Literature DB >> 21969562

Acoustic interference and recognition space within a complex assemblage of dendrobatid frogs.

Adolfo Amézquita1, Sandra Victoria Flechas, Albertina Pimentel Lima, Herbert Gasser, Walter Hödl.   

Abstract

In species-rich assemblages of acoustically communicating animals, heterospecific sounds may constrain not only the evolution of signal traits but also the much less-studied signal-processing mechanisms that define the recognition space of a signal. To test the hypothesis that the recognition space is optimally designed, i.e., that it is narrower toward the species that represent the higher potential for acoustic interference, we studied an acoustic assemblage of 10 diurnally active frog species. We characterized their calls, estimated pairwise correlations in calling activity, and, to model the recognition spaces of five species, conducted playback experiments with 577 synthetic signals on 531 males. Acoustic co-occurrence was not related to multivariate distance in call parameters, suggesting a minor role for spectral or temporal segregation among species uttering similar calls. In most cases, the recognition space overlapped but was greater than the signal space, indicating that signal-processing traits do not act as strictly matched filters against sounds other than homospecific calls. Indeed, the range of the recognition space was strongly predicted by the acoustic distance to neighboring species in the signal space. Thus, our data provide compelling evidence of a role of heterospecific calls in evolutionarily shaping the frogs' recognition space within a complex acoustic assemblage without obvious concomitant effects on the signal.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21969562      PMCID: PMC3193210          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1104773108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  15 in total

1.  How evolutionary history shapes recognition mechanisms.

Authors:  M J. Ryan; S M. Phelps; A S. Rand
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Song variation in an avian ring species.

Authors:  D E Irwin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  The role of call frequency and the auditory papillae in phonotactic behavior in male Dart-poison frogs Epipedobates femoralis (Dendrobatidae).

Authors:  W Hödl; A Amézquita; P M Narins
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 4.  Biases in signal evolution: learning makes a difference.

Authors:  Carel ten Cate; Candy Rowe
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Animal visual systems and the evolution of color patterns: sensory processing illuminates signal evolution.

Authors:  John A Endler; David A Westcott; Joah R Madden; Tim Robson
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Signaller: receiver coordination and the timing of communication in Amazonian birds.

Authors:  David A Luther
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Carotenoid limitation and mate preference evolution: a test of the indicator hypothesis in guppies (Poecilia reticulata).

Authors:  G F Grether
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Selection of exaggerated male traits by female aesthetic senses.

Authors:  M Enquist; A Arak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-02-04       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Heterospecific Acoustic Interference: Effects on Calling in Oophaga pumilio.

Authors:  Stefanie Wong; Humberto Parada; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Biotropica       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 2.508

10.  Generalization in response to mate recognition signals.

Authors:  Michael J Ryan; William Rand; Peter L Hurd; Steve M Phelps; A Stanley Rand
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.926

View more
  23 in total

1.  Species interactions and the structure of complex communication networks.

Authors:  Joseph A Tobias; Robert Planqué; Dominic L Cram; Nathalie Seddon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Feature extraction and integration underlying perceptual decision making during courtship behavior.

Authors:  Jan Clemens; Bernhard Ronacher
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  A broad filter between call frequency and peripheral auditory sensitivity in northern grasshopper mice (Onychomys leucogaster).

Authors:  Dana M Green; Tucker Scolman; O'neil W Guthrie; Bret Pasch
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 4.  "To ear is human, to frogive is divine": Bob Capranica's legacy to auditory neuroethology.

Authors:  Andrea Megela Simmons
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Ample active acoustic space of a frog from the South American temperate forest.

Authors:  Mario Penna; Felipe N Moreno-Gómez
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  To accept or reject heterospecific mates: behavioural decisions underlying premating isolation.

Authors:  Daizaburo Shizuka; Emily J Hudson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Behavioural tuning in a tropical amphibian along an altitudinal gradient.

Authors:  Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Patricia M Quiñones; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Shared Song Detector Neurons in Drosophila Male and Female Brains Drive Sex-Specific Behaviors.

Authors:  David Deutsch; Jan Clemens; Stephan Y Thiberge; Georgia Guan; Mala Murthy
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Extended amplification of acoustic signals by amphibian burrows.

Authors:  Matías I Muñoz; Mario Penna
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  The role of temporal call structure in species recognition of male Allobates talamancae (Cope, 1875): (Anura: Dendrobatidae).

Authors:  Dennis Kollarits; Christian Wappl; Max Ringler
Journal:  Herpetozoa       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 0.841

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.