Literature DB >> 18461819

Managerial control vs professional autonomy: an empirical study on perceptions and expectations of physicians at teaching hospitals in Turkey.

Mustafa Kilic1, Mahmut Arslan, Dogan Nadi Leblebici, Mehmet Devrim Aydin, M Kemal Oktem.   

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of work context on professional job processes in large organizations in general, and the differences of perceptions and expectations of physicians for professional autonomy in different work environments in specific. An empirical study was conducted on "perceptions and expectations of physicians" in terms of their control over diagnosis and treatment process in different teaching hospitals in Turkey. Results exhibit that the difference between expectation and perception on "the control over diagnosis and treatment process", one of the crucial elements in professional autonomy of physicians, is statistically significant among the surveyed hospitals. The reason of this difference seems to be the managerial practices of each organization. Thus, the study emphasizes the need of assessing the problematic job procedures and of changing them with the most effective ones to create a synergy instead of conflict in the work setting. This synergy in the health care organizations means a balance between managerial control and professional autonomy and a better health service to the patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18461819     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-007-9118-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  12 in total

1.  Autonomy: an important component for nurses' job satisfaction.

Authors:  C P Finn
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.837

2.  Autonomy in the medical profession in the United Kingdom--an historical perspective.

Authors:  J S Horner
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2000

3.  Australian general practitioners: desperately seeking satisfaction.

Authors:  M Chew; A Williams
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2001-07-16       Impact factor: 7.738

4.  Physician autonomy in the Federal Republic of Germany, Great Britain and the United States.

Authors:  R Schulz; R Harrison
Journal:  Int J Health Plann Manage       Date:  1986 Oct-Dec

5.  Reform and autonomy: perceptions of the Australian general practice community.

Authors:  Tim Marjoribanks; Jenny M Lewis
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Process and structure: resource management and the development of sub-unit organisational structure.

Authors:  T Packwood; J Keen; M Buxton
Journal:  Health Serv Manage Res       Date:  1992-03

7.  A re-examination of the hypothesis of physician deprofessionalization.

Authors:  M R Haug
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.911

8.  The effect of bureaucracy on the professional autonomy of the physician.

Authors:  G V Engel
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1969-03

Review 9.  Managing professional work: three models of control for health organizations.

Authors:  W R Scott
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Are teamwork and professional autonomy compatible, and do they result in improved hospital care?

Authors:  A M Rafferty; J Ball; L H Aiken
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-12
View more
  2 in total

1.  Determining patient preferences for remote monitoring.

Authors:  Nuri Basoglu; Tugrul U Daim; Umit Topacan
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Physicians' professional autonomy and their organizational identification with their hospital.

Authors:  Domenico Salvatore; Dino Numerato; Giovanni Fattore
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 2.655

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.