Literature DB >> 22641475

Balancing target flexibility and target denaturation in computational fragment-based inhibitor discovery.

Theresa J Foster1, Alexander D MacKerell, Olgun Guvench.   

Abstract

Accounting for target flexibility and selecting "hot spots" most likely to be able to bind an inhibitor continue to be challenges in the field of structure-based drug design, especially in the case of protein-protein interactions. Computational fragment-based approaches using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are a promising emerging technology having the potential to address both of these challenges. However, the optimal MD conditions permitting sufficient target flexibility while also avoiding fragment-induced target denaturation remain ambiguous. Using one such technology (Site Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation, SILCS), conditions were identified to either prevent denaturation or identify and exclude trajectories in which subtle but important denaturation was occurring. The target system used was the well-characterized protein cytokine IL-2, which is involved in a protein-protein interface and, in its unliganded crystallographic form, lacks surface pockets that can serve as small-molecule binding sites. Nonetheless, small-molecule inhibitors have previously been discovered that bind to two "cryptic" binding sites that emerge only in the presence of ligand binding, highlighting the important role of IL-2 flexibility. Using the above conditions, SILCS with hydrophobic fragments was able to identify both sites based on favorable fragment binding while avoiding IL-2 denaturation. An important additional finding was that acetonitrile, a water-miscible fragment, fails to identify either site yet can induce target denaturation, highlighting the importance of fragment choice.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22641475      PMCID: PMC3438888          DOI: 10.1002/jcc.23026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  64 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Small-molecule inhibitors of protein-protein interactions: progressing towards the dream.

Authors:  Michelle R Arkin; James A Wells
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 3.  Computational identification of inhibitors of protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Shijun Zhong; Alba T Macias; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 4.  Methods for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites for structure-based drug design and virtual ligand screening.

Authors:  Alasdair T R Laurie; Richard M Jackson
Journal:  Curr Protein Pept Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.272

5.  Binding response: a descriptor for selecting ligand binding site on protein surfaces.

Authors:  Shijun Zhong; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 6.  Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative.

Authors:  Maxim Totrov; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 6.809

7.  A novel and efficient tool for locating and characterizing protein cavities and binding sites.

Authors:  Ashutosh Tripathi; Glen E Kellogg
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-03

8.  Detection of pockets on protein surfaces using small and large probe spheres to find putative ligand binding sites.

Authors:  Takeshi Kawabata; Nobuhiro Go
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2007-08-01

9.  Identification of small molecular weight inhibitors of Src homology 2 domain-containing tyrosine phosphatase 2 (SHP-2) via in silico database screening combined with experimental assay.

Authors:  Wen-Mei Yu; Olgun Guvench; Alexander D Mackerell; Cheng-Kui Qu
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 7.446

10.  Fpocket: an open source platform for ligand pocket detection.

Authors:  Vincent Le Guilloux; Peter Schmidtke; Pierre Tuffery
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Computational functional group mapping for drug discovery.

Authors:  Olgun Guvench
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 2.  Driving Structure-Based Drug Discovery through Cosolvent Molecular Dynamics.

Authors:  Phani Ghanakota; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Pharmacophore modeling using site-identification by ligand competitive saturation (SILCS) with multiple probe molecules.

Authors:  Wenbo Yu; Sirish Kaushik Lakkaraju; E Prabhu Raman; Lei Fang; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Computer-Aided Drug Design Methods.

Authors:  Wenbo Yu; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2017

5.  Site-Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation (SILCS) assisted pharmacophore modeling.

Authors:  Wenbo Yu; Sirish Kaushik Lakkaraju; E Prabhu Raman; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Novel Noncatalytic Substrate-Selective p38α-Specific MAPK Inhibitors with Endothelial-Stabilizing and Anti-Inflammatory Activity.

Authors:  Nirav G Shah; Mohan E Tulapurkar; Aparna Ramarathnam; Amanda Brophy; Ramon Martinez; Kellie Hom; Theresa Hodges; Ramin Samadani; Ishwar S Singh; Alexander D MacKerell; Paul Shapiro; Jeffrey D Hasday
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 5.422

7.  Identifying binding hot spots on protein surfaces by mixed-solvent molecular dynamics: HIV-1 protease as a test case.

Authors:  Peter M U Ung; Phani Ghanakota; Sarah E Graham; Katrina W Lexa; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.505

8.  Improving protocols for protein mapping through proper comparison to crystallography data.

Authors:  Katrina W Lexa; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 9.  The evolution of S100B inhibitors for the treatment of malignant melanoma.

Authors:  Kira G Hartman; Laura E McKnight; Melissa A Liriano; David J Weber
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.808

10.  Assessing hERG1 Blockade from Bayesian Machine-Learning-Optimized Site Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation Simulations.

Authors:  Mahdi Mousaei; Meruyert Kudaibergenova; Alexander D MacKerell; Sergei Noskov
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 4.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.