Literature DB >> 26335411

Rare targets are less susceptible to attention capture once detection has begun.

Nicholas Hon1, Gavin Ng2, Gerald Chan2.   

Abstract

Rare or low probability targets are detected more slowly and/ or less accurately than higher probability counterparts. Various proposals have implicated perceptual and response-based processes in this deficit. Recent evidence, however, suggests that it is attentional in nature, with low probability targets requiring more attentional resources than high probability ones to detect. This difference in attentional requirements, in turn, suggests the possibility that low and high probability targets may have different susceptibilities to attention capture, which is also known to be resource-dependent. Supporting this hypothesis, we found that, once attentional resources have begun to be engaged by detection processes, low, but not high, probability targets have a reduced susceptibility to capture. Our findings speak to several issues. First, they indicate that the likelihood of attention capture occurring when a given task-relevant stimulus is being processed is dependent, to some extent, on how said stimulus is represented within mental task sets. Second, they provide added support for the idea that the behavioural deficit associated with low probability targets is attention-based. Finally, the current data point to reduced top-down biasing of target templates as a likely mechanism underlying the attentional locus of the deficit in question.

Keywords:  Attention; Attention capture

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26335411     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0921-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  28 in total

Review 1.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 2.  Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Todd S Horowitz; Michael J Van Wert; Naomi M Kenner; Skyler S Place; Nour Kibbi
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-11

4.  Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity.

Authors:  J Theeuwes
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-08

5.  Is the exogenous orienting of spatial attention truly automatic? Evidence from unimodal and multisensory studies.

Authors:  Valerio Santangelo; Charles Spence
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2008-05-09

6.  On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability.

Authors:  C C Duncan-Johnson; E Donchin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  The trajectory of the target probability effect.

Authors:  Nicholas Hon; Melvin J Yap; Syaheed B Jabar
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  On the automaticity of contingent capture: disruption caused by the attentional blink.

Authors:  Feng Du; Jiaoyan Yang; Yue Yin; Kan Zhang; Richard A Abrams
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10

9.  Visual motion and attentional capture.

Authors:  A P Hillstrom; S Yantis
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-04

10.  Involuntary attentional shifts due to orientation differences.

Authors:  J S Joseph; L M Optican
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.