Literature DB >> 3739237

Selective losses in binocular vision in anisometropic amblyopes.

K Holopigian, R Blake, M J Greenwald.   

Abstract

Human anisometropic amblyopes typically exhibit reduced contrast sensitivity in the amblyopic eye, especially at higher spatial frequencies. We determined whether this spatial frequency selective loss in contrast sensitivity is accompanied by selective losses in binocular function. Binocular summation (the improvement in one eye's detection performance produced by a subthreshold pattern presented to the fellow eye) was measured at several spatial frequencies. Normal observers exhibited equivalent binouclar summation at all spatial frequencies, whereas all anisometropic amblyopes exhibited normal summation at low spatial frequencies but none at high spatial frequencies. Stereoacuity (minimum resolvable disparity) was also measured as a function of spatial frequency. For normal observers, stereoacuity was best at the highest spatial frequency; for anisometropes stereoacuity was normal at low spatial frequencies, subnormal at intermediate spatial frequencies, and unmeasurable at higher spatial frequencies. Anisometropia may represent a form of selective binocular deprivation that affects neural mechanisms underlying binocular summation and stereopsis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3739237     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(86)90010-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  22 in total

1.  Binocular contrast summation and inhibition in amblyopia. The influence of the interocular difference on binocular contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  S Pardhan; J Gilchrist
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 2.  Physiology of suppression in strabismic amblyopia.

Authors:  R Harrad; F Sengpiel; C Blakemore
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Effects of anisometropic amblyopia on visuomotor behavior, I: saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo; Herbert C Goltz; Manokaraananthan Chandrakumar; Zahra A Hirji; Agnes M F Wong
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 4.  Stereopsis and amblyopia: A mini-review.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi; David C Knill; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  The relationship between anisometropia, patient age, and the development of amblyopia.

Authors:  Sean P Donahue
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2005

6.  Perceived suprathreshold depth under conditions that elevate the stereothreshold.

Authors:  Harold E Bedell; Liat Gantz; Danielle N Jackson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Effects of temporal frequency on binocular deficits in amblyopia.

Authors:  Anna Kosovicheva; Adriana Ferreira; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  The dependence of binocular contrast sensitivities on binocular single vision in normal and amblyopic human subjects.

Authors:  A S Hood; J D Morrison
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Validation of dynamic random dot stereotests in pediatric vision screening.

Authors:  Anna Budai; András Czigler; Eszter Mikó-Baráth; Vanda A Nemes; Gábor Horváth; Ágota Pusztai; David P Piñero; Gábor Jandó
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Binocular combination in anisometropic amblyopia.

Authors:  Chang-Bing Huang; Jiawei Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu; Lixia Feng; Yifeng Zhou
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.