Literature DB >> 1695136

Emulation of somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) components with the 3-shell head model and the problem of 'ghost potential fields' when using an average reference in brain mapping.

J E Desmedt1, V Chalklin, C Tomberg.   

Abstract

In brain topographic mapping, the putative location and orientation in the head space of neural generators are currently inferred from the features of negative and positive scalp potential fields. This procedure requires the use of a fairly neutral reference. The frequently advocated average reference creates problems because its effect is not merely to change a (steady) zero reference level, but to dynamically zero-center all scalp potentials at each latency. Ghost potential fields are thus created at the latencies for which the integral of scalp recorded potentials differs from zero. These distortions of brain mapping have been analyzed with a true 3-shell head model in conjunction with the emulation of SEP components. In the head model, surface potential fields generated by dipoles or dipole sheets of various depths and orientations were computed either over the north hemisphere, so as to emulate scalp recorded SEP components, or over the entire equivalent head sphere. The spurious effects of the average reference are shown to occur because it is computed from a limited number of (scalp) electrodes which fail to survey the bottom half of the head.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1695136     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(90)90063-j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  19 in total

1.  Somatosensory evoked potential correlates of psychophysical magnitude estimations for air-puff stimulation of the foot in man.

Authors:  I Hashimoto; T Gatayama; K Yoshikawa; M Sasaki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Topographic analysis in brain mapping can be compromised by the average reference.

Authors:  J E Desmedt; C Tomberg
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Input-output relation of the somatosensory system for mechanical air-puff stimulation of the index finger in man.

Authors:  I Hashimoto; T Gatayama; K Yoshikawa; M Sasaki; M Nomura
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Somatosensory evoked potential correlates of psychophysical magnitude estimations for air-puff stimulation of the face in man.

Authors:  I Hashimoto; T Gatayama; K Yoshikawa; M Sasaki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Neuromagnetic investigation of somatotopy of human hand somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  C Baumgartner; A Doppelbauer; L Deecke; D S Barth; J Zeitlhofer; G Lindinger; W W Sutherling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  A visual study of surface potentials and Laplacians due to distributed neocortical sources: computer simulations and evoked potentials.

Authors:  P L Nunez; K L Pilgreen; A F Westdorp; S K Law; A V Nelson
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  The effect of ground electrode on the sensitivity, symmetricity and technical feasibility of scalp EEG recordings.

Authors:  Antti Kimmo Olavi Paukkunen; Raimo Sepponen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Scalp topography of somatosensory evoked potentials following median and posterior tibial nerve stimulation in Down's syndrome.

Authors:  R Kakigi; H Shibasaki
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  Three dimensional representation of brain electrical activity.

Authors:  V Medina; F Hassainia; F Langevin; P Gaillard
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  Adaptive Laplacian filtering for sensorimotor rhythm-based brain-computer interfaces.

Authors:  Jun Lu; Dennis J McFarland; Jonathan R Wolpaw
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.