Literature DB >> 2094311

Topographic analysis in brain mapping can be compromised by the average reference.

J E Desmedt1, C Tomberg.   

Abstract

The average reference introduces ghost potential fields at the latencies for which the integral of scalp-recorded potentials differs from zero. These spurious effects occur because the average reference is computed from a limited number of (scalp) electrodes which do not survey the bottom half of the head. By arbitrarily re-setting the zero at each latency in the maps to be compared, it can also obliterate or even reverse topographical differences in the case of focal brain potentials enhancements thereby defeating the purpose of brain mapping.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2094311     DOI: 10.1007/bf01128859

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Topogr        ISSN: 0896-0267            Impact factor:   3.020


  32 in total

1.  Origin of scalp far-field N18 of SSEPs in response to median nerve stimulation.

Authors:  E Urasaki; S Wada; C Kadoya; A Yokota; S Matsuoka; F Shima
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb

2.  Emulation of somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) components with the 3-shell head model and the problem of 'ghost potential fields' when using an average reference in brain mapping.

Authors:  J E Desmedt; V Chalklin; C Tomberg
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1990 Jul-Aug

3.  Action potential of the motoneurons of the hypoglossus nucleus.

Authors:  R LORENTE de NO
Journal:  J Cell Comp Physiol       Date:  1947-06

4.  Color imaging of parietal and frontal somatosensory potential fields evoked by stimulation of median or posterior tibial nerve in man.

Authors:  J E Desmedt; M Bourguet
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-01

5.  New method for titrating differences in scalp topographic patterns in brain evoked potential mapping.

Authors:  J E Desmedt; V Chalklin
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct

6.  Current distribution in the brain from surface electrodes.

Authors:  S Rush; D A Driscoll
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1968 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Electrical sources in human somatosensory cortex: identification by combined magnetic and potential recordings.

Authors:  C C Wood; D Cohen; B N Cuffin; M Yarita; T Allison
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-03-01       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields.

Authors:  D Lehmann; W Skrandies
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-06

9.  Non-cephalic reference recording of early somatosensory potentials to finger stimulation in adult or aging normal man: differentiation of widespread N18 and contralateral N20 from the prerolandic P22 and N30 components.

Authors:  J E Desmedt; G Cheron
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-12

10.  Location of sources of evoked scalp potentials: corrections for skull and scalp thicknesses.

Authors:  J P Ary; S A Klein; D H Fender
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 4.538

View more
  5 in total

1.  The scalp distribution of the fractal dimension of the EEG and its variation with mental tasks.

Authors:  W Lutzenberger; T Elbert; N Birbaumer; W J Ray; H Schupp
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Motion-onset auditory-evoked potentials critically depend on history.

Authors:  Ramona Grzeschik; Martin Böckmann-Barthel; Roland Mühler; Michael B Hoffmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  A visual study of surface potentials and Laplacians due to distributed neocortical sources: computer simulations and evoked potentials.

Authors:  P L Nunez; K L Pilgreen; A F Westdorp; S K Law; A V Nelson
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  The timing of temporoparietal and frontal activations during mental own body transformations from different visuospatial perspectives.

Authors:  Lars Schwabe; Bigna Lenggenhager; Olaf Blanke
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Estimating a neutral reference for electroencephalographic recordings: the importance of using a high-density montage and a realistic head model.

Authors:  Quanying Liu; Joshua H Balsters; Marc Baechinger; Onno van der Groen; Nicole Wenderoth; Dante Mantini
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 5.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.