Literature DB >> 20941639

Determining patient preferences for remote monitoring.

Nuri Basoglu1, Tugrul U Daim, Umit Topacan.   

Abstract

This paper presents the patient preferences for an application in remote health monitoring. The data was collected through a mobile service prototype. Analytical Hierarchy Process and Conjoint Analysis were used to extract the patient preferences. The study was limited to diabetes and obesity patients in Istanbul, Turkey. Results indicated that sending users' data automatically, availability of technical support, and price are key factors impacting patient's decisions. This implies that e-health service providers and designers should focus on the services that enable users to send measurement results automatically instead of manually.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20941639     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-010-9601-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  35 in total

Review 1.  A review on diffusion of personal digital assistants in healthcare.

Authors:  Craig E Kuziemsky; Francis Laul; Raymond C Leung
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  A new hybrid model for exploring the adoption of online nursing courses.

Authors:  Feng-Cheng Tung; Su-Chao Chang
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 3.442

3.  Adoption of telemedicine in Scottish remote and rural general practices: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Gerry King; Helen Richards; David Godden
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.184

4.  The value proposition in the widespread use of telehealth.

Authors:  Caitlin M Cusack; Eric Pan; Julie M Hook; Adam Vincent; David C Kaelber; Blackford Middleton
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.184

5.  Ubiquitous healthcare service using Zigbee and mobile phone for elderly patients.

Authors:  Hak Jong Lee; Sun Hee Lee; Kyoo-Seob Ha; Hak Chul Jang; Woo-Young Chung; Ju Young Kim; Yoon-Seok Chang; Dong Hyun Yoo
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 4.046

6.  Managerial control vs professional autonomy: an empirical study on perceptions and expectations of physicians at teaching hospitals in Turkey.

Authors:  Mustafa Kilic; Mahmut Arslan; Dogan Nadi Leblebici; Mehmet Devrim Aydin; M Kemal Oktem
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Determinants of Internet use as a preferred source of information on personal health.

Authors:  Marc Lemire; Guy Paré; Claude Sicotte; Charmian Harvey
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 4.046

8.  Assessing the quality of a web-based learning system for nurses.

Authors:  Chi-Yuan Chen; Ray-E Chang; Ming-Chien Hung; Mei-Hsin Lin
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  Barriers to accepting e-prescribing in the U.S.A.

Authors:  Alan D Smith
Journal:  Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv       Date:  2006

10.  A human resource planning model for hospital/medical technologists: an analytic hierarchy process approach.

Authors:  N K Kwak; K J McCarthy; G E Parker
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.460

View more
  10 in total

1.  Perception of Influencing Factors on Acceptance of Mobile Health Monitoring Service: A Comparison between Users and Non-users.

Authors:  Jaebeom Lee; Mi Jung Rho
Journal:  Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2013-09-30

Review 2.  Electronic Assessment of Physical Decline in Geriatric Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Ramin Fallahzadeh; Hassan Ghasemzadeh; Armin Shahrokni
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Using mHealth Tools to Improve Rural Diabetes Care Guided by the Chronic Care Model.

Authors:  Jennifer A Mallow; Laurie A Theeke; Emily R Barnes; Tara Whetsel; Brian K Mallow
Journal:  Online J Rural Nurs Health Care       Date:  2014

4.  A 3-Month Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial of a Patient-Centered, Computer-Based Self-Monitoring System for the Care of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Hypertension.

Authors:  Calvin Or; Da Tao
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 5.  The patient perspective of diabetes care: a systematic review of stated preference research.

Authors:  Lill-Brith von Arx; Trine Kjeer
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Antecedents of Intention to Adopt Mobile Health (mHealth) Application and Its Impact on Intention to Recommend: An Evidence from Indonesian Customers.

Authors:  Gilbert Sterling Octavius; Ferdi Antonio
Journal:  Int J Telemed Appl       Date:  2021-04-30

7.  Cardiac patients show high interest in technology enabled cardiovascular rehabilitation.

Authors:  Roselien Buys; Jomme Claes; Deirdre Walsh; Nils Cornelis; Kieran Moran; Werner Budts; Catherine Woods; Véronique A Cornelissen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  Study protocol: mobile improvement of self-management ability through rural technology (mI SMART).

Authors:  Jennifer A Mallow; Laurie A Theeke; Dustin M Long; Tara Whetsel; Elliott Theeke; Brian K Mallow
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-08-16

Review 9.  Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process in healthcare research: A systematic literature review and evaluation of reporting.

Authors:  Katharina Schmidt; Ines Aumann; Ines Hollander; Kathrin Damm; J-Matthias Graf von der Schulenburg
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  User-Centered Adaptation of an Existing Heart Failure Telemonitoring Program to Ensure Sustainability and Scalability: Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Patrick Ware; Heather J Ross; Joseph A Cafazzo; Audrey Laporte; Kayleigh Gordon; Emily Seto
Journal:  JMIR Cardio       Date:  2018-12-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.