Literature DB >> 8327718

Patellofemoral joint: identification of abnormalities with active-movement, "unloaded" versus "loaded" kinematic MR imaging techniques.

F G Shellock1, J H Mink, A L Deutsch, T K Foo, P Sullenberger.   

Abstract

A positioning device was used to apply a "load" to stress the patellofemoral joint during active-movement, kinematic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Twenty-three symptomatic patellofemoral joints were studied by using "unloaded" versus "loaded" techniques. With the unloaded technique, seven joints were normal, nine had lateral subluxation, three had lateral tilt, and four had medial subluxation. With the loaded technique, one was normal, 13 had lateral subluxation, four had lateral tilt, and five had medial subluxation. The active-movement, loaded kinematic MR imaging technique provides improved ability to identify patellofemoral joint abnormalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8327718     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.188.2.8327718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  10 in total

Review 1.  The effects of weight-bearing conditions on patellofemoral indices in individuals without and with patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Authors:  Tae-Hoon Kim; Anshul Sobti; Suk-Ha Lee; Jong-Soo Lee; Kwang-Jun Oh
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Magnetic resonance cinematography of the fingers: a 3.0 Tesla feasibility study with comparison of incremental and continuous dynamic protocols.

Authors:  Thomas Bayer; Werner Adler; Rolf Janka; Michael Uder; Frank Roemer
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Cine MR imaging before and after realignment surgery for patellar maltracking -- comparison with axial radiographs.

Authors:  J Brossmann; C Muhle; C C Büll; J Zieplies; U H Melchert; G Brinkmann; C Schröder; M Heller
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  MRI of weight bearing and movement.

Authors:  L M Shapiro; G E Gold
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  Differences in patellofemoral kinematics between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions in patients with patellofemoral pain.

Authors:  Christine E Draper; Thor F Besier; Michael Fredericson; Juan M Santos; Gary S Beaupre; Scott L Delp; Garry E Gold
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Evaluation of patellar tracking in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  P O'Donnell; C Johnstone; M Watson; E McNally; S Ostlere
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Feasibility of using real-time MRI to measure joint kinematics in 1.5T and open-bore 0.5T systems.

Authors:  Christine E Draper; Juan M Santos; Lampros C Kourtis; Thor F Besier; Michael Fredericson; Gary S Beaupre; Garry E Gold; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Discrepancies of Patellofemoral Indices between Supine and Standing Merchant Views.

Authors:  Tae-Hoon Kim; Jong-Soo Lee; Kwang-Jun Oh
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2014-02-27

Review 9.  Dynamic MRI to quantify musculoskeletal motion: A systematic review of concurrent validity and reliability, and perspectives for evaluation of musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Bhushan Borotikar; Mathieu Lempereur; Mathieu Lelievre; Valérie Burdin; Douraied Ben Salem; Sylvain Brochard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Accuracy of biplane x-ray imaging combined with model-based tracking for measuring in-vivo patellofemoral joint motion.

Authors:  Michael J Bey; Stephanie K Kline; Scott Tashman; Roger Zauel
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 2.359

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.