Literature DB >> 26482535

Effects of upright weight bearing and the knee flexion angle on patellofemoral indices using magnetic resonance imaging in patients with patellofemoral instability.

Christoph Becher1, Benjamin Fleischer2, Marten Rase3, Thees Schumacher3, Max Ettinger3, Sven Ostermeier4, Tomas Smith3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study analysed the effects of upright weight bearing and the knee flexion angle on patellofemoral indices, determined using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in patients with patellofemoral instability (PI).
METHODS: Healthy volunteers (control group, n = 9) and PI patients (PI group, n = 16) were scanned in an open-configuration MRI scanner during upright weight bearing and supine non-weight bearing positions at full extension (0° flexion) and at 15°, 30°, and 45° flexion. Patellofemoral indices included the Insall-Salvati Index, Caton-Deschamp Index, and Patellotrochlear Index (PTI) to determine patellar height and the patellar tilt angle (PTA), bisect offset (BO), and the tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance to assess patellar rotation and translation with respect to the femur and alignment of the extensor mechanism.
RESULTS: A significant interaction effect of weight bearing by flexion angle was observed for the PTI, PTA, and BO for subjects with PI. At full extension, post hoc pairwise comparisons revealed a significant effect of weight bearing on the indices, with increased patellar height and increased PTA and BO in the PI group. Except for the BO, no such changes were seen in the control group. Independent of weight bearing, flexing the knee caused the PTA, BO, and TT-TG distance to be significantly reduced.
CONCLUSIONS: Upright weight bearing and the knee flexion angle affected patellofemoral MRI indices in PI patients, with significantly increased values at full extension. The observations of this study provide a caution to be considered by professionals when treating PI patients. These patients should be evaluated clinically and radiographically at full extension and various flexion angles in context with quadriceps engagement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Explorative case-control study, Level III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Knee; MRI; Patellar instability; Patellofemoral indices; Weight bearing

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26482535     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3829-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  39 in total

1.  Patellar maltracking correlates with vastus medialis activation delay in patellofemoral pain patients.

Authors:  Saikat Pal; Christine E Draper; Michael Fredericson; Garry E Gold; Scott L Delp; Gary S Beaupre; Thor F Besier
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Patella alta: association with patellofemoral alignment and changes in contact area during weight-bearing.

Authors:  Samuel R Ward; Michael R Terk; Christopher M Powers
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  The tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance; a comparative study between CT and MRI scanning.

Authors:  Philip B Schoettle; Marco Zanetti; Burkart Seifert; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Sandro F Fucentese; Jose Romero
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  The effects of weight-bearing conditions on patellofemoral indices in individuals without and with patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Authors:  Tae-Hoon Kim; Anshul Sobti; Suk-Ha Lee; Jong-Soo Lee; Kwang-Jun Oh
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Measurement of the screw-home motion of the knee is sensitive to errors in axis alignment.

Authors:  S J Piazza; P R Cavanagh
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Value of the tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance in patellar instability in the young athlete.

Authors:  Peter Balcarek; Klaus Jung; Karl-Heinz Frosch; Klaus Michael Stürmer
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Tibiofemoral movement 2: the loaded and unloaded living knee studied by MRI.

Authors:  P F Hill; V Vedi; A Williams; H Iwaki; V Pinskerova; M A Freeman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2000-11

8.  Tibio-femoral movement in the living knee. A study of weight bearing and non-weight bearing knee kinematics using 'interventional' MRI.

Authors:  P Johal; A Williams; P Wragg; D Hunt; W Gedroyc
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Using real-time MRI to quantify altered joint kinematics in subjects with patellofemoral pain and to evaluate the effects of a patellar brace or sleeve on joint motion.

Authors:  Christine E Draper; Thor F Besier; Juan M Santos; Fabio Jennings; Michael Fredericson; Garry E Gold; Gary S Beaupre; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  [Patella infera. Apropos of 128 cases].

Authors:  J Caton; G Deschamps; P Chambat; J L Lerat; H Dejour
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  1982
View more
  9 in total

1.  Clinical Utility of Continuous Radial Magnetic Resonance Imaging Acquisition at 3 T in Real-time Patellofemoral Kinematic Assessment: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Christopher J Burke; Daniel Kaplan; Tobias Block; Gregory Chang; Laith Jazrawi; Kirk Campbell; Michael Alaia
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Sagittal patellar flexion angle: a novel clinically validated patellar height measurement reflecting patellofemoral kinematics useful throughout knee flexion.

Authors:  Michael J Dan; James McMahon; William C H Parr; Nancy Briggs; Samuel MacDessi; Bruce Caldwell; William R Walsh
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Future Directions in Patellofemoral Imaging and 3D Modeling.

Authors:  Navya Dandu; Derrick M Knapik; Nicholas A Trasolini; Athan G Zavras; Adam B Yanke
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2022-04-26

4.  Correlation between Patellar Tilt Angle, Femoral Anteversion and Tibial Tubercle Trochlear Groove Distance Measured by Computer Tomography in Patients with non-Traumatic Recurrent Patellar Dislocation.

Authors:  G Iacobescu; C Cirstoiu; A Cursaru; D Anghelescu; D Stanculescu
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2020-06

5.  Measurement of Tibial Tuberosity-Trochlear Groove Offset Distance by Weightbearing Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scan.

Authors:  John M Marzo; Melissa A Kluczynski; Anthony Notino; Leslie J Bisson
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-10-19

Review 6.  Weight-bearing MRI of the knee: a review of advantages and limits.

Authors:  Federico Bruno; Antonio Barile; Francesco Arrigoni; Antonella Laporta; Anna Russo; Marina Carotti; Alessandra Splendiani; Ernesto Di Cesare; Carlo Masciocchi
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2018-01-19

7.  Alignment differs between patellofemoral osteoarthritis cases and matched controls: An upright 3D MRI study.

Authors:  Erin M Macri; Agnes G d'Entremont; Kay M Crossley; Harvi F Hart; Bruce B Forster; David R Wilson; Charles R Ratzlaff; Charlie H Goldsmith; Karim M Khan
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Correlation of T2* relaxation times of the retropatellar cartilage with tibial tuberosity-trochlea groove distance in professional soccer players.

Authors:  Kai-Jonathan Maas; M Warncke; C Behzadi; G H Welsch; G Schoen; M G Kaul; G Adam; P Bannas; F O Henes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Assessment of the Degree of Osteoarthritis in Aging Male and Female Femoral Condyles: A Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  Jessica Immonen; Kelsey Stevens; Alexa Albin; David Chaus; Lesley Gilmer; Matthew Zdilla
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 3.117

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.