Literature DB >> 25772543

Cardiac response to low-energy field pacing challenges the standard theory of defibrillation.

Bryan J Caldwell1, Mark L Trew2, Arkady M Pertsov1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The electric response of myocardial tissue to periodic field stimuli has attracted significant attention as the basis for low-energy antifibrillation pacing, potentially more effective than traditional single high-energy shocks. In conventional models, an electric field produces a highly nonuniform response of the myocardial wall, with discrete excitations, or hot spots (HS), occurring at cathodal tissue surfaces or large coronary vessels. We test this prediction using novel 3-dimensional tomographic optical imaging. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Experiments were performed in isolated coronary perfused pig ventricular wall preparations stained with near-infrared voltage-sensitive fluorescent dye DI-4-ANBDQBS. The 3-dimensional coordinates of HS were determined using alternating transillumination. To relate HS formation with myocardial structures, we used ultradeep confocal imaging (interrogation depths, >4 mm). The peak HS distribution is located deep inside the heart wall, and the depth is not significantly affected by field polarity. We did not observe the strong colocalization of HS with major coronary vessels anticipated from theory. Yet, we observed considerable lateral displacement of HS with field polarity reversal. Models that de-emphasized lateral intracellular coupling and accounted for resistive heterogeneity in the extracellular space showed similar HS distributions to the experimental observations.
CONCLUSIONS: The HS distributions within the myocardial wall and the significant lateral displacements with field polarity reversal are inconsistent with standard theories of defibrillation. Extended theories based on enhanced descriptions of cellular scale electric mechanisms may be necessary. The considerable lateral displacement of HS with field polarity reversal supports the hypothesis of biphasic stimuli in low-energy antifibrillation pacing being advantageous.
© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computer models; electrical stimulation; optical imaging

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25772543      PMCID: PMC4472493          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.114.002661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1941-3084


  38 in total

1.  An electric field mechanism for transmission of excitation between myocardial cells.

Authors:  Nicholas Sperelakis
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2002-11-29       Impact factor: 17.367

2.  Probing field-induced tissue polarization using transillumination fluorescent imaging.

Authors:  Bryan J Caldwell; Marcel Wellner; Bogdan G Mitrea; Arkady M Pertsov; Christian W Zemlin
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Wave emission from heterogeneities opens a way to controlling chaos in the heart.

Authors:  A Pumir; V Nikolski; M Hörning; A Isomura; K Agladze; K Yoshikawa; R Gilmour; E Bodenschatz; V Krinsky
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Calculation of optical signal using three-dimensional bidomain/diffusion model reveals distortion of the transmembrane potential.

Authors:  Phillip Prior; Bradley J Roth
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Three distinct directions of intramural activation reveal nonuniform side-to-side electrical coupling of ventricular myocytes.

Authors:  Bryan J Caldwell; Mark L Trew; Gregory B Sands; Darren A Hooks; Ian J LeGrice; Bruce H Smaill
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-06-18

6.  Ephaptic coupling of cortical neurons.

Authors:  Costas A Anastassiou; Rodrigo Perin; Henry Markram; Christof Koch
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-16       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 7.  The nature of electrical propagation in cardiac muscle.

Authors:  M S Spach; J M Kootsey
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1983-01

8.  Termination of atrial fibrillation using pulsed low-energy far-field stimulation.

Authors:  Flavio H Fenton; Stefan Luther; Elizabeth M Cherry; Niels F Otani; Valentin Krinsky; Alain Pumir; Eberhard Bodenschatz; Robert F Gilmour
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Nondestructive optical determination of fiber organization in intact myocardial wall.

Authors:  Rebecca M Smith; Arvydas Matiukas; Christian W Zemlin; Arkady M Pertsov
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.769

10.  Low-energy control of electrical turbulence in the heart.

Authors:  Stefan Luther; Flavio H Fenton; Bruce G Kornreich; Amgad Squires; Philip Bittihn; Daniel Hornung; Markus Zabel; James Flanders; Andrea Gladuli; Luis Campoy; Elizabeth M Cherry; Gisa Luther; Gerd Hasenfuss; Valentin I Krinsky; Alain Pumir; Robert F Gilmour; Eberhard Bodenschatz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Electrical Stimulation for Low-Energy Termination of Cardiac Arrhythmias: a Review.

Authors:  Skylar Buchan; Ronit Kar; Mathews John; Allison Post; Mehdi Razavi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 3.727

2.  Virtual electrodes around anatomical structures and their roles in defibrillation.

Authors:  Adam Connolly; Edward Vigmond; Martin Bishop
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.