Literature DB >> 20939788

Protein flexibility and ligand recognition: challenges for molecular modeling.

Francesca Spyrakis1, Axel BidonChanal, Xavier Barril, F Javier Luque.   

Abstract

The intrinsic dynamics of macromolecules is an essential property to relate the structure of biomolecular systems with their function in the cell. In the field of ligand-receptor recognition, numerous evidences have revealed the limitations of the lock-and-key theory, and the need to elaborate models that take into account the inherent plasticity of biomolecules, such as the induced-fit model or the existence of an ensemble of pre-equilibrated conformations. Depending on the nature of the target system, ligand binding can be associated with small local adjustments in side chains or even the backbone to large-scale motions of structural fragments, domains or even subunits. Reproducing the inherent flexibility of biomolecules has thus become one of the most challenging issues in molecular modeling and simulation studies, as it has direct implications in our understanding of the structure-function relationships, but even in areas such as virtual screening and structure-based drug discovery. Given the intrinsic limitation of conventional simulation tools, only events occurring in short time scales can be reproduced at a high accuracy level through all-atom techniques such as Molecular Dynamics simulations. However, larger structural rearrangements demand the use of enhanced sampling methods relying on modified descriptions of the biomolecular system or the potential surface. This review illustrates the crucial role that structural plasticity plays in mediating ligand recognition through representative examples. In addition, it discusses some of the most powerful computational tools developed to characterize the conformational flexibility in ligand-receptor complexes.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20939788     DOI: 10.2174/156802611794863571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem        ISSN: 1568-0266            Impact factor:   3.295


  25 in total

1.  Molecular simulation methods in drug discovery: a prospective outlook.

Authors:  Xavier Barril; F Javier Luque
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 2.  Viral quasispecies evolution.

Authors:  Esteban Domingo; Julie Sheldon; Celia Perales
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 11.056

3.  Balancing target flexibility and target denaturation in computational fragment-based inhibitor discovery.

Authors:  Theresa J Foster; Alexander D MacKerell; Olgun Guvench
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  Docking-undocking combination applied to the D3R Grand Challenge 2015.

Authors:  Sergio Ruiz-Carmona; Xavier Barril
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 5.  Beauty is skin deep: a surface monolayer perspective on nanoparticle interactions with cells and bio-macromolecules.

Authors:  Krishnendu Saha; Avinash Bajaj; Bradley Duncan; Vincent M Rotello
Journal:  Small       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 13.281

6.  POVME 3.0: Software for Mapping Binding Pocket Flexibility.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Wagner; Jesper Sørensen; Nathan Hensley; Celia Wong; Clare Zhu; Taylor Perison; Rommie E Amaro
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 6.006

7.  The Fundamental Role of Flexibility on the Strength of Molecular Binding.

Authors:  Christopher Forrey; Jack F Douglas; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  Soft Matter       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 3.679

8.  Computational and experimental studies of the interaction between phospho-peptides and the C-terminal domain of BRCA1.

Authors:  Victor M Anisimov; Arturas Ziemys; Smitha Kizhake; Ziyan Yuan; Amarnath Natarajan; Claudio N Cavasotto
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 9.  Bioinformatics and variability in drug response: a protein structural perspective.

Authors:  Jennifer L Lahti; Grace W Tang; Emidio Capriotti; Tianyun Liu; Russ B Altman
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Exquisite selectivity for human toll-like receptor 8 in substituted furo[2,3-c]quinolines.

Authors:  Hari Prasad Kokatla; Diptesh Sil; Subbalakshmi S Malladi; Rajalakshmi Balakrishna; Alec R Hermanson; Lauren M Fox; Xinkun Wang; Anshuman Dixit; Sunil A David
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 7.446

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.