of genes that regulate further cell cycle progression, and p21Cip1 expression has been shown to deplete the expression of genes that regulate DNA replication and repair, and mitosis [49], [50], [51]. In the current study these genes include CDC6 (active at the G1/S transition and essential for the initiation of DNA replication), TYMS, TOP2A, TK1, POLE and POLE2 (S-phase), and AURKB and CDC20 (mitosis [52], [53]), determined by heat map analysis. A schematic representation of the genes involved in GANT61-induced inhibition of cell cycle progression at G1/S, S-phase progression, and regulation during G2- and M-phases, identified from cDNA microarrays, heat map analysis, and by qRT-PCR, is shown in Figure 6, and involves 5 of the 12 common signaling pathways determined by IPA analysis.
Figure 6

Schematic representation of genes involved in GANT61-induced inhibition of cell cycle progression.

From cDNA microarray, heat map, and qRT-PCR analyses, genes involved at different phases of the cell cycle including the G1/S transition, and progression through S- G2- and M- phases, are shown. The genes identified include CDK inhibitors, members of the CDK and CDC families, cyclins, genes involved in DNA replication and repair, and genes that regulate the mitotic spindle, and involve 5 of the 12 common signaling pathways determined by IPA analysis. Red: Up-regulated genes. Green: Down-regulated genes. Light shade→dark shade, increasing differential expression.

Schematic representation of genes involved in GANT61-induced inhibition of cell cycle progression.

From cDNA microarray, heat map, and qRT-PCR analyses, genes involved at different phases of the cell cycle including the G1/S transition, and progression through S- G2- and M- phases, are shown. The genes identified include CDK inhibitors, members of the CDK and CDC families, cyclins, genes involved in DNA replication and repair, and genes that regulate the mitotic spindle, and involve 5 of the 12 common signaling pathways determined by IPA analysis. Red: Up-regulated genes. Green: Down-regulated genes. Light shade→dark shade, increasing differential expression. Comprehensive cDNA microarray gene profiling analysis of genes that determine the HH signaling phenotype has been conducted only in non-cancer cell models. In these systems, GLI activation has been stimulated by EGF treatment [6], stable GLI1 or HA-RAS expression [7], or expression of constitutively activated GLI2 [16]. In these studies, CYCLIN D [6], [7], GADD153 [7], CDKN2B, CDKN1A, CDK2, PCNA, TOP2A, CCNB1, XRCC1 [16], have been identified as genes activated downstream of GLI. In GANT61-treated human colon carcinoma cells, novel DNA damage-inducible transcripts DDIT3 (GADD153), DDIT4 (REDD1), DDIT2 (GADD45G), PPP1R15A (GADD34) and ATF3 were significantly up-regulated concomitant with the arrest of cells at G1/S. TP53INP1, involved in cell cycle regulation, and TP53INP2, linked to cell death responses, were also up-regulated. Additional novel genes involved in S-phase progression and DNA damage response that were significantly down-regulated include KIAA0101 (p15[PAF]), Replication Factor C variants 2, 3, 4, 5, CDT1, the E2F transcription factors CDCA4 and TFDP1, MDC1, PCNA, FANCD2, and the genes involved in DNA repair, RAD51C (XRCC3), RAD54B, RAD51 and HELLS. In summary, we have compared gene expression profiles in two human colon carcinoma cell lines after targeting the function of the transcriptional regulators of HH signaling, GLI1 and GLI2, using the small molecule inhibitor GANT61. Data are consistent with accumulation of cells at the G1/S boundary, as evidenced from flow cytometric analysis, cDNA microarray gene profiling, and qRT- PCR. GANT61-treated cells demonstrated up-regulated expression of the CDK inhibitors p21Cip1 and p15Ink4b that function at the G1/S boundary, and down-regulated expression of additional key genes that determine the G1/S transition, initiation of DNA replication, S-phase progression, DNA repair, and subsequent transition through the G2/M phases. Inhibition of the transcriptional regulation of HH signaling in human colon carcinoma cells therefore directly involves genes that regulate cell cycle transition through G1/S, cell cycle progression, and proliferation, and genes involved in stress-induced and DNA damage responses.

Materials and Methods

Human colon carcinoma cell lines

HT29 was purchased from ATCC (Manassas, VA), while GC3/c1 was established in culture by our group from a human colon adenocarcinoma xenograft model [54]; both cell lines express mutant p53 alleles. Cell lines were maintained in the presence of folate-free RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% dFBS and 80 nM [6RS] 5-methyltetrahydrofolate.

Flow cytometric analysis

HT29 and GC3/c1 cells were plated at a density of 100,000 cells/well in six-well plates. After overnight attachment, cells were treated with GANT61 (20µM; Enzo Life Sciences, Germany) or vehicle control (DMSO, 0.2%), in duplicate, for 24 hr, followed by washing ×1 with PBS, trypsinization, and centrifugation. Cells were fixed with 70% ethanol at RT, 20–30 min, stored at −20°C overnight, centrifuged for 5 min at 200×g to remove ethanol, and washed ×1 in PBS. The cells were resuspended in PBS, and low molecular weight DNA was extracted using DNA extraction buffer (0.2M Na2HPO4 and 0.1M citric acid, pH 7.8) for 5 min. The extracted DNA was centrifuged and resuspended in DNA staining solution containing propidium iodide (50 µg) and DNAse-free RNAse (2 mg), and allowed to incubate for 30 min in the dark at RT. Distribution of cells throughout the cell cycle was analyzed using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer, and data were analyzed using CellQuest software.

RNA isolation

Cells were seeded at 7×106 cells/10 cm plate overnight at ≈60% confluency, and subsequently treated with either vehicle control (0.2% DMSO) or GANT61 (20 µM), in duplicate, for 24 hr. Cells were subsequently harvested and RNA was isolated using the RNeasy® Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) following the manufacturer's protocol. Integrity of the RNA was determined by spectrophotometry and electrophoresis.

cDNA microarray analysis

RNA (250 ng) was reverse transcribed into cRNA and biotin-UTP labeled using the Illumina® TotalPrep RNA Amplification Kit (Ambion, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. cRNA was quantified using a nanodrop spectrophotometer, and the cRNA quality (size distribution) further analyzed on a 1% agarose gel. Biotinylated cRNAs were hybridized to the Illumina Human-ref8 V3.0 BeadChip (Illumina, San Diego, CA) that represents 18,401 genes, using standard protocols. The arrays were washed and subsequently scanned using an Illumina BeadArray Reader. Raw signal intensities of gene expression data were processed and analyzed using GenomeStudio (Illumina), with background subtraction and average normalization performed on the average signal intensities, and p-values were calculated. Raw data were exported from GenomeStudio into Excel (available as Data S1 and Data S2), and the fold change in gene expression calculated, by dividing the average gene expression signal intensity of treated samples (GANT61) with that of the vehicle control (DSMO). Differential gene expression (DEG) analysis between control and GANT61-treated samples, was subsequently conducted using the Illumina customer model, which applies multiple testing corrections that determines the false discovery rate (FDR; [55]. Thus, FDR-adjusted differential scores and p-values for each gene/probe set between treated and control samples were generated. Genes with a FDR-adjusted p-value of p<0.001 and fold change ≥1.5 were considered to be DEGs and were subjected to Venn analysis and Ingenuity Pathway analysis. These differentially expressed genes were, uploaded and mapped to the library of canonical pathways of the Ingenuity Pathways Analysis (IPA) database for pathway analysis (Ingenuity® Systems, http://www.ingenuity.com, Mountain View, CA). The mapped datasets containing either up-regulated or down-regulated genes in HT29 or GC3/c1 cells with corresponding expression values were subjected to core analysis that includes overall canonical pathway enrichment analysis. The significance of enrichment of genes mapped to different canonical pathways was calculated by the Fischer's exact test (p-value) to determine the probability that the association between the genes and the canonical pathway could be explained by chance alone. Further, the ratio between the number of identified genes in a particular pathway and total number of genes that make up that pathway provides an estimation of the extent of pathway involvement. The enriched canonical pathways were ranked by −log (p-value) as shown in a histogram of pathway vs. –log (p-value). Datasets containing both up-regulated and down-regulated genes were also analyzed in selected pathways pertaining to cell cycle progression at G1/S and G2/M. Fold change patterns of most highly DEGs in HT29 and GC3/c1 were compared by Heat map analysis using Matlab (Mathworks) software. DEGs analyzed and displayed in the heat map demonstrated a differential expression p-value of p<0.001 between control and GANT61 treated cells in both cell lines.

Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR)

The expression levels of selected genes identified by cDNA microarray expression profiling at 24 hr following GANT61 treatment, were validated by qRT-PCR. Thus, HT29 or GC3/c1 cells were either untreated (vehicle control, 0.2% DMSO), or treated with GANT61 (20 µM) for 0 hr, 16 hr, 24 hr, 38 hr or 48 hr at 37°C, dissolved in DMSO-containing medium. Total RNA (1 µg) was employed to prepare cDNA via reverse transcription using the iScript Select cDNA Synthesis Kit (Biorad) Reverse Transcription System according to manufacturers instructions and analyzed using an Applied Biosystems 7500 PCR Detection System (Applied Biosystems Inc.). All amplifications were primed by pairs of chemically synthesized 18- to 24- mer oligonucleotides designed using freely available primer design software (Primer-BLAST, NCBI) to generate target amplicons of 50–547 bp. All reactions were performed in a final volume of 15 µl. qRT-PCR reaction conditions were as follows: activation at 95°C for 10 min with 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 15 s, primer annealing and extension at 60°C for 1 min and ramping back to 95°C. Melt curve analysis of all samples was routinely performed to ascertain that only the expected products had been generated. A fluorescence reading determined the extent of amplification at the end of each cycle. mRNA expression levels of target genes were normalized to the expression of glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and quantified using the comparative CT method [56]. Q-RT-PCR for each gene was determined in duplicate, and each experiment was repeated at least twice. HT29 Raw Microarray Data. (11.39 MB XLS) Click here for additional data file. GC3/c1 Raw Microarray Data. (11.06 MB XLS) Click here for additional data file.
  55 in total

1.  Blockade of hedgehog signaling inhibits pancreatic cancer invasion and metastases: a new paradigm for combination therapy in solid cancers.

Authors:  Georg Feldmann; Surajit Dhara; Volker Fendrich; Djahida Bedja; Robert Beaty; Michael Mullendore; Collins Karikari; Hector Alvarez; Christine Iacobuzio-Donahue; Antonio Jimeno; Kathleen L Gabrielson; William Matsui; Anirban Maitra
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 2.  Modeling INK4/ARF tumor suppression in the mouse.

Authors:  Justin H Berger; Nabeel Bardeesy
Journal:  Curr Mol Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.222

3.  Integrative genomic analyses on GLI2: mechanism of Hedgehog priming through basal GLI2 expression, and interaction map of stem cell signaling network with P53.

Authors:  Yuriko Katoh; Masaru Katoh
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.650

4.  Inhibition of GLI-mediated transcription and tumor cell growth by small-molecule antagonists.

Authors:  Matthias Lauth; Asa Bergström; Takashi Shimokawa; Rune Toftgård
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Role of GLI2 transcription factor in growth and tumorigenicity of prostate cells.

Authors:  Saravanan Thiyagarajan; Neehar Bhatia; Shannon Reagan-Shaw; Diana Cozma; Andrei Thomas-Tikhonenko; Nihal Ahmad; Vladimir S Spiegelman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Sonic hedgehog-Gli1 pathway in colorectal adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Yue-Hong Bian; Shu-Hong Huang; Ling Yang; Xiao-Li Ma; Jing-Wu Xie; Hong-Wei Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  ZD1839 induces p15INK4b and causes G1 arrest by inhibiting the mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway.

Authors:  Makoto Koyama; Youichirou Matsuzaki; Shingo Yogosawa; Toshiaki Hitomi; Mayumi Kawanaka; Toshiyuki Sakai
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 6.261

8.  Epidermal growth factor receptor signaling synergizes with Hedgehog/GLI in oncogenic transformation via activation of the MEK/ERK/JUN pathway.

Authors:  Harald Schnidar; Markus Eberl; Stefan Klingler; Doris Mangelberger; Maria Kasper; Cornelia Hauser-Kronberger; Gerhard Regl; Renate Kroismayr; Richard Moriggl; Maria Sibilia; Fritz Aberger
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 9.  The Gli code: an information nexus regulating cell fate, stemness and cancer.

Authors:  Ariel Ruiz i Altaba; Christophe Mas; Barbara Stecca
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 20.808

10.  APC/C- and Mad2-mediated degradation of Cdc20 during spindle checkpoint activation.

Authors:  Sheng Ge; Jeffrey R Skaar; Michele Pagano
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2009-01-11       Impact factor: 4.534

View more
  37 in total

Review 1.  Synthetic Small Molecule Inhibitors of Hh Signaling As Anti-Cancer Chemotherapeutics.

Authors:  C A Maschinot; J R Pace; M K Hadden
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Inhibition of Hedgehog signaling in the gastrointestinal tract: targeting the cancer microenvironment.

Authors:  Juanita L Merchant; Milena Saqui-Salces
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 12.111

3.  Inhibition of Ciliogenesis Promotes Hedgehog Signaling, Tumorigenesis, and Metastasis in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Nadia B Hassounah; Martha Nunez; Colleen Fordyce; Denise Roe; Ray Nagle; Thomas Bunch; Kimberly M McDermott
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 5.852

4.  eIF4E3 acts as a tumor suppressor by utilizing an atypical mode of methyl-7-guanosine cap recognition.

Authors:  Michael J Osborne; Laurent Volpon; Jack A Kornblatt; Biljana Culjkovic-Kraljacic; Aurélie Baguet; Katherine L B Borden
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Blocking Hedgehog survival signaling at the level of the GLI genes induces DNA damage and extensive cell death in human colon carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Tapati Mazumdar; Jennifer Devecchio; Akwasi Agyeman; Ting Shi; Janet A Houghton
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Hedgehog signaling drives cellular survival in human colon carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Tapati Mazumdar; Jennifer DeVecchio; Ting Shi; Janay Jones; Akwasi Agyeman; Janet A Houghton
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Off-target function of the Sonic hedgehog inhibitor cyclopamine in mediating apoptosis via nitric oxide-dependent neutral sphingomyelinase 2/ceramide induction.

Authors:  Marisa Meyers-Needham; Jocelyn A Lewis; Salih Gencer; R David Sentelle; Sahar A Saddoughi; Christopher J Clarke; Yusuf A Hannun; Haakan Norell; Telma Martins da Palma; Michael Nishimura; Jacqueline M Kraveka; Zohreh Khavandgar; Monzur Murshed; M Ozgur Cevik; Besim Ogretmen
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 6.261

8.  Prognostic value of hedgehog signaling pathway in patients with colon cancer.

Authors:  Meihua Xu; Xinhua Li; Ting Liu; Aimin Leng; Guiying Zhang
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 9.  In the war against solid tumors arsenic trioxide needs partners.

Authors:  Pochi R Subbarayan; Bach Ardalan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2014-09

10.  Pharmacological targeting of GLI1 inhibits proliferation, tumor emboli formation and in vivo tumor growth of inflammatory breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Helen O Oladapo; Michael Tarpley; Scott J Sauer; Kezia A Addo; Shalonda M Ingram; Dillon Strepay; Ben K Ehe; Lhoucine Chdid; Michael Trinkler; Jose R Roques; David B Darr; Jodie M Fleming; Gayathri R Devi; Kevin P Williams
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 8.679

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.