Literature DB >> 16933430

Attentional blink and attentional capture: endogenous versus exogenous control over paying attention to two important events in close succession.

Thomas M Spalek1, Laura J Falcon, Vincent Di Lollo.   

Abstract

Identification of the second of two targets is impaired if it is presented less than about 500 msec after the first This attentional blink (AB) occurs under dual-task conditions in which observers are required to report both targets. AB magnitude has been estimated by subtracting the accuracy scores in the dual task from the corresponding scores in a single task in which observers are instructed to ignore the first target. Experiment 1 showed this procedure to be inappropriate, because the first target cannot be ignored. The remaining three experiments elaborated on this finding andrevealed separate endogenous and exogenous sources of the second-target deficit. A parallel was drawn between the AB deficit and the deficit observed in attentional capture. Both types of deficit can be explained on the basis of a hybrid input-filtering model in which endogenous and exogenous factors are subserved by different pathways.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16933430     DOI: 10.3758/bf03208767

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  13 in total

1.  Phonological encoding in the attentional blink paradigm.

Authors:  Veronika Coltheart; Lisa S Yen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

2.  Unique sudden onsets capture attention even when observers are in feature-search mode.

Authors:  Thomas M Spalek; Matthew R Yanko; Paola Poiese; Hayley E P Lagroix
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-03-30

3.  The role of observer strategy in the single-target AB paradigm.

Authors:  Hayley E P Lagroix; Thomas M Spalek; Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-10

4.  The attentional blink: why does Lag-1 sparing occur when the dependent measure is accuracy, but Lag-1 deficit when it is RT?

Authors:  Hayley E P Lagroix; Vincent Di Lollo; Thomas M Spalek
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-05-26

5.  Task set flexibility and feature specificity modulate the limits of temporal attention.

Authors:  Elkan G Akyürek; Charlotte Köhne; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-08-08

6.  Spatiotemporal competition and task-relevance shape the spatial distribution of emotional interference during rapid visual processing: Evidence from gaze-contingent eye-tracking.

Authors:  Briana L Kennedy; Daniel Pearson; David J Sutton; Tom Beesley; Steven B Most
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Surprise-induced blindness: a stimulus-driven attentional limit to conscious perception.

Authors:  Christopher L Asplund; J Jay Todd; A P Snyder; Christopher M Gilbert; René Marois
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  When emotion blinds: a spatiotemporal competition account of emotion-induced blindness.

Authors:  Lingling Wang; Briana L Kennedy; Steven B Most
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-07

9.  Target cueing provides support for target- and resource-based models of the attentional blink.

Authors:  Hannah L Pincham; Dénes Szűcs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A bottleneck model of set-specific capture.

Authors:  Katherine Sledge Moore; Daniel H Weissman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.