Literature DB >> 31998821

Characterization of a MLIC Detector for QA in Scanned Proton and Carbon Ion Beams.

Alessandro Vai1, Alfredo Mirandola1, Giuseppe Magro1, Davide Maestri1, Edoardo Mastella1, Andrea Mairani1,2, Silvia Molinelli1, Stefania Russo1, Michele Togno3, Sara La Civita3, Mario Ciocca1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Beam energy validation is a fundamental aspect of the routine quality assurance (QA) protocol of a particle therapy facility. A multilayer ionization chamber (MLIC) detector provides the optimal tradeoff between achieving accuracy in particle range determination and saving operational time in measurements and analysis procedures. We propose the characterization of a commercial MLIC as a suitable QA tool for a clinical environment with proton and carbon-ion scanning beams.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Commercial MLIC Giraffe (IBA Dosimetry, Schwarzenbruck, Germany) was primarily evaluated in terms of short-term and long-term stability, linearity with dose, and dose-rate independence. Accuracy was tested by analyzing range of integrated depth-dose curves for a set of representative energies against reference acquisitions in water for proton and carbon ion beams; in addition, 2 modulated proton spread-out Bragg peaks were also measured. Possible methods to increase the native spatial resolution of the detector were also investigated.
RESULTS: Measurements showed a high repeatability: mean relative standard deviation was within 0.5% for all channels and both particle types. The long-term stability of the gain calibration showed discrepancies less than 1% at different times. The detector response was linear with dose (R 2 > 0.99) and independent on the dose rate. Measurements of integrated depth-dose curve ranges revealed a mean deviation from reference measurements in water of 0.1 ± 0.3 mm for protons with a maximum difference of 0.4 mm and 0.2 ± 0.6 mm with maximum difference of 0.85 mm for carbon ion beams. For the 2 modulated proton spread-out Bragg peaks, measured differences in distal dose falloff were ≤0.5 mm against calculated values.
CONCLUSIONS: The detector is stable, linearly responding with dose, precise, and easy to handle for QA beam energy checks of proton and carbon ion beams. © Copyright 2019 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  detector; particle radiation therapy; particle range measurements; quality assurance device

Year:  2019        PMID: 31998821      PMCID: PMC6986401          DOI: 10.14338/IJPT-19-00064.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Part Ther        ISSN: 2331-5180


  19 in total

Review 1.  Dosimetry for ion beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  Christian P Karger; Oliver Jäkel; Hugo Palmans; Tatsuaki Kanai
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  The international commission on radiation units and measurements.

Authors:  Paul M Deluca
Journal:  J ICRU       Date:  2007-06

3.  [Development of a multi-layer ion chamber for measurement of depth dose distributions of heavy-ion therapeutic beam for individual patients].

Authors:  M Shimbo; E Urakabe; Y Futami; K Yusa; H Yamashita; N Matsufuji; T Akagi; A Higashi; T Kanai
Journal:  Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  2000-04

Review 4.  The National Centre for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO): Status and perspectives.

Authors:  Sandro Rossi
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 2.685

5.  Characterization of a commercial scintillation detector for 2-D dosimetry in scanned proton and carbon ion beams.

Authors:  S Russo; A Mirandola; S Molinelli; E Mastella; A Vai; G Magro; A Mairani; D Boi; M Donetti; M Ciocca
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2017-01-22       Impact factor: 2.685

6.  Characterization of a multilayer ionization chamber prototype for fast verification of relative depth ionization curves and spread-out-Bragg-peaks in light ion beam therapy.

Authors:  Alfredo Mirandola; Giuseppe Magro; Marco Lavagno; Andrea Mairani; Silvia Molinelli; Stefania Russo; Edoardo Mastella; Alessandro Vai; Davide Maestri; Vanessa La Rosa; Mario Ciocca
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Dosimetric accuracy assessment of a treatment plan verification system for scanned proton beam radiotherapy: one-year experimental results and Monte Carlo analysis of the involved uncertainties.

Authors:  S Molinelli; A Mairani; A Mirandola; G Vilches Freixas; T Tessonnier; S Giordanengo; K Parodi; M Ciocca; R Orecchia
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 8.  Range uncertainties in proton therapy and the role of Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Evaluation of detectors for acquisition of pristine depth-dose curves in pencil beam scanning.

Authors:  Christian Bäumer; Benjamin Koska; Jamil Lambert; Beate Timmermann; Thierry Mertens; Patrick Takoukam Talla
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Basics of particle therapy II: relative biological effectiveness.

Authors:  Jinhyun Choi; Jin Oh Kang
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2012-03-31
View more
  2 in total

1.  Determination of Integral Depth Dose in Proton Pencil Beam Using Plane-parallel Ionization Chambers.

Authors:  Phatthraporn Thasasi; Sirinya Ruangchan; Puntiwa Oonsiri; Sornjarod Oonsiri
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2022-06-03

2.  Impact of magnetic field regulation in conjunction with the volumetric repainting technique on the spot positions and beam range in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.

Authors:  Suresh Rana; Jaafar Bennouna; Alonso N Gutierrez; Anatoly B Rosenfeld
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.243

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.