Literature DB >> 10562517

Resonators in insect sound production: how insects produce loud pure-tone songs.

H C Bennet-Clark1.   

Abstract

In a resonant vibration, two reactive elements, such as a mass and a spring, interact: the resonant frequency depends on the magnitude of these two elements. The build-up and decay of the vibration depend on the way the resonator is driven and on the damping in the system. The evidence for the existence of resonators in insect sound production is assessed. The mechanics of different types of sound-producing system found in insects is described. Mechanical frequency-multiplier mechanisms, which convert the relatively slow contraction of muscles to the higher frequency of the sound, are commonly used to convert the comparatively slow muscle contraction rate to the higher frequency of the sound. The phasing and rate of mechanical excitation may also affect the frequency and duration of the sound that is produced. Although in many insects the song may appear to be produced by the excitation of a simple resonator, the song frequency may not be constant, suggesting that other factors, such as the mechanism of excitation, or variation of the effective mass or elasticity of the system during sound production, may be additional determinants of the song frequency. Loud, and hence efficient, transduction of the energy of a mechanical resonator into sound may involve a second stage of transduction which, by damping the resonator, may compromise tonal purity. Some insect singers resolve this problem by tuning both stages of transduction to the same frequency, thereby maintaining tonal purity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10562517     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.202.23.3347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  25 in total

1.  Changing resonator geometry to boost sound power decouples size and song frequency in a small insect.

Authors:  Natasha Mhatre; Fernando Montealegre-Z; Rohini Balakrishnan; Daniel Robert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Anatomic and acoustic sexual dimorphism in the sound emission system of Phoenicoprocta capistrata (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae).

Authors:  Laura Rodríguez-Loeches; Alejandro Barro; Martha Pérez; Frank Coro
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2009-01-03

3.  Frequency tuning and directional sensitivity of tympanal vibrations in the field cricket Gryllus bimaculatus.

Authors:  Martin J Lankheet; Uroš Cerkvenik; Ole N Larsen; Johan L van Leeuwen
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Whispering to the deaf: communication by a frog without external vocal sac or tympanum in noisy environments.

Authors:  Renaud Boistel; Thierry Aubin; Peter Cloetens; Max Langer; Brigitte Gillet; Patrice Josset; Nicolas Pollet; Anthony Herrel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Heterospecific Acoustic Interference: Effects on Calling in Oophaga pumilio.

Authors:  Stefanie Wong; Humberto Parada; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Biotropica       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 2.508

6.  Limited plasticity in the phenotypic variance-covariance matrix for male advertisement calls in the black field cricket, Teleogryllus commodus.

Authors:  W R Pitchers; R Brooks; M D Jennions; T Tregenza; I Dworkin; J Hunt
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  Growling from the gut: co-option of the gastric mill for acoustic communication in ghost crabs.

Authors:  Jennifer R A Taylor; Maya S deVries; Damian O Elias
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Are terrestrial isopods able to use stridulation and vibrational communication as forms of intra and interspecific signaling and defense strategies as insects do? A preliminary study in Armadillo officinalis.

Authors:  Sofia Cividini; Spyros Sfenthourakis; Giuseppe Montesanto
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2019-12-10

9.  The potential influence of morphology on the evolutionary divergence of an acoustic signal.

Authors:  W R Pitchers; C P Klingenberg; T Tregenza; J Hunt; I Dworkin
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 2.411

10.  Wing stridulation in a Jurassic katydid (Insecta, Orthoptera) produced low-pitched musical calls to attract females.

Authors:  Jun-Jie Gu; Fernando Montealegre-Z; Daniel Robert; Michael S Engel; Ge-Xia Qiao; Dong Ren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.