Literature DB >> 15813204

Rapid serial visual distraction: task-irrelevant items can produce an attentional blink.

Troy A W Visser1, Walter F Bischof, Vincent Di Lollo.   

Abstract

When two sequential targets (T1 and T2) are presented within about 600 msec, perception of the second target is impaired. This attentional blink (AB) has been studied by means of two paradigms: rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP), in which targets are embedded in a stream of central distractors, and the two-target paradigm, in which targets are presented eccentrically without distractors. We examined the role of distractors in the AB, using a modified two-target paradigm with a central stream of task-irrelevant distractors. In six experiments, the RSVP stream of distractors substantially impaired identification of both T1 and T2, but only when the distractors shared common characteristics with the targets. Without such commonalities, the distractors had no effect on performance. This points to the subjects' attentional control setting as an important factor in the AB deficit and suggests a conceptual link between the AB and a form of nonspatial contingent capture attributable to distractor processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15813204     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  16 in total

1.  Spreading the sparing: against a limited-capacity account of the attentional blink.

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers; Stefan van der Stigchel; Johan Hulleman
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-12-08

2.  The attentional blink is not a unitary phenomenon.

Authors:  Jun-ichiro Kawahara; James T Enns; Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-12-13

3.  When similarity leads to sparing: probing mechanisms underlying the attentional blink.

Authors:  Troy A W Visser; Corinne Davis; Jeneva L Ohan
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-08-12

4.  On the time course of attentional focusing in older adults.

Authors:  Lisa N Jefferies; Alexa B Roggeveen; James T Enns; Patrick J Bennett; Allison B Sekuler; Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-15

5.  Neither backward masking of T2 nor task switching is necessary for the attentional blink.

Authors:  Ali Jannati; Thomas M Spalek; Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-02

6.  Spatiotemporal competition and task-relevance shape the spatial distribution of emotional interference during rapid visual processing: Evidence from gaze-contingent eye-tracking.

Authors:  Briana L Kennedy; Daniel Pearson; David J Sutton; Tom Beesley; Steven B Most
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Surprise-induced blindness: a stimulus-driven attentional limit to conscious perception.

Authors:  Christopher L Asplund; J Jay Todd; A P Snyder; Christopher M Gilbert; René Marois
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Attentional and perceptual factors affecting the attentional blink for faces and objects.

Authors:  Ayelet N Landau; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  How does information processing speed relate to the attentional blink?

Authors:  Troy A W Visser; Jeneva L Ohan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Distractor inhibition predicts individual differences in recovery from the attentional blink.

Authors:  Heleen A Slagter; Katerina Georgopoulou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.