Literature DB >> 20950801

Dynamic patient position changes during colonoscope withdrawal increase adenoma detection: a randomized, crossover trial.

James E East1, Paul Bassett, Naila Arebi, Siwan Thomas-Gibson, Thomas Guenther, Brian P Saunders.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy has a miss rate for adenomas that may partly relate to poor visualization of the colonic surface. Dynamic position changes during colonoscope withdrawal can improve luminal distension.
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether position changes also improve adenoma and polyp detection.
DESIGN: Randomized crossover clinical trial.
SETTING: Academic endoscopy unit. PATIENTS: This study involved 130 patients who presented for routine colonoscopy. INTERVENTION: Examination either entirely in the left lateral position followed by position changes (cecum to hepatic flexure, left lateral; transverse colon, supine; splenic flexure and descending colon, right lateral) or vice versa. After both examinations, polyps were removed for histopathology. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Proportion of patients with ≥1 polyp or adenoma detected between the hepatic flexure and the sigmoid-descending colon junction. Luminal distension was measured on a scale of 1 to 5: 1, total collapse; 5, fully distended.
RESULTS: At least 1 adenoma was detected in 34% of patients in colon areas in which the patient position differed from left lateral (transverse colon, splenic flexure, descending colon) compared with 23% examined with the patient in the left lateral position alone (P = .01). At least 1 polyp was detected in 52% of patients with position changes versus 34% of patients examined in the left lateral position alone (P < .001). Adenoma and polyp detection were positively correlated with an improved distension score (correlation coefficient, 0.12; P < .001). Adenomas were detected in 16% of colon areas with adequate distension scores (4 and 5) compared with 7% of those with borderline or nondiagnostic scores (1-3; P < .001). LIMITATIONS: Single-operator study.
CONCLUSION: Dynamic position changes during colonoscope withdrawal significantly improved polyp and adenoma detection. ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00234650).
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20950801     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.07.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  39 in total

1.  Dynamic position change at colonoscopy improves adenoma detection.

Authors:  Subrata Ghosh; Marietta Iacucci
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.522

2.  Editorial: Polyps, Pain, and Propofol: Is Water Exchange the Panacea for All?

Authors:  Piet C de Groen
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Response to Zhao et al.

Authors:  Seung-Woo Lee; Jae Hyuck Chang; Jeong-Seon Ji
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Number of significant polyps detected per six-minute withdrawal time at colonoscopy (SP6): a new measure of colonoscopy efficiency and quality.

Authors:  Rajaratnam Rameshshanker; Brian P Saunders
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-01-24

5.  Improving quality in endoscopy: are we nearly there yet?

Authors:  Andy Veitch; Matt Rutter
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02-13

6.  A simple method to improve adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: altering patient position.

Authors:  Aydın Şeref Köksal; Ismail Hakkı Kalkan; Serkan Torun; Ismail Taşkıran; Erkin Öztaş; Ertuğrul Kayaçetin; Nurgül Şaşmaz
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 7.  Seeing better--Evidence based recommendations on optimizing colonoscopy adenoma detection rate.

Authors:  Javier Aranda-Hernández; Jason Hwang; Gabor Kandel
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Comparison of Pentax HiLine and Olympus Lucera systems at screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Alexey Chernolesskiy; David Swain; James C Lee; Gareth D Corbett; Ewen Ab Cameron
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-02-16

9.  Quality colonoscopy: a matter of time, technique or technology?

Authors:  Robert H Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Wireless insufflation of the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Jenna L Gorlewicz; Santina Battaglia; Byron F Smith; Gastone Ciuti; Jason Gerding; Arianna Menciassi; Keith L Obstein; Pietro Valdastri; Robert J Webster
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 4.538

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.