Literature DB >> 19441962

The evolutionary enigma of sex.

Sarah P Otto1.   

Abstract

Sexual reproduction entails a number of costs, and yet the majority of eukaryotes engage in sex, at least occasionally. In this article, I review early models to explain the evolution of sex and why they failed to do so. More recent efforts have attempted to account for the complexities of evolution in the real world, with selection that varies over time and space, with differences among individuals in the tendency to reproduce sexually, and with populations that are limited in size. These recent efforts have clarified the conditions that are most likely to explain why sex is so common, as exemplified by the articles in this symposium issue of the American Naturalist.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19441962     DOI: 10.1086/599084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  166 in total

Review 1.  The birds and the bees and the flowers and the trees: lessons from genetic mapping of sex determination in plants and animals.

Authors:  Deborah Charlesworth; Judith E Mank
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Bistability in two-locus models with selection, mutation, and recombination.

Authors:  Su-Chan Park; Joachim Krug
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 2.259

Review 3.  Niche explosion.

Authors:  Benjamin B Normark; Norman A Johnson
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  Higher rates of sex evolve in spatially heterogeneous environments.

Authors:  Lutz Becks; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Spatial heterogeneity in the strength of selection against deleterious alleles and the mutation load.

Authors:  D Roze
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 6.  Evolution of uni- and bifactorial sexual compatibility systems in fungi.

Authors:  B P S Nieuwenhuis; S Billiard; S Vuilleumier; E Petit; M E Hood; T Giraud
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Relative effects of segregation and recombination on the evolution of sex in finite diploid populations.

Authors:  X Jiang; S Hu; Q Xu; Y Chang; S Tao
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Rate of adaptation in sexuals and asexuals: a solvable model of the Fisher-Muller effect.

Authors:  Su-Chan Park; Joachim Krug
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Adaptation through genetic time travel? Fluctuating selection can drive the evolution of bacterial transformation.

Authors:  Jan Engelstädter; Danesh Moradigaravand
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Heterothallism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates from nature: effect of HO locus on the mode of reproduction.

Authors:  Tal Katz Ezov; Shang-Lin Chang; Ze'ev Frenkel; Ayellet V Segrè; Moran Bahalul; Andrew W Murray; Jun-Yi Leu; Abraham Korol; Yechezkel Kashi
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 6.185

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.