Literature DB >> 27209276

Extended amplification of acoustic signals by amphibian burrows.

Matías I Muñoz1, Mario Penna2.   

Abstract

Animals relying on acoustic signals for communication must cope with the constraints imposed by the environment for sound propagation. A resource to improve signal broadcast is the use of structures that favor the emission or the reception of sounds. We conducted playback experiments to assess the effect of the burrows occupied by the frogs Eupsophus emiliopugini and E. calcaratus on the amplitude of outgoing vocalizations. In addition, we evaluated the influence of these cavities on the reception of externally generated sounds potentially interfering with conspecific communication, namely, the vocalizations emitted by four syntopic species of anurans (E. emiliopugini, E. calcaratus, Batrachyla antartandica, and Pleurodema thaul) and the nocturnal owls Strix rufipes and Glaucidium nanum. Eupsophus advertisement calls emitted from within the burrows experienced average amplitude gains of 3-6 dB at 100 cm from the burrow openings. Likewise, the incoming vocalizations of amphibians and birds were amplified on average above 6 dB inside the cavities. The amplification of internally broadcast Eupsophus vocalizations favors signal detection by nearby conspecifics. Reciprocally, the amplification of incoming conspecific and heterospecific signals facilitates the detection of neighboring males and the monitoring of the levels of potentially interfering biotic noise by resident frogs, respectively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anura; Burrows; Sound amplification; Sound emission; Sound reception

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27209276     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-016-1093-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  16 in total

1.  Animal communication: tree-hole frogs exploit resonance effects.

Authors:  Björn Lardner; Maklarin bin Lakim
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-12-05       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Acoustic interference and recognition space within a complex assemblage of dendrobatid frogs.

Authors:  Adolfo Amézquita; Sandra Victoria Flechas; Albertina Pimentel Lima; Herbert Gasser; Walter Hödl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Living in a "stethoscope": burrow-acoustics promote auditory specializations in subterranean rodents.

Authors:  Simone Lange; Hynek Burda; Regina E Wegner; Philip Dammann; Sabine Begall; Mathias Kawalika
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2006-11-21

Review 4.  Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Benjamin M Bolker; Mollie E Brooks; Connie J Clark; Shane W Geange; John R Poulsen; M Henry H Stevens; Jada-Simone S White
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 5.  Simultaneous inference in general parametric models.

Authors:  Torsten Hothorn; Frank Bretz; Peter Westfall
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.207

6.  Sound production in Onuxodon fowleri (Carapidae) and its amplification by the host shell.

Authors:  Loïc Kéver; Orphal Colleye; Marco Lugli; David Lecchini; Franck Lerouvreur; Anthony Herrel; Eric Parmentier
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Severe constraints for sound communication in a frog from the South American temperate forest.

Authors:  Mario Penna; Alicia Plaza; Felipe N Moreno-Gómez
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-06-09       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Heterospecific Acoustic Interference: Effects on Calling in Oophaga pumilio.

Authors:  Stefanie Wong; Humberto Parada; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Biotropica       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 2.508

9.  Cicadas impact bird communication in a noisy tropical rainforest.

Authors:  Patrick J Hart; Robert Hall; William Ray; Angela Beck; James Zook
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.671

10.  Contrasting Propagation of Natural Calls of Two Anuran Species from the South American Temperate Forest.

Authors:  Mario Penna; Felipe N Moreno-Gómez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Environmental conditions limit attractiveness of a complex sexual signal in the túngara frog.

Authors:  Wouter Halfwerk; Judith A H Smit; Hugo Loning; Amanda M Lea; Inga Geipel; Jacintha Ellers; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 14.919

2.  The acoustic adaptation hypothesis in a widely distributed South American frog: Southernmost signals propagate better.

Authors:  Nelson A Velásquez; Felipe N Moreno-Gómez; Enzo Brunetti; Mario Penna
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.