Literature DB >> 20947875

Older adults' preferences for independent or delegated end-of-life medical decision making.

Sara M Moorman1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study assesses the proportions of participants who prefer independent or delegated medical decision making at the end of life and examines the relationships of personal beliefs, affiliative beliefs, and end-of-life planning behaviors to decision-making preference.
METHOD: Data are drawn from the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study, a sample of nearly 4,500 healthy White Midwestern high school graduates in their mid-60s.
RESULTS: Four fifths of participants wanted to make decisions independently. Valuing independence, being less avoidant of thoughts of death, and valuing quality of life over length of life had strong associations with a preference for independent decision making. Those concerned about burdening a caregiver wanted to make independent decisions. Persons who both executed a living will and appointed a durable power of attorney for health care preferred independent decision making. DISCUSSION: Older adults cite personal and affiliative beliefs, not lack of autonomy, as reasons for their choice to decide independently or delegate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20947875      PMCID: PMC3060618          DOI: 10.1177/0898264310385114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Aging Health        ISSN: 0898-2643


  36 in total

1.  Enough. The failure of the living will.

Authors:  Angela Fagerlin; Carl E Schneider
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.683

2.  Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients.

Authors:  J Ende; L Kazis; A Ash; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Intensive care, old age, and the problem of death in America.

Authors:  S R Kaufman
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  1998-12

4.  Patients who want their family and physician to make resuscitation decisions for them: observations from SUPPORT and HELP. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. Hospitalized Elderly Longitudinal Project.

Authors:  C M Puchalski; Z Zhong; M M Jacobs; E Fox; J Lynn; J Harrold; A Galanos; R S Phillips; R Califf; J M Teno
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 5.  A life-span theory of control.

Authors:  J Heckhausen; R Schulz
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Prognosis communication in serious illness: perceptions of older patients, caregivers, and clinicians.

Authors:  Terri R Fried; Elizabeth H Bradley; John O'Leary
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Valuing the outcomes of treatment: do patients and their caregivers agree?

Authors:  Terri R Fried; Elizabeth H Bradley; Virginia R Towle
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-09-22

8.  Provision of individualized information to men and their partners to facilitate treatment decision making in prostate cancer.

Authors:  B Joyce Davison; S Larry Goldenberg; Martin E Gleave; Lesley F Degner
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  How strictly do dialysis patients want their advance directives followed?

Authors:  A Sehgal; A Galbraith; M Chesney; P Schoenfeld; G Charles; B Lo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-01-01       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Quality end-of-life care: patients' perspectives.

Authors:  P A Singer; D K Martin; M Kelner
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-01-13       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Drug therapy optimization at the end of life.

Authors:  Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft; Benoit Boland; Lourdes Rexach
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 2.  Psychological well-being revisited: advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia.

Authors:  Carol D Ryff
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 17.659

3.  Advance Care Planning: Contemporary Issues and Future Directions.

Authors:  Deborah Carr; Elizabeth A Luth
Journal:  Innov Aging       Date:  2017-08-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.