Literature DB >> 19757910

Demand-based dynamic distribution of attention and monitoring of velocities during multiple-object tracking.

Lucica Iordanescu1, Marcia Grabowecky, Satoru Suzuki.   

Abstract

The ability to track multiple moving objects with attention has been the focus of much research. However, the literature is relatively inconclusive regarding two key aspects of this ability, (1) whether the distribution of attention among the tracked targets is fixed during a period of tracking or is dynamically adjusted, and (2) whether motion information (direction and/or speed) is used to anticipate target locations even when velocities constantly change due to inter-object collisions. These questions were addressed by analyzing target-localization errors. Targets in crowded situations (i.e., those in danger of being lost) were localized more precisely than were uncrowded targets. Furthermore, the response vector (pointing from the target location to the reported location) was tuned to the direction of target motion, and observers with stronger direction tuning localized targets more precisely. Overall, our results provide evidence that multiple-object tracking mechanisms dynamically adjust the spatial distribution of attention in a demand-based manner (allocating more resources to targets in crowded situations) and utilize motion information (especially direction information) to anticipate target locations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19757910      PMCID: PMC2756460          DOI: 10.1167/9.4.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  19 in total

Review 1.  Objects and attention: the state of the art.

Authors:  B J Scholl
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2001-06

2.  Attention maintains mental extrapolation of target position: irrelevant distractors eliminate forward displacement after implied motion.

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-05

3.  Mental extrapolation of target position is strongest with weak motion signals and motor responses.

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Multielement visual tracking: attention and perceptual organization.

Authors:  S Yantis
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Representational momentum and event course anticipation in the perception of implied periodical motions.

Authors:  Karl Verfaillie; Géry d'Ydewalle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Loss of positional information when tracking multiple moving dots: the role of visual memory.

Authors:  Sathyasri Narasimhan; Srimant P Tripathy; Brendan T Barrett
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism.

Authors:  Z W Pylyshyn; R W Storm
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1988

8.  Probing the time course of representational momentum.

Authors:  J J Freyd; J Q Johnson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Mental extrapolation and representational momentum for complex implied motions.

Authors:  R A Finke; G C Shyi
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  The neural representation of speed in macaque area MT/V5.

Authors:  Nicholas J Priebe; Carlos R Cassanello; Stephen G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-07-02       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  30 in total

1.  Visual Attention Modulates Insight Versus Analytic Solving of Verbal Problems.

Authors:  Ezra Wegbreit; Satoru Suzuki; Marcia Grabowecky; John Kounios; Mark Beeman
Journal:  J Probl Solving       Date:  2012

2.  Changing target trajectories influences tracking performance.

Authors:  Justin M Ericson; Melissa R Beck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10

3.  Motion integration for ocular pursuit does not hinder perceptual segregation of moving objects.

Authors:  Zhenlan Jin; Scott N J Watamaniuk; Aarlenne Z Khan; Elena Potapchuk; Stephen J Heinen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Why do people appear not to extrapolate trajectories during multiple object tracking? A computational investigation.

Authors:  Sheng-Hua Zhong; Zheng Ma; Colin Wilson; Yan Liu; Jonathan I Flombaum
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 5.  The COGs (context, object, and goals) in multisensory processing.

Authors:  Sanne ten Oever; Vincenzo Romei; Nienke van Atteveldt; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Micah M Murray; Pawel J Matusz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Swapping or dropping? Electrophysiological measures of difficulty during multiple object tracking.

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Todd S Horowitz; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-11-07

7.  Tracking planets and moons: mechanisms of object tracking revealed with a new paradigm.

Authors:  Michael Tombu; Adriane E Seiffert
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Delineating the neural signatures of tracking spatial position and working memory during attentive tracking.

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Todd S Horowitz; Jeremy M Wolfe; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  A relational structure of voluntary visual-attention abilities.

Authors:  KatieAnn Skogsberg; Marcia Grabowecky; Joshua Wilt; William Revelle; Lucica Iordanescu; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  High-capacity, transient retention of direction-of-motion information for multiple moving objects.

Authors:  Christopher Shooner; Srimant P Tripathy; Harold E Bedell; Haluk Ogmen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.