Literature DB >> 3797644

Clinical stage B prostate carcinoma: staging with MR imaging.

P R Biondetti, J K Lee, D Ling, W J Catalona.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging studies were performed in 29 patients with clinical findings of stage B prostatic carcinoma with use of both T1 and T2-weighted spin echo sequences. MR imaging findings were correlated with surgical/pathologic results in 18 patients who underwent an operation. Periprostatic fat, periprostatic venous plexus, seminal vesicles, and lymph nodes were assessed from MR imaging studies. When each was assessed independently, the periprostatic fat signal had a sensitivity of 29%, specificity of 100%, and accuracy of 85% in detecting extracapsular tumor extension, whereas the periprostatic venous plexus had a sensitivity of 57%, specificity of 86%, and accuracy of 80%. MR imaging had a sensitivity of 50%, specificity of 97%, and accuracy of 89% for detecting seminal vesicular involvement. When all four anatomic features were taken into consideration, MR imaging had an accuracy of 89% (16 of 18 patients) in differentiating stage B from stage C or D disease (sensitivity 87%, specificity 90%). Our data indicate that MR imaging is a promising method for staging prostatic carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3797644     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.162.2.3797644

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  6 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging in oncology.

Authors:  J E Husband; R Guy
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Two-dimensional MR spectroscopy of healthy and cancerous prostates in vivo.

Authors:  M Albert Thomas; Thomas Lange; S Sendhil Velan; Rajakumar Nagarajan; Steve Raman; Ana Gomez; Daniel Margolis; Stephany Swart; Raymond R Raylman; Rolf F Schulte; Peter Boesiger
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Prostate cancer: comparison of local staging accuracy of pelvic phased-array coil alone versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils. Local staging accuracy of prostate cancer using endorectal coil MR imaging.

Authors:  Jurgen J Fütterer; Marc R Engelbrecht; Gerrit J Jager; Robert P Hartman; Bernard F King; Christina A Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa; J Alfred Witjes; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  MRI for men undergoing active surveillance or with rising PSA and negative biopsies.

Authors:  Orit Raz; Masoom Haider; John Trachtenberg; Dan Leibovici; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of surface coil magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T for local staging of elevated risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Brian Kim; Rodney H Breau; Demetri Papadatos; Dean Fergusson; Steve Doucette; Ilias Cagiannos; Chris Morash
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Clinical experience with intra lymphatic administration of 111In-labelled monoclonal antibody PAY 276 for the detection of pelvic nodal metastases in prostatic carcinoma.

Authors:  H H Abdel-Nabi; J A Ortman-Nabi; W See; J Lee; R Ireton; M Boileau; M W Unger; C Halverson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1990
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.