Literature DB >> 18613292

Genetic testing in familial melanoma: uptake and implications.

Femke A de Snoo1, Samantha R Riedijk, Anneke M van Mil, Wilma Bergman, Jeanet A C ter Huurne, Reinier Timman, Wieke Bertina, Nelleke A Gruis, Hans F A Vasen, Arie van Haeringen, Martijn H Breuning, Aad Tibben.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We report on the uptake and psychological impact of p16-Leiden genetic testing to contribute to a greater understanding of counseling melanoma families.
METHODS: Within a defined research setting, genetic counseling and testing were offered to members of p16-Leiden-positive melanoma pedigrees, at risk of carrying a gene defect associated with an increased risk of melanoma and pancreatic cancer.
RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-four individuals sought counseling, of which 141 (77%) opted for genetic testing. Uptake of genetic counseling and testing, and psychological motivation was evaluated in 94 (57%) individuals. Higher pre-test risk of carrying the mutation and older age proved significantly predictive for counseling uptake. Age was predictive for test acceptance, whereas fearful test expectancies predicted test decline. Counselees had lower distress levels than those reported in other oncogenetic testing settings.
CONCLUSION: We are the first to report on genetic testing for familial melanoma. Following the first counseling session, we found a relatively high uptake rate for p16-Leiden testing and no clinically worrisome levels of distress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18613292     DOI: 10.1002/pon.1377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  7 in total

Review 1.  Clinical applications of melanoma genetics.

Authors:  Michele Gabree; Devanshi Patel; Linda Rodgers
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2014-06

2.  Returning individual research results: development of a cancer genetics education and risk communication protocol.

Authors:  J Scott Roberts; David I Shalowitz; Kurt D Christensen; Jessica N Everett; Scott Y H Kim; Leon Raskin; Stephen B Gruber
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  Psychological Impact of Learning CDKN2A Variant Status as a Genetic Research Result.

Authors:  Xuan Zhu; Emma R Leof; Kari G Rabe; Jennifer B McCormick; Gloria M Petersen; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  Disclosing individual CDKN2A research results to melanoma survivors: interest, impact, and demands on researchers.

Authors:  Kurt D Christensen; J Scott Roberts; David I Shalowitz; Jessica N Everett; Scott Y H Kim; Leon Raskin; Stephen B Gruber
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Addressing the ethical challenges in genetic testing and sequencing of children.

Authors:  Ellen Wright Clayton; Laurence B McCullough; Leslie G Biesecker; Steven Joffe; Lainie Friedman Ross; Susan M Wolf
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 11.229

6.  Generation after generation: exploring the psychological impact of providing genetic services through a cascading approach.

Authors:  Donald W Hadley; Sato Ashida; Jean F Jenkins; Jean C Martin; Kathleen A Calzone; Natalia R Kuhn; Colleen M McBride; Ilan R Kirsch; Laura M Koehly
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Management of melanoma families.

Authors:  Wilma Bergman; Nelleke A Gruis
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 6.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.