Literature DB >> 26855536

Seeing better--Evidence based recommendations on optimizing colonoscopy adenoma detection rate.

Javier Aranda-Hernández1, Jason Hwang1, Gabor Kandel1.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is one of the three most frequent causes of cancer deaths in men and women in Europe and North America. Diagnosis and resection of adenomas has convincingly demonstrated its utility in diminishing colorectal cancer incidence. Therefore, colonoscopy is now the gold standard for colorectal cancer screening. But it is also known that colonoscopy effectiveness varies among endoscopists. Among different quality indicators, the most used is the adenoma detection rate (ADR) which is the percentage of average-risk patients for colorectal cancer who are found to have at least one adenoma or adenocarcinoma during a screening colonoscopy. There is compelling evidence supporting an inverse correlation between ADR and interval colorectal cancer (cancer found after a screening colonoscopy). Many factors such as quality of precolonoscopy preparation, additional observers, manoeuvres with the endoscope (second view, retroflexion, water inflation rather than air), time spent during withdrawal, changes in patient position, fold-flattener devices, new imaging or endoscopic modalities and use of intravenous or through the scope sprayed drugs, have been studied and developed with the aim of increasing the ADR. This reviews discusses these factors, and the current evidence, to "see better" in the colon and optimize ADR.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenoma; Cancer; Colonoscopy; Detection; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26855536      PMCID: PMC4724608          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i5.1767

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  81 in total

Review 1.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Philip S Schoenfeld; Jonathan Cohen; Irving M Pike; Douglas G Adler; M Brian Fennerty; John G Lieb; Walter G Park; Maged K Rizk; Mandeep S Sawhney; Nicholas J Shaheen; Sachin Wani; David S Weinberg
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Trainee participation is associated with increased small adenoma detection.

Authors:  Anna M Buchner; Muhammad W Shahid; Michael G Heckman; Nancy N Diehl; Rebecca B McNeil; Patrick Cleveland; Kanwar R Gill; Anthony Schore; Marwan Ghabril; Massimo Raimondo; Seth A Gross; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Adenoma detection rates vary minimally with time of day and case rank: a prospective study of 2139 first screening colonoscopies.

Authors:  Daniel A Leffler; Rakhi Kheraj; Arjun Bhansali; Hanako Yamanaka; Naama Neeman; Sunil Sheth; Mandeep Sawhney; J Thomas Lamont; Mark D Aronson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Polypectomy rate is a valid quality measure for colonoscopy: results from a national endoscopy database.

Authors:  Jason E Williams; Jennifer L Holub; Douglas O Faigel
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 5.  Effect of hyoscine N-butylbromide on adenoma detection rate: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Mohammad F Madhoun; Tauseef Ali; William M Tierney; John T Maple
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 7.559

6.  The effect of colonoscopy preparation quality on adenoma detection rates.

Authors:  Eric A Sherer; Timothy D Imler; Thomas F Imperiale
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  High definition colonoscopy vs. standard video endoscopy for the detection of colonic polyps: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  V Subramanian; J Mannath; C J Hawkey; K Ragunath
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 10.093

8.  Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study.

Authors:  Florian Froehlich; Vincent Wietlisbach; Jean-Jacques Gonvers; Bernard Burnand; John-Paul Vader
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  The impact of hyoscine-N-butylbromide on adenoma detection during colonoscopy: meta-analysis of randomized, controlled studies.

Authors:  Emanuele Rondonotti; Oliver Zolk; Arnaldo Amato; Silvia Paggi; Alessandra Baccarin; Giancarlo Spinzi; Franco Radaelli
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  A randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of prescribed patient position changes during colonoscope withdrawal on adenoma detection.

Authors:  George Ou; Edward Kim; Pardis Lakzadeh; Jessica Tong; Robert Enns; Alnoor Ramji; Scott Whittaker; Hin Hin Ko; Brian Bressler; Lawrence Halparin; Eric Lam; Jack Amar; Jennifer Telford
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Personalized Surveillance After Colorectal Adenomatous Polypectomy.

Authors:  Ethna McFerran; James F O'Mahony; Richard Fallis; Duncan McVicar; Ann G Zauber; Frank Kee
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  Annual colonoscopy volume and maintenance of competency for surgeons.

Authors:  David Pace; Mark Borgaonkar; Brad Evans; Curtis Marcoux; Muna Lougheed; Vanessa Falk; Nikita Hickey; Meghan O'Leary; Jerry McGrath; Darrel Boone
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Declining detection rates for APC and biallelic MUTYH variants in polyposis patients, implications for DNA testing policy.

Authors:  Diantha Terlouw; Manon Suerink; Sunny S Singh; Hans J J P Gille; Frederik J Hes; Alexandra M J Langers; Hans Morreau; Hans F A Vasen; Yvonne J Vos; Tom van Wezel; Carli M Tops; Sanne W Ten Broeke; Maartje Nielsen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Is the level of cleanliness using segmental Boston bowel preparation scale associated with a higher adenoma detection rate?

Authors:  Abimbola Adike; Matthew R Buras; Suryakanth R Gurudu; Jonathan A Leighton; Douglas O Faigel; Kevin C Ruff; Sarah B Umar; Francisco C Ramirez
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-01-31

5.  Efficacy of 1.2 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid for bowel preparations.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Tamaki; Teruyo Noda; Masahiro Morita; Akina Omura; Atsushi Kubo; Chikara Ogawa; Toshihiro Matsunaka; Mitsushige Shibatoge
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 1.337

6.  Medical needs related to the endoscopic technology and colonoscopy for colorectal cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Juan Francisco Ortega-Morán; Águeda Azpeitia; Luisa F Sánchez-Peralta; Luis Bote-Curiel; Blas Pagador; Virginia Cabezón; Cristina L Saratxaga; Francisco M Sánchez-Margallo
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Does the withdrawal time affect adenoma detection in non-screening colonoscopies?

Authors:  Ammar Al-Rifaie; Mohammed El-Feki; Ismaeel Al-Talib; Maysam Abdulwahid; Andrew Hopper; Mo Thoufeeq
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-03-16

8.  Predictive factors for missed adenoma on repeat colonoscopy in patients with suboptimal bowel preparation on initial colonoscopy: A KASID multicenter study.

Authors:  Ji Young Chang; Chang Mo Moon; Hyun Jung Lee; Hyo-Joon Yang; Yunho Jung; Sang Wook Kim; Sung-Ae Jung; Jeong-Sik Byeon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Weekend and evening planned colonoscopy activity: a safe and effective way to meet demands.

Authors:  Shimaa A Afify; Omnia M Abo-Elazm; Ishak I Bahbah; Mo H Thoufeeq
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-06-17

10.  Will purposely seeking detect more colorectal polyps than routine performing during colonoscopy?

Authors:  Yanliu Chu; Juan Zhang; Ping Wang; Tian Li; Shuyi Jiang; Qinfu Zhao; Feng Liu; Xiaozhong Gao; Xiuli Qiao; Xiaofeng Wang; Zhenhe Song; Heye Liang; Jing Yue; Enqiang Linghu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.