Literature DB >> 20930867

MRI for men undergoing active surveillance or with rising PSA and negative biopsies.

Orit Raz1, Masoom Haider, John Trachtenberg, Dan Leibovici, Nathan Lawrentschuk.   

Abstract

The role of imaging in treatment decision-making for patients with prostate cancer is to characterize the cancer already diagnosed on biopsy, to determine tumor location, to assess tumor volume, and to exclude more-extensive disease. MRI is currently the most established imaging modality for this purpose, with the highest sensitivity and specificity for detection and staging of prostate tumors. The development and wider adoption of active surveillance and focal treatment approaches would also benefit from accurate localization of cancer. As such, 3 T MRI and multiparametric approaches are being developed as tools for the localization and staging of prostate cancer. Men wishing to commence or remain on active surveillance might benefit by having larger cancers identified before embarking on this management strategy. MRI might have its greatest role in patients where there is a discrepancy between PSA and biopsy results suggesting a potential missed prostate tumor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20930867     DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2010.143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Urol        ISSN: 1759-4812            Impact factor:   14.432


  72 in total

1.  Implications of stage-specific survival rates in assessing recent declines in prostate cancer mortality rates.

Authors:  R E Tarone; K C Chu; O W Brawley
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Dynamic MRI and CAD vs. choline MRS: where is the detection level for a lesion characterisation in prostate cancer?

Authors:  Michael Schmuecking; Carsten Boltze; Hagen Geyer; Henning Salz; Bert Schilling; Thomas G Wendt; Karl-Heinz Kloetzer; Christiane Marx
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.694

3.  Feasibility study: watchful waiting for localized low to intermediate grade prostate carcinoma with selective delayed intervention based on prostate specific antigen, histological and/or clinical progression.

Authors:  Richard Choo; Laurence Klotz; Cyril Danjoux; Gerard C Morton; Gerrit DeBoer; Ewa Szumacher; Neil Fleshner; Peter Bunting; George Hruby
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Clinical stage B prostate carcinoma: staging with MR imaging.

Authors:  P R Biondetti; J K Lee; D Ling; W J Catalona
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  In vivo measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in normal and malignant prostatic tissues using echo-planar imaging.

Authors:  Bashar Issa
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Accuracy of 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging for the staging of prostate cancer in comparison to the Partin tables.

Authors:  H Augustin; G A Fritz; T Ehammer; M Auprich; K Pummer
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.990

7.  The role of biopsy core number in selecting prostate cancer patients for active surveillance.

Authors:  Guillaume Ploussard; Evanguelos Xylinas; Laurent Salomon; Yves Allory; Dimitri Vordos; Andras Hoznek; Claude-Clément Abbou; Alexandre de la Taille
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of prostatic tumours, a comparison with X-ray CT and transrectal sonography (TRS).

Authors:  A Bockisch; N Jäger; H J Biersack; W Vahlensieck; B Hünermann; H G Schmitz; R Knopp; F Christ; C Winkler
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: a potential non-invasive marker of tumour aggressiveness in localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  N M deSouza; S F Riches; N J Vanas; V A Morgan; S A Ashley; C Fisher; G S Payne; C Parker
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 2.350

10.  Prostate cancer: detection of extracapsular extension by genitourinary and general body radiologists at MR imaging.

Authors:  Michael Mullerad; Hedvig Hricak; Liang Wang; Hui-Ni Chen; Michael W Kattan; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Transperineal biopsy of the prostate--is this the future?

Authors:  Dwayne T S Chang; Benjamin Challacombe; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Performance characteristics of MR imaging in the evaluation of clinically low-risk prostate cancer: a prospective study.

Authors:  Hebert Alberto Vargas; Oguz Akin; Amita Shukla-Dave; Jingbo Zhang; Kristen L Zakian; Junting Zheng; Kent Kanao; Debra A Goldman; Chaya S Moskowitz; Victor E Reuter; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Lupeol, a novel androgen receptor inhibitor: implications in prostate cancer therapy.

Authors:  Hifzur Rahman Siddique; Shrawan Kumar Mishra; R Jeffery Karnes; Mohammad Saleem
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 4.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: past, present and future.

Authors:  Eric A Singer; Aradhana Kaushal; Baris Turkbey; Anna Couvillon; Peter A Pinto; Howard L Parnes
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.645

5.  Clinical application of a 3D ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy system.

Authors:  Shyam Natarajan; Leonard S Marks; Daniel J A Margolis; Jiaoti Huang; Maria Luz Macairan; Patricia Lieu; Aaron Fenster
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.498

6.  [Potential of PET/MRI for diagnosis of prostate cancer].

Authors:  M C Röthke; A Afshar-Oromieh; H-P Schlemmer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer: a short review.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk; Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-10-21

Review 8.  Current role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nikolas Christopher Katelaris; Damien Michael Bolton; Mahesha Weerakoon; Liam Toner; Phillip Mark Katelaris; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-04-06

Review 9.  Magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: Comparative studies including radical prostatectomy specimens and template transperineal biopsy.

Authors:  Liam Toner; Mahesha Weerakoon; Damien M Bolton; Andrew Ryan; Nikolas Katelaris; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2015-10-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.