Literature DB >> 20952816

Dosimetry for ion beam radiotherapy.

Christian P Karger1, Oliver Jäkel, Hugo Palmans, Tatsuaki Kanai.   

Abstract

Recently, ion beam radiotherapy (including protons as well as heavier ions) gained considerable interest. Although ion beam radiotherapy requires dose prescription in terms of iso-effective dose (referring to an iso-effective photon dose), absorbed dose is still required as an operative quantity to control beam delivery, to characterize the beam dosimetrically and to verify dose delivery. This paper reviews current methods and standards to determine absorbed dose to water in ion beam radiotherapy, including (i) the detectors used to measure absorbed dose, (ii) dosimetry under reference conditions and (iii) dosimetry under non-reference conditions. Due to the LET dependence of the response of films and solid-state detectors, dosimetric measurements are mostly based on ion chambers. While a primary standard for ion beam radiotherapy still remains to be established, ion chamber dosimetry under reference conditions is based on similar protocols as for photons and electrons although the involved uncertainty is larger than for photon beams. For non-reference conditions, dose measurements in tissue-equivalent materials may also be necessary. Regarding the atomic numbers of the composites of tissue-equivalent phantoms, special requirements have to be fulfilled for ion beams. Methods for calibrating the beam monitor depend on whether passive or active beam delivery techniques are used. QA measurements are comparable to conventional radiotherapy; however, dose verification is usually single field rather than treatment plan based. Dose verification for active beam delivery techniques requires the use of multi-channel dosimetry systems to check the compliance of measured and calculated dose for a representative sample of measurement points. Although methods for ion beam dosimetry have been established, there is still room for developments. This includes improvement of the dosimetric accuracy as well as development of more efficient measurement techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20952816     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/21/R01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  17 in total

Review 1.  A review of recent advances in optical fibre sensors for in vivo dosimetry during radiotherapy.

Authors:  S O'Keeffe; D McCarthy; P Woulfe; M W D Grattan; A R Hounsell; D Sporea; L Mihai; I Vata; G Leen; E Lewis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  3D reconstruction of scintillation light emission from proton pencil beams using limited viewing angles-a simulation study.

Authors:  CheukKai Hui; Daniel Robertson; Sam Beddar
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Exradin W1 plastic scintillation detector for in vivo skin dosimetry in passive scattering proton therapy.

Authors:  Fahed Alsanea; Landon Wootton; Narayan Sahoo; Rajat Kudchadker; Usama Mahmood; Sam Beddar
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.685

4.  Comprehensive analysis of proton range uncertainties related to stopping-power-ratio estimation using dual-energy CT imaging.

Authors:  B Li; H C Lee; X Duan; C Shen; L Zhou; X Jia; M Yang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Characterization of a MLIC Detector for QA in Scanned Proton and Carbon Ion Beams.

Authors:  Alessandro Vai; Alfredo Mirandola; Giuseppe Magro; Davide Maestri; Edoardo Mastella; Andrea Mairani; Silvia Molinelli; Stefania Russo; Michele Togno; Sara La Civita; Mario Ciocca
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2019-11-26

6.  A 3D model to calculate water-to-air stopping power ratio in therapeutic carbon ion fields.

Authors:  D Sánchez-Parcerisa; A Gemmel; K Parodi; E Rietzel
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.724

7.  Radiological properties of nanocomposite Fricke gel dosimeters for heavy ion beams.

Authors:  Takuya Maeyama; Nobuhisa Fukunishi; Kenichi L Ishikawa; Kazuaki Fukasaku; Shigekazu Fukuda
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.724

8.  Issues involved in the quantitative 3D imaging of proton doses using optical CT and chemical dosimeters.

Authors:  Simon Doran; Tina Gorjiara; Andrzej Kacperek; John Adamovics; Zdenka Kuncic; Clive Baldock
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-01-02       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Evaluation of the dosimetric properties of a diode detector for small field proton radiosurgery.

Authors:  Grant A McAuley; Anthony V Teran; Jerry D Slater; James M Slater; Andrew J Wroe
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Next generation multi-scale biophysical characterization of high precision cancer particle radiotherapy using clinical proton, helium-, carbon- and oxygen ion beams.

Authors:  Ivana Dokic; Andrea Mairani; Martin Niklas; Ferdinand Zimmermann; Naved Chaudhri; Damir Krunic; Thomas Tessonnier; Alfredo Ferrari; Katia Parodi; Oliver Jäkel; Jürgen Debus; Thomas Haberer; Amir Abdollahi
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-08-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.