Literature DB >> 18078547

Adoption of telemedicine in Scottish remote and rural general practices: a qualitative study.

Gerry King1, Helen Richards, David Godden.   

Abstract

We conducted a qualitative interview study to explore the factors that have facilitated and prevented the adoption of telemedicine in general practice in remote and rural Scotland. Face-to-face interviews were carried out with general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses in 26 of Scotland's most remote practices and five of the seven most rural health boards. The interview study found that GPs were more positive about the use of computers and telemedicine than nurses. Although electronic access to simple data, such as laboratory results, had become widely accepted, most respondents had very little experience of more sophisticated telemedicine applications, such as videoconferencing. There was widespread scepticism about the potential usefulness of clinical applications of telemedicine, although it was perceived to have potential benefit in facilitating access to educational resources. A number of barriers to the adoption of telemedicine were reported, including concerns that videoconferencing could diminish the quality of communication in educational and clinical settings, and that telemedicine would not fit easily with the organizational routines of the practices. Policy-makers should prioritize strategies to develop educational programmes, as these are more likely to succeed than clinical initiatives. It may then follow that clinicians will see opportunities for use in their clinical work.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18078547     DOI: 10.1258/135763307783064430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Telemed Telecare        ISSN: 1357-633X            Impact factor:   6.184


  9 in total

1.  Determining patient preferences for remote monitoring.

Authors:  Nuri Basoglu; Tugrul U Daim; Umit Topacan
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Exploring public perspectives on e-health: findings from two citizen juries.

Authors:  Gerry King; David J Heaney; David Boddy; Catherine A O'Donnell; Julia S Clark; Frances S Mair
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Evaluating complex interventions and health technologies using normalization process theory: development of a simplified approach and web-enabled toolkit.

Authors:  Carl R May; Tracy Finch; Luciana Ballini; Anne MacFarlane; Frances Mair; Elizabeth Murray; Shaun Treweek; Tim Rapley
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  'Massive potential' or 'safety risk'? Health worker views on telehealth in the care of older people and implications for successful normalization.

Authors:  Wendy Shulver; Maggie Killington; Maria Crotty
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Experience of nurses with using eHealth in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan: a qualitative study in primary and secondary healthcare.

Authors:  Saleema Gulzar; Shariq Khoja; Afroz Sajwani
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2013-03-02

6.  Arduous implementation: does the Normalisation Process Model explain why it's so difficult to embed decision support technologies for patients in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; France Légaré; Trudy van der Weijden; Adrian Edwards; Carl May
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 7.327

7.  Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory.

Authors:  Carl R May; Frances Mair; Tracy Finch; Anne MacFarlane; Christopher Dowrick; Shaun Treweek; Tim Rapley; Luciana Ballini; Bie Nio Ong; Anne Rogers; Elizabeth Murray; Glyn Elwyn; France Légaré; Jane Gunn; Victor M Montori
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  The views of health-care personnel about video consultation prior to implementation in primary health care in rural areas.

Authors:  Annette M Johansson; Inger Lindberg; Siv Söderberg
Journal:  Prim Health Care Res Dev       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 1.458

9.  Factors Determining the Success and Failure of eHealth Interventions: Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Conceição Granja; Wouter Janssen; Monika Alise Johansen
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 5.428

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.