Literature DB >> 18157490

ACL reconstruction using the Rigidfix femoral fixation device via the anteromedial portal: a cadaver study to evaluate chondral injuries.

Filippo Castoldi1, Davide Edoardo Bonasia, Antongiulio Marmotti, Federico Dettoni, Roberto Rossi.   

Abstract

The aim of this anatomic descriptive cadaver study is to evaluate the entrance points of cross-pins and the possible chondral damages, using a two cross-pin femoral fixation device via anteromedial portal, during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Twenty fresh-frozen cadaver knees (12 cadavers) were tested. We employed the Rigidfix Cross Pin device (Mitek, Norwood, MA), designed to use two biodegradable pins (PLA, length 42 mm, diameter 2.7 mm). Instead of PLA pins, we used color coded metallic pins. Femoral tunnel drilling and cross-pin guide insertions were performed through the anteromedial portal. We gave three positions to the cross-pin guide: 0 degrees , 45 degrees and 90 degrees slope, referring to the horizontal plane. Per each position, we inserted two metallic pins. We recorded and subdivided the pin holes, in three different groups: Group A (0 degrees ); B (45 degrees ); C (90 degrees of slope). Then a wide dissection has been implemented. Group A: 6 knees (30%) had two pins inside the cartilage of the lateral femoral condyle; 10 knees (50%) had one pin inside the cartilage; and 4 knees (20%) had both pins out of the cartilage. Group B: 7 knees (35%) had two pins inside the cartilage; 12 knees (60%) had one pin inside the cartilage; and one knee (5%) had both pins out of the cartilage. Group C: 7 knees (35%) had two pins inside the cartilage; and 13 knees (65%) had one pin inside the cartilage. The risk of chondral injury, using this technique, is high: from 80% (group A) to 100% (Group C) to have at least one pin inside the cartilage. The use of Rigidfix via AM portal is not recommended for routine ACL reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18157490     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-007-0459-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  10 in total

1.  Biomechanical properties of quadruple tendon and patellar tendon femoral fixation techniques.

Authors:  R Becker; D Voigt; C Stärke; M Heymann; G A Wilson; W Nebelung
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2001-06-21       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The fixation strength of six hamstring tendon graft fixation devices in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part I: femoral site.

Authors:  Petteri Kousa; Teppo L N Järvinen; Mika Vihavainen; Pekka Kannus; Markku Järvinen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Mechanical properties of soft tissue femoral fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Christopher S Ahmad; Thomas R Gardner; Megan Groh; Johnny Arnouk; William N Levine
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004 Apr-May       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the Bio-TransFix femoral fixation device and anteromedial portal technique.

Authors:  Michael E Hantes; Zoe Dailiana; Vasilios C Zachos; Sokratis E Varitimidis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-10-14       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Endoscopic single-incision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon autograft: surgical technique. 1992 [classical article].

Authors:  Gregory T Hardin; Bernard R Bach; Charles A Bush-Joseph; Jack Farr
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.757

6.  Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using bone-patellar tendon-bone graft with double biodegradable femoral pin fixation.

Authors:  Mahir Mahirogullari; Yucel Oguz; Huseyin Ozkan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-01-13       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Isometry testing for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction revisited.

Authors:  C D Morgan; V R Kalmam; D M Grawl
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 8.  The science of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  C B Frank; D W Jackson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Cross-pin femoral fixation: a new technique for hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction of the knee.

Authors:  R Clark; R E Olsen; B J Larson; E M Goble; R P Farrer
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Biomechanical evaluation of a new cross-pin technique for the fixation of different sized bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts.

Authors:  Thore Zantop; Barbara Welbers; Andre Weimann; Markus Rümmler; Jürgen Hedderich; Volker Musahl; Wolf Petersen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2004-06-19       Impact factor: 4.342

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Influence of knee flexion and femoral cross-pin insertion angle on posterolateral structures of the knee and lateral fixation lengths during ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Jin Goo Kim; Yong Seuk Lee; Jeong Ku Ha; Sung Soo Jun; Young Jin Chang
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  The safe zone for TransFix fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the anteromedial portal technique.

Authors:  Timothy J McGlaston; Vahid Entezari; Ara Nazarian; Arun J Ramappa
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament by means of an anteromedial portal and femoral fixation using Rigidfix.

Authors:  André Manoel Inácio; Osmar Valadão Lopes Júnior; André Kuhn; José Idílio Saggin; Paulo Renato Fernandes Saggin; Leandro de Freitas Spinelli; Daniela Medeiros de Castro
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2014-10-22

4.  Comparative Study after Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Endobutton and Rigidfix: A Clinical Trial Study.

Authors:  Hamid Mousavi; Abdellah Maleki; Alireza Nobakht
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2017-11-10

5.  Safe femoral condyle range for the reverse Rigidfix femoral fixation device in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Zhongliu Luo; Yong Hu; Qingmin Han; Zhi Gao; Songmiao Cheng
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.