PURPOSE: The provision of genetic services often occurs in a cascading fashion within families experiencing inherited diseases. This study examines whether previous family experiences with genetic services influences levels of psychological well-being of family members receiving services later. METHODS: Two hundred ninety-seven persons from 38 families with Lynch syndrome completed questionnaires before receiving genetic services. Baseline levels of test-related distress, depressive symptoms, and cancer worries were assessed in relationship to the (1) amount of time elapsed since services were provided to the index case and (2) generation of the family member relative to the index case. RESULTS: Family members in the same generation as the index case experienced significant increases in test-related distress (P = 0.003) and cancer worry (P = 0.001) with increasing time between receipt of genetic test results by the index case and provision of services to family members. Change in the number of depressive symptoms was not significant (P = 0.17). CONCLUSION: The provision of genetic services through a cascading approach significantly increases distress and worry among family members within the same generation as the index case who receive services at increasingly distant time intervals. Additional research is needed to explore social influences after the introduction of genetic services.
PURPOSE: The provision of genetic services often occurs in a cascading fashion within families experiencing inherited diseases. This study examines whether previous family experiences with genetic services influences levels of psychological well-being of family members receiving services later. METHODS: Two hundred ninety-seven persons from 38 families with Lynch syndrome completed questionnaires before receiving genetic services. Baseline levels of test-related distress, depressive symptoms, and cancer worries were assessed in relationship to the (1) amount of time elapsed since services were provided to the index case and (2) generation of the family member relative to the index case. RESULTS: Family members in the same generation as the index case experienced significant increases in test-related distress (P = 0.003) and cancer worry (P = 0.001) with increasing time between receipt of genetic test results by the index case and provision of services to family members. Change in the number of depressive symptoms was not significant (P = 0.17). CONCLUSION: The provision of genetic services through a cascading approach significantly increases distress and worry among family members within the same generation as the index case who receive services at increasingly distant time intervals. Additional research is needed to explore social influences after the introduction of genetic services.
Authors: Jennifer T Loud; Nancy E Weissman; June A Peters; Ruthann M Giusti; Benjamin S Wilfond; Wylie Burke; Mark H Greene Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-04-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Femke A de Snoo; Samantha R Riedijk; Anneke M van Mil; Wilma Bergman; Jeanet A C ter Huurne; Reinier Timman; Wieke Bertina; Nelleke A Gruis; Hans F A Vasen; Arie van Haeringen; Martijn H Breuning; Aad Tibben Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Heather Hampel; Julie A Stephens; Eero Pukkala; Risto Sankila; Lauri A Aaltonen; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin; Albert de la Chapelle Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: C Lerman; C Hughes; B J Trock; R E Myers; D Main; A Bonney; M R Abbaszadegan; A E Harty; B A Franklin; J F Lynch; H T Lynch Journal: JAMA Date: 1999-05-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Noralane M Lindor; Gloria M Petersen; Donald W Hadley; Anita Y Kinney; Susan Miesfeldt; Karen H Lu; Patrick Lynch; Wylie Burke; Nancy Press Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-09-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Muin J Khoury; Steven B Clauser; Andrew N Freedman; Elizabeth M Gillanders; Russ E Glasgow; William M P Klein; Sheri D Schully Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2011-07-27 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Pamela Holtzclaw Williams; Lucinda Shore; Marvin Sineath; Jim Quill; Barbara Warner; Jamila Keith; Deirdre Walker; Sara Wienke; Susan Flavin; Charlie Strange Journal: Nurs Clin North Am Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 1.208
Authors: Claire E Wakefield; Lucy V Hanlon; Katherine M Tucker; Andrea F Patenaude; Christina Signorelli; Jordana K McLoone; Richard J Cohn Journal: Genet Med Date: 2016-01-07 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Pedro Gomes; Giada Pietrabissa; Eunice R Silva; João Silva; Paula Mena Matos; Maria Emília Costa; Vanessa Bertuzzi; Eliana Silva; Maria Carolina Neves; Célia M D Sales Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-01-30 Impact factor: 3.390