Literature DB >> 20929850

A general mechanism for network-dosage compensation in gene circuits.

Murat Acar1, Bernardo F Pando, Frances H Arnold, Michael B Elowitz, Alexander van Oudenaarden.   

Abstract

Coping with variations in network dosage is crucial for maintaining optimal function in gene networks. We explored how network structure facilitates network-level dosage compensation. By using the yeast galactose network as a model, we combinatorially deleted one of the two copies of its four regulatory genes and found that network activity was robust to the change in network dosage. A mathematical analysis revealed that a two-component genetic circuit with elements of opposite regulatory activity (activator and inhibitor) constitutes a minimal requirement for network-dosage invariance. Specific interaction topologies and a one-to-one interaction stoichiometry between the activating and inhibiting agents were additional essential elements facilitating dosage invariance. This mechanism of network-dosage invariance could represent a general design for gene network structure in cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20929850      PMCID: PMC3138731          DOI: 10.1126/science.1190544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  26 in total

1.  A positive-feedback-based bistable 'memory module' that governs a cell fate decision.

Authors:  Wen Xiong; James E Ferrell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-11-27       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Regions of GAL4 critical for binding to a promoter in vivo revealed by a visual DNA-binding analysis.

Authors:  Akiko Mizutani; Masafumi Tanaka
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  U Alon; M G Surette; N Barkai; S Leibler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-01-14       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The protein Id: a negative regulator of helix-loop-helix DNA binding proteins.

Authors:  R Benezra; R L Davis; D Lockshon; D L Turner; H Weintraub
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-04-06       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Ploidy regulation of gene expression.

Authors:  T Galitski; A J Saldanha; C A Styles; E S Lander; G R Fink
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-07-09       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Comparison of classical and autogenous systems of regulation in inducible operons.

Authors:  M A Savageau
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1974-12-13       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Analysis of the galactose signal transduction pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: interaction between Gal3p and Gal80p.

Authors:  T Suzuki-Fujimoto; M Fukuma; K I Yano; H Sakurai; A Vonika; S A Johnston; T Fukasawa
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  The control of flux.

Authors:  H Kacser; J A Burns
Journal:  Symp Soc Exp Biol       Date:  1973

9.  Repression of yeast Ste12 transcription factor by direct binding of unphosphorylated Kss1 MAPK and its regulation by the Ste7 MEK.

Authors:  L Bardwell; J G Cook; D Voora; D M Baggott; A R Martinez; J Thorner
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  Protein-protein interactions among components of the Drosophila primary sex determination signal.

Authors:  Y Liu; J M Belote
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1995-07-28
View more
  56 in total

Review 1.  The developmental genetics of biological robustness.

Authors:  Lamia Mestek Boukhibar; Michalis Barkoulas
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 2.  High-resolution studies of lysis-lysogeny decision-making in bacteriophage lambda.

Authors:  Qiuyan Shao; Jimmy T Trinh; Lanying Zeng
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Escape from Adaptive Conflict follows from weak functional trade-offs and mutational robustness.

Authors:  Tobias Sikosek; Hue Sun Chan; Erich Bornberg-Bauer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Interallelic interaction and gene regulation in budding yeast.

Authors:  Daoyong Zhang; Lu Bai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A two-dimensional ERK-AKT signaling code for an NGF-triggered cell-fate decision.

Authors:  Jia-Yun Chen; Jia-Ren Lin; Karlene A Cimprich; Tobias Meyer
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Reconciling conflicting models for global control of cell-cycle transcription.

Authors:  Chun-Yi Cho; Francis C Motta; Christina M Kelliher; Anastasia Deckard; Steven B Haase
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 4.534

7.  Sex-specific pattern formation during early Drosophila development.

Authors:  Michael Z Ludwig; Martin Kreitman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  Adaptation of cells to new environments.

Authors:  Aaron N Brooks; Serdar Turkarslan; Karlyn D Beer; Fang Yin Lo; Nitin S Baliga
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2010-12-31

9.  Genetic regulatory network motifs constrain adaptation through curvature in the landscape of mutational (co)variance.

Authors:  Tyler D Hether; Paul A Hohenlohe
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Different Mechanisms Confer Gradual Control and Memory at Nutrient- and Stress-Regulated Genes in Yeast.

Authors:  Alessandro Rienzo; Daniel Poveda-Huertes; Selcan Aydin; Nicolas E Buchler; Amparo Pascual-Ahuir; Markus Proft
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.