Literature DB >> 20919779

Surprise-induced blindness: a stimulus-driven attentional limit to conscious perception.

Christopher L Asplund1, J Jay Todd, A P Snyder, Christopher M Gilbert, René Marois.   

Abstract

The cost of attending to a visual event can be the failure to consciously detect other events. This processing limitation is well illustrated by the attentional blink paradigm, in which searching for and attending to a target presented in a rapid serial visual presentation stream of distractors can impair one's ability to detect a second target presented soon thereafter. The attentional blink critically depends on 'top-down' attentional settings, for it does not occur if participants are asked to ignore the first target. Here we show that 'bottom-up' attention can also lead to a profound but ephemeral deficit in conscious perception: Presentation of a novel, unexpected, and task-irrelevant stimulus virtually abolishes conscious detection of a target presented within half a second after the 'Surprise' stimulus, but only for its earliest occurrences (generally 1 to 2 presentations). This powerful but short-lived deficit contrasts with a milder but more enduring form of attentional capture that accompanies singleton presentations in rapid serial visual presentations. We conclude that the capture of stimulus-driven attention alone can limit explicit perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20919779      PMCID: PMC2998593          DOI: 10.1037/a0020551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  39 in total

1.  Attentional capture and inattentional blindness.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  A mechanical model for human attention and immediate memory.

Authors:  D E BROADBENT
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1957-05       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

4.  The attentional blink: resource depletion or temporary loss of control?

Authors:  Vincent Di Lollo; Jun-ichiro Kawahara; S M Shahab Ghorashi; James T Enns
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-04-29

5.  Rapid serial visual distraction: task-irrelevant items can produce an attentional blink.

Authors:  Troy A W Visser; Walter F Bischof; Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-11

6.  Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy.

Authors:  Stanislas Dehaene; Jean-Pierre Changeux; Lionel Naccache; Jérôme Sackur; Claire Sergent
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Attentional blink and attentional capture: endogenous versus exogenous control over paying attention to two important events in close succession.

Authors:  Thomas M Spalek; Laura J Falcon; Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-05

8.  Capturing focused attention.

Authors:  Gabriel Neo; Fook K Chua
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-11

9.  Repetition blindness: type recognition without token individuation.

Authors:  N G Kanwisher
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-11

10.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  M M Chun; M C Potter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  12 in total

1.  Statistical learning of visual transitions in monkey inferotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Travis Meyer; Carl R Olson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Rare targets are less susceptible to attention capture once detection has begun.

Authors:  Nicholas Hon; Gavin Ng; Gerald Chan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

3.  Task set flexibility and feature specificity modulate the limits of temporal attention.

Authors:  Elkan G Akyürek; Charlotte Köhne; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-08-08

4.  Surprise attracts the eyes and binds the gaze.

Authors:  Gernot Horstmann; Arvid Herwig
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-06

5.  Increase in internetwork functional connectivity in the human brain with attention capture.

Authors:  Hongyang Sun; Qiuhai Yue; Jocelyn L Sy; Douglass Godwin; Hana P Eaton; Padma Raghavan; René Marois
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Don't look now! Emotion-induced blindness: The interplay between emotion and attention.

Authors:  Stephanie C Goodhew; Mark Edwards
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  A central role for the lateral prefrontal cortex in goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention.

Authors:  Christopher L Asplund; J Jay Todd; Andy P Snyder; René Marois
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-07       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  The effects of stimulus-driven competition and task set on involuntary attention.

Authors:  Suk Won Han; René Marois
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 9.  Toward a computational theory of conscious processing.

Authors:  Stanislas Dehaene; Lucie Charles; Jean-Rémi King; Sébastien Marti
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2013-12-29       Impact factor: 6.627

10.  The emotional attentional blink: what we know so far.

Authors:  Maureen McHugo; Bunmi O Olatunji; David H Zald
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.