Literature DB >> 20952151

The safe zone for TransFix fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the anteromedial portal technique.

Timothy J McGlaston1, Vahid Entezari, Ara Nazarian, Arun J Ramappa.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The risk of neurovascular injury is inherent to cross-pin femoral fixation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and has not been evaluated using the anteromedial portal technique; therefore, we determined a safe zone of cross-pin drill angles.
METHODS: Five cadaveric midthigh to midknee specimens underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by use of the anteromedial portal to drill the femoral tunnel and a cross-pin femoral fixation system. Guide pins were passed through the femur at -40°, -20°, 0°, and +20°, with 0° being the coronal plane bisecting the femoral shaft, negative angles when the guide pin started posteriorly, and positive angles when the guide pin started anteriorly. Distances between the guide pin and saphenous nerve, femoral artery, and peroneal nerve were measured. The neurovascular structures were considered safe if the guide pin did not pass within 10 mm of the structures.
RESULTS: The mean distance from pin to saphenous nerve was 74, 61, 21, and 24 mm at -40°, -20°, 0°, and +20°, respectively; pin to femoral artery was 100, 85, 59, and 51 mm, respectively; and pin to peroneal nerve was 40, 50, 65, and 76 mm, respectively. The safe zone for the saphenous nerve was violated at 0° and +20° in 2 of 5 knees, and the safe zone for the femoral artery was violated at +20° in 2 of 5 knees.
CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that a 20° safe zone of rotational angles about the axis of the femoral tunnel, from -40° to -20°, minimizes the risk of damage to the saphenous nerve, femoral artery, and peroneal nerve. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Intraoperative guide-pin angle measurement can be made in reference to the coronal plane of the femur to guide safe drilling of the TransFix guide pin (Arthrex, Naples, FL).
Copyright © 2011 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20952151      PMCID: PMC4405880          DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.06.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  19 in total

1.  Cross-pin femoral fixation versus metal interference screw fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendons: results of a controlled prospective randomized study with 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Arsi Harilainen; Jerker Sandelin; Kim A Jansson
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Tunnel widening after hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is influenced by the type of graft fixation used: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Peter Fauno; Søren Kaalund
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Comparison between different femoral fixation devices for ACL reconstruction with doubled hamstring tendon graft: a biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Milano; Pier Damiano Mulas; Fabio Ziranu; Stefano Piras; Andrea Manunta; Carlo Fabbriciani
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Transverse femoral fixation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with hamstrings grafts: an anatomic study about the relationships between the transcondylar device and the posterolateral structures of the knee.

Authors:  Nicolas Pujol; Thierry David; Thomas Bauer; Philippe Hardy
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Anteromedial portal technique for creating the anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnel.

Authors:  Christopher D Harner; Nicholas J Honkamp; Anil S Ranawat
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Reconstruction technique affects femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Maria K Kaseta; Louis E DeFrate; Brian L Charnock; Robert T Sullivan; William E Garrett
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  ACL reconstruction using the Rigidfix femoral fixation device via the anteromedial portal: a cadaver study to evaluate chondral injuries.

Authors:  Filippo Castoldi; Davide Edoardo Bonasia; Antongiulio Marmotti; Federico Dettoni; Roberto Rossi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Femoral bioabsorbable cross-pin fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Jin Hwan Ahn; Jun Sic Park; Yong Seuk Lee; Young Jin Cho
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Broken femoral cross pin after hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: case report.

Authors:  Neal C Chen; Robert E Boykin; Peter J Millett
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.757

10.  Prospective randomized clinical comparison of femoral transfixation versus bioscrew fixation in hamstring tendon ACL reconstruction--a preliminary report.

Authors:  Tim Rose; Pierre Hepp; Julia Venus; Christoph Stockmar; Christoph Josten; Helmut Lill
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-02-08       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  3 in total

1.  Correlation between fixation systems elasticity and bone tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Nicola Giorgio; Lorenzo Moretti; Paolo Pignataro; Massimiliano Carrozzo; Giovanni Vicenti; Biagio Moretti
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2016-02-12

2.  [Progress of different methods for femoral tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].

Authors:  Biying Huang; Wenyu Deng; Tao Li; Qi Li
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-01-15

3.  Safety of the application of Rigidfix cross-pin system via different tibial tunnels for tibial fixation during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Hua-Qiang Fan; Wenli Dai; Hong-Da Li; Yang-Pan Fu; Zhenhuang Liu; Chang-Ming Huang; Zhanjun Shi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 2.362

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.