Literature DB >> 20352201

Motion-onset auditory-evoked potentials critically depend on history.

Ramona Grzeschik1, Martin Böckmann-Barthel, Roland Mühler, Michael B Hoffmann.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to determine whether motion history affects motion-onset auditory-evoked potentials (motion-onset AEPs). AEPs were recorded from 33 EEG channels in 16 subjects to the motion onset of a sound (white noise) virtually moving in the horizontal plane at a speed of 60 deg/s from straight ahead to the left (-30 degrees ). AEPs for baseline and adaptation were compared. A stimulus trial comprised three consecutive phases: 2,000 ms adaptation phase, 1,000 ms stationary phase, and 500 ms test phase. During the adaptation phase of the adaptation condition, a sound source moved twice from +30 degrees to -30 degrees to top up preceding adaptation. In the baseline condition, neither top-up nor pre-adaptation were exerted. For both conditions, a stationary sound was presented centrally in the stationary phase, moving leftwards in the test phase. Typical motion-onset AEPs were obtained for the baseline condition, namely a fronto-central response complex dominated by a negative and a positive component, the so-called change-N1 and change-P2 after around 180 and 250 ms, respectively. For the adaptation condition, this complex was shifted significantly into the positive range, indicating that adaptation abolished a negativity within a time window of approximately 160 to 270 ms. A respective shift into the negative range was evident at occipito-parietal sites. In conclusion, while adaptation has to be taken into account as a potential confound in the design of motion-AEP studies, it might also be of benefit in order to isolate AEP correlates of motion processing.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20352201     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2221-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  41 in total

1.  A movement-sensitive area in auditory cortex.

Authors:  F Baumgart; B Gaschler-Markefski; M G Woldorff; H J Heinze; H Scheich
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-08-19       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Enhanced motion aftereffect for complex motions.

Authors:  P J Bex; A B Metha; W Makous
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The effect of trajectory on the auditory motion aftereffect.

Authors:  Michael F Neelon; Rick L Jenison
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Isolating motion responses in visual evoked potentials by preadapting flicker-sensitive mechanisms.

Authors:  J Peter Maurer; Michael Bach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The temporal growth and decay of the auditory motion aftereffect.

Authors:  Michael F Neelon; Rick L Jenison
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Auditory cortex neurons sensitive to correlates of auditory motion: underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  J M Toronchuk; E Stumpf; M S Cynader
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Guideline 5: Guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.177

Review 8.  A primer on motion visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Detection and discrimination of simulated motion of auditory targets in the horizontal plane.

Authors:  D W Grantham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Response of auditory units in the barn owl's inferior colliculus to continuously varying interaural phase differences.

Authors:  A Moiseff; T Haresign
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  2 in total

1.  Sound frequency affects the auditory motion-onset response in humans.

Authors:  Mikaella Sarrou; Pia Marlena Schmitz; Nicole Hamm; Rudolf Rübsamen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Discrimination contours for moving sounds reveal duration and distance cues dominate auditory speed perception.

Authors:  Tom C A Freeman; Johahn Leung; Ella Wufong; Emily Orchard-Mills; Simon Carlile; David Alais
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.