Literature DB >> 20952776

Direction information in multiple object tracking is limited by a graded resource.

Todd S Horowitz1, Michael A Cohen.   

Abstract

Is multiple object tracking (MOT) limited by a fixed set of structures (slots), a limited but divisible resource, or both? Here, we answer this question by measuring the precision of the direction representation for tracked targets. The signature of a limited resource is a decrease in precision as the square root of the tracking load. The signature of fixed slots is a fixed precision. Hybrid models predict a rapid decrease to asymptotic precision. In two experiments, observers tracked moving disks and reported target motion direction by adjusting a probe arrow. We derived the precision of representation of correctly tracked targets using a mixture distribution analysis. Precision declined with target load according to the square-root law up to six targets. This finding is inconsistent with both pure and hybrid slot models. Instead, directional information in MOT appears to be limited by a continuously divisible resource.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20952776      PMCID: PMC2957661          DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.7.1765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  56 in total

1.  Areas involved in encoding and applying directional expectations to moving objects.

Authors:  G L Shulman; J M Ollinger; E Akbudak; T E Conturo; A Z Snyder; S E Petersen; M Corbetta
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  How do we track invisible objects?

Authors:  Todd S Horowitz; Randall S Birnkrant; David E Fencsik; Linda Tran; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-06

3.  Tracking unique objects.

Authors:  Todd S Horowitz; Sarah B Klieger; David E Fencsik; Kevin K Yang; George A Alvarez; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-02

4.  A Boolean map theory of visual attention.

Authors:  Liqiang Huang; Harold Pashler
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Loss of positional information when tracking multiple moving dots: the role of visual memory.

Authors:  Sathyasri Narasimhan; Srimant P Tripathy; Brendan T Barrett
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Attentional limits on the perception and memory of visual information.

Authors:  J Palmer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Distinct capacity limits for attention and working memory: Evidence from attentive tracking and visual working memory paradigms.

Authors:  Daryl Fougnie; René Marois
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-06

9.  Distinguishing between parallel and serial accounts of multiple object tracking.

Authors:  Piers D L Howe; Michael A Cohen; Yair Pinto; Todd S Horowitz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Demand-based dynamic distribution of attention and monitoring of velocities during multiple-object tracking.

Authors:  Lucica Iordanescu; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  14 in total

1.  Changing target trajectories influences tracking performance.

Authors:  Justin M Ericson; Melissa R Beck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10

2.  The number and quality of representations in working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-10-10

3.  Why do people appear not to extrapolate trajectories during multiple object tracking? A computational investigation.

Authors:  Sheng-Hua Zhong; Zheng Ma; Colin Wilson; Yan Liu; Jonathan I Flombaum
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Swapping or dropping? Electrophysiological measures of difficulty during multiple object tracking.

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Todd S Horowitz; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-11-07

5.  Delineating the neural signatures of tracking spatial position and working memory during attentive tracking.

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Todd S Horowitz; Jeremy M Wolfe; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Unequal allocation of overt and covert attention in Multiple Object Tracking.

Authors:  Veronica Hadjipanayi; Andria Shimi; Casimir J H Ludwig; Christopher Kent
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 2.157

7.  Misperceptions in the trajectories of objects undergoing curvilinear motion.

Authors:  Ozgur Yilmaz; Srimant P Tripathy; Haluk Ogmen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Enhancing multiple object tracking performance with noninvasive brain stimulation: a causal role for the anterior intraparietal sulcus.

Authors:  Eric J Blumberg; Matthew S Peterson; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-05

9.  Bottlenecks of motion processing during a visual glance: the leaky flask model.

Authors:  Haluk Öğmen; Onur Ekiz; Duong Huynh; Harold E Bedell; Srimant P Tripathy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Additivity of Feature-Based and Symmetry-Based Grouping Effects in Multiple Object Tracking.

Authors:  Chundi Wang; Xuemin Zhang; Yongna Li; Chuang Lyu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.