Jennifer A Mallow1, Laurie A Theeke2, Emily R Barnes3, Tara Whetsel4, Brian K Mallow5. 1. West Virginia University School of Nursing, jamallow@hsc.wvu.edu. 2. West Virginia University School of Nursing, ltheeke@hsc.wvu.edu. 3. West Virginia University School of Pharmacy, ebarnes@hsc.wvu.edu. 4. West Virginia University School of Nursing, twhetsel@hsc.wvu.edu. 5. Sovern Run LLC, bkmallow@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Used as an integrated tool, mHealth may improve the ability of healthcare providers in rural areas to provide care, improve access to care for underserved populations, and improve biophysical outcomes of care for persons with diabetes in rural, underserved populations. Our objective in this paper is to present an integrated review of the impact of mHealth interventions for community dwelling individuals with type two diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was performed using keywords in PubMed to identify research studies which mHealth technology was used as the intervention. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Interventions using mHealth have been found to improve outcomes, be cost effective, and culturally relevant. mHealth technology that has been used to improve outcomes include: seeking out health information via the web, access to appointment scheduling and medication refills, secure messaging, computerized interventions to manage a chronic condition, use of a personal health record, use of remote monitoring devices, and seeking support from others with similar health concerns through social networks. CONCLUSION: Using the validated Chronic Care Model to translate what is known about mHealth technology to clinical practice has the potential to improve the ability of healthcare providers in rural areas to provide care, improve access to care for underserved populations, and improve biophysical outcomes of care for persons with diabetes in rural underserved populations. While these approaches were effective in improving some outcomes, they have not resulted in the establishment of the necessary electronic infrastructure for a sustainable mobile healthcare delivery model.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Used as an integrated tool, mHealth may improve the ability of healthcare providers in rural areas to provide care, improve access to care for underserved populations, and improve biophysical outcomes of care for persons with diabetes in rural, underserved populations. Our objective in this paper is to present an integrated review of the impact of mHealth interventions for community dwelling individuals with type two diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was performed using keywords in PubMed to identify research studies which mHealth technology was used as the intervention. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Interventions using mHealth have been found to improve outcomes, be cost effective, and culturally relevant. mHealth technology that has been used to improve outcomes include: seeking out health information via the web, access to appointment scheduling and medication refills, secure messaging, computerized interventions to manage a chronic condition, use of a personal health record, use of remote monitoring devices, and seeking support from others with similar health concerns through social networks. CONCLUSION: Using the validated Chronic Care Model to translate what is known about mHealth technology to clinical practice has the potential to improve the ability of healthcare providers in rural areas to provide care, improve access to care for underserved populations, and improve biophysical outcomes of care for persons with diabetes in rural underserved populations. While these approaches were effective in improving some outcomes, they have not resulted in the establishment of the necessary electronic infrastructure for a sustainable mobile healthcare delivery model.
Entities:
Keywords:
Chronic Care model; Diabetes; Rural; mHealth
Authors: Elsayed Z Soliman; George Howard; James F Meschia; Mary Cushman; Paul Muntner; Patrick M Pullicino; Leslie A McClure; Suzanne Judd; Virginia J Howard Journal: Stroke Date: 2011-08-04 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Jewell H Halanych; Faisal Shuaib; Gaurav Parmar; Rajasekhar Tanikella; Virginia J Howard; David L Roth; Ronald J Prineas; Monika M Safford Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2011-05-03 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Courtney Rees Lyles; Lynne T Harris; Tung Le; Jan Flowers; James Tufano; Diane Britt; James Hoath; Irl B Hirsch; Harold I Goldberg; James D Ralston Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2011-03-15 Impact factor: 6.118
Authors: H J Yoo; M S Park; T N Kim; S J Yang; G J Cho; T G Hwang; S H Baik; D S Choi; G H Park; K M Choi Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 4.359
Authors: Suzanne E Judd; Leslie A McClure; Virginia J Howard; Daniel T Lackland; Jewell H Halanych; Edmond K Kabagambe Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2011-05-17 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Youfa Wang; Jungwon Min; Jacob Khuri; Hong Xue; Bo Xie; Leonard A Kaminsky; Lawrence J Cheskin Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2020-04-28 Impact factor: 4.773
Authors: Zenong Yin; Vanessa L Errisuriz; Martin Evans; Devasena Inupakutika; Sahak Kaghyan; Shiyu Li; Laura Esparza; David Akopian; Deborah Parra-Medina Journal: JMIR Form Res Date: 2020-08-20
Authors: Stephen M Davis; Amanda Jones; Margaret E Jaynes; Kori N Woodrum; Marcus Canaday; Lindsay Allen; Jennifer A Mallow Journal: BMC Nurs Date: 2020-02-04