Literature DB >> 20949442

Differences in patellofemoral kinematics between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions in patients with patellofemoral pain.

Christine E Draper1, Thor F Besier, Michael Fredericson, Juan M Santos, Gary S Beaupre, Scott L Delp, Garry E Gold.   

Abstract

Patellar maltracking is thought to be one source of patellofemoral pain. Measurements of patellar tracking are frequently obtained during non-weight-bearing knee extension; however, pain typically arises during highly loaded activities, such as squatting, stair climbing, and running. It is unclear whether patellofemoral joint kinematics during lightly loaded tasks replicate patellofemoral joint motion during weight-bearing activities. The purpose of this study was to: evaluate differences between upright, weight-bearing and supine, non-weight-bearing joint kinematics in patients with patellofemoral pain; and evaluate whether the kinematics in subjects with maltracking respond differently to weight-bearing than those in nonmaltrackers. We used real-time magnetic resonance imaging to visualize the patellofemoral joint during dynamic knee extension from 30° to 0° of knee flexion during two conditions: upright, weight-bearing and supine, non-weight-bearing. We compared patellofemoral kinematics measured from the images. The patella translated more laterally during the supine task compared to the weight-bearing task for knee flexion angles between 0° and 5° (p = 0.001). The kinematics of the maltrackers responded differently to joint loading than those of the non-maltrackers. In subjects with excessive lateral patellar translation, the patella translated more laterally during upright, weight-bearing knee extension for knee flexion angles between 25° and 30° (p = 0.001). However, in subjects with normal patellar translation, the patella translated more laterally during supine, non-weight-bearing knee extension near full extension (p = 0.001). These results suggest that patellofemoral kinematics measured during supine, unloaded tasks do not accurately represent the joint motion during weight-bearing activities.
Copyright © 2010 Orthopaedic Research Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20949442      PMCID: PMC5407372          DOI: 10.1002/jor.21253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  32 in total

1.  Flexible real-time magnetic resonance imaging framework.

Authors:  Juan M Santos; Graham A Wright; John M Pauly
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2004

2.  Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation.

Authors:  S Ahlbäck
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1968

3.  Patellofemoral joint kinematics in individuals with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Authors:  N J MacIntyre; N A Hill; R A Fellows; R E Ellis; D R Wilson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  Diagnosis and treatment of patients with patellofemoral pain.

Authors:  John P Fulkerson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Evaluation of patellar tracking in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  P O'Donnell; C Johnstone; M Watson; E McNally; S Ostlere
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Quadriceps activation in closed and in open kinetic chain exercise.

Authors:  Ann-Katrin Stensdotter; Paul W Hodges; Rebecca Mellor; Gunnevi Sundelin; Charlotte Häger-Ross
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Patellofemoral joint: identification of abnormalities with active-movement, "unloaded" versus "loaded" kinematic MR imaging techniques.

Authors:  F G Shellock; J H Mink; A L Deutsch; T K Foo; P Sullenberger
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Feasibility of using real-time MRI to measure joint kinematics in 1.5T and open-bore 0.5T systems.

Authors:  Christine E Draper; Juan M Santos; Lampros C Kourtis; Thor F Besier; Michael Fredericson; Gary S Beaupre; Garry E Gold; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Patello-femoral arthralgia in athletes attending a Sports Injury Clinic.

Authors:  M D Devereaux; S M Lachmann
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 13.800

10.  Q-angle and J-sign: indicative of maltracking subgroups in patellofemoral pain.

Authors:  Frances T Sheehan; Aditya Derasari; Kenneth M Fine; Timothy J Brindle; Katharine E Alter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  34 in total

1.  Effects of upright weight bearing and the knee flexion angle on patellofemoral indices using magnetic resonance imaging in patients with patellofemoral instability.

Authors:  Christoph Becher; Benjamin Fleischer; Marten Rase; Thees Schumacher; Max Ettinger; Sven Ostermeier; Tomas Smith
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Upright weight-bearing CT of the knee during flexion: changes of the patellofemoral and tibiofemoral articulations between 0° and 120°.

Authors:  Anna Hirschmann; Florian M Buck; Ramin Herschel; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Sandro F Fucentese
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  The effects of weight-bearing conditions on patellofemoral indices in individuals without and with patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Authors:  Tae-Hoon Kim; Anshul Sobti; Suk-Ha Lee; Jong-Soo Lee; Kwang-Jun Oh
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Upright CT of the knee: the effect of weight-bearing on joint alignment.

Authors:  Anna Hirschmann; Florian M Buck; Sandro F Fucentese; Christian W A Pfirrmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  CURRENT CONCEPTS IN BIOMECHANICAL INTERVENTIONS FOR PATELLOFEMORAL PAIN.

Authors:  Richard W Willy; Erik P Meira
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-12

6.  Load-dependent variations in knee kinematics measured with dynamic MRI.

Authors:  Christopher J Westphal; Anne Schmitz; Scott B Reeder; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Anatomical factors influencing patellar tracking in the unstable patellofemoral joint.

Authors:  Rahul Biyani; John J Elias; Archana Saranathan; Hao Feng; Loredana M Guseila; Melanie A Morscher; Kerwyn C Jones
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Fiducial marker-based correction for involuntary motion in weight-bearing C-arm CT scanning of knees. II. Experiment.

Authors:  Jang-Hwan Choi; Andreas Maier; Andreas Keil; Saikat Pal; Emily J McWalter; Gary S Beaupré; Garry E Gold; Rebecca Fahrig
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Characterization of patellar maltracking using dynamic kinematic CT imaging in patients with patellar instability.

Authors:  Miho J Tanaka; John J Elias; Ariel A Williams; Shadpour Demehri; Andrew J Cosgarea
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Quantitative analysis of the patellofemoral motion pattern using semi-automatic processing of 4D CT data.

Authors:  Daniel Forsberg; Maria Lindblom; Petter Quick; Håkan Gauffin
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 2.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.