Literature DB >> 20953296

Heterospecific Acoustic Interference: Effects on Calling in Oophaga pumilio.

Stefanie Wong1, Humberto Parada, Peter M Narins.   

Abstract

Call rate suppression is a common short-term solution for avoiding acoustic interference in animals. It has been widely documented between and within frog species, but the effects of non-anuran calling on frog vocalizations is less well known. Heterospecific acoustic interference on the calling of Oophaga pumilio (Bauer, 1994) (formerly Dendrobates pumilio) males was studied in a lowland, wet tropical forest in SE Nicaragua. Acoustic playback experiments were conducted to characterize the responses of O. pumilio males to interfering calls of cicadas, two species of crickets and a sympatric dendrobatid frog, Phyllobates lugubris. Call rate, call bout duration, percent of time calling, dominant frequency and latency to first-call were analyzed. Significant call rate suppression was observed during all stimulus playbacks, yet no significant differences were found in spontaneous call rates during pre- and post-playback trials. Dominant frequency significantly decreased after P. lugubris playback and first-call latency significantly decreased in response to both cicada and tree cricket playbacks. These results provide robust evidence that O. pumilio males can dynamically modify their calling pattern in unique ways, depending on the source of the heterospecific acoustic interference.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20953296      PMCID: PMC2953814          DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2008.00452.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotropica        ISSN: 0006-3606            Impact factor:   2.508


  6 in total

1.  Acoustic interference limits call detection in a Neotropical frog Hyla ebraccata.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Using image processing to detect and classify narrow-band cricket and frog calls.

Authors:  T Scott Brandes; Piotr Naskrecki; Harold K Figueroa
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  THE SENSORY BASIS OF SEXUAL SELECTION FOR COMPLEX CALLS IN THE TÚNGARA FROG, PHYSALAEMUS PUSTULOSUS (SEXUAL SELECTION FOR SENSORY EXPLOITATION).

Authors:  Michael J Ryan; A Stanley Rand
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Synchronized calling in a treefrog (Smilisca sila). Short behavioral latencies and implications for neural pathways involved in call perception and production.

Authors:  M J Ryan
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.808

Review 5.  Resonators in insect sound production: how insects produce loud pure-tone songs.

Authors:  H C Bennet-Clark
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Sexual signalling in bladder grasshoppers: tactical design for maximizing calling range.

Authors:  M Van Staaden; H Römer
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.312

  6 in total
  6 in total

1.  Acoustic interference and recognition space within a complex assemblage of dendrobatid frogs.

Authors:  Adolfo Amézquita; Sandra Victoria Flechas; Albertina Pimentel Lima; Herbert Gasser; Walter Hödl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Extended amplification of acoustic signals by amphibian burrows.

Authors:  Matías I Muñoz; Mario Penna
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  High background noise shapes selective auditory filters in a tropical cricket.

Authors:  Arne K D Schmidt; Klaus Riede; Heiner Römer
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Maintaining acoustic communication at a cocktail party: heterospecific masking noise improves signal detection through frequency separation.

Authors:  M E Siegert; H Römer; M Hartbauer
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Assessing acoustic competition between sibling frog species using rhythm analysis.

Authors:  Alannah Filer; Lara S Burchardt; Berndt J van Rensburg
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Ultraviolet radiation influences perch selection by a neotropical poison-dart frog.

Authors:  Lee B Kats; Gary M Bucciarelli; David E Schlais; Andrew R Blaustein; Barbara A Han
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.