Literature DB >> 2089152

Toward the development of consumer-based criteria for the evaluation of assistive devices.

A I Batavia1, G S Hammer.   

Abstract

The most important basis for evaluating an assistive device is whether it satisfies the needs of the disabled consumer. However, the factors that consumers consider in determining whether a device meets their needs are not well understood. This preliminary study applied a small focus group process to identify and prioritize factors used by long-term users of assistive technology in assessing their devices. A modified version of the Delphi Method was applied to two groups of long-term users--a Panel of Consumer Experts with Mobility Impairments and a Panel of Consumer Experts with Sensory Impairments. In total, the panels identified and prioritized 17 general factors for 11 types of assistive technologies. This study constitutes an initial step toward the development of design, engineering, and selection criteria based on the specific concerns of consumers.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2089152     DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.1990.10.0425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  12 in total

Review 1.  A multidimensional conceptual framework for analysing public involvement in health services research.

Authors:  Sandy R Oliver; Rebecca W Rees; Lorna Clarke-Jones; Ruairidh Milne; Ann R Oakley; John Gabbay; Ken Stein; Phyll Buchanan; Gill Gyte
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 2.  Restoring standing capabilities with feedback control of functional neuromuscular stimulation following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Raviraj Nataraj; Musa L Audu; Ronald J Triolo
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.242

3.  Understanding stand-to-sit maneuver: implications for motor system neuroprostheses after paralysis.

Authors:  Sarah R Chang; Rudi Kobetic; Ronald J Triolo
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2014

4.  Towards Including End-Users in the Design of Prosthetic Hands: Ethical Analysis of a Survey of Australians with Upper-Limb Difference.

Authors:  Mary Jean Walker; Eliza Goddard; Benjamin Stephens-Fripp; Gursel Alici
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  The association between difficulty using positive airway pressure equipment and adherence to therapy: a pilot study.

Authors:  Constance H Fung; Jennifer L Martin; Uyi Igodan; Stella Jouldjian; Cathy Alessi
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 2.816

6.  Feasibility and usability of a wearable orthotic for stroke survivors with hand impairment.

Authors:  Kishor Lakshminarayanan; Fa Wang; John G Webster; Na Jin Seo
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2016-01-06

7.  The user-centered design as novel perspective for evaluating the usability of BCI-controlled applications.

Authors:  Andrea Kübler; Elisa M Holz; Angela Riccio; Claudia Zickler; Tobias Kaufmann; Sonja C Kleih; Pit Staiger-Sälzer; Lorenzo Desideri; Evert-Jan Hoogerwerf; Donatella Mattia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Robotic devices for paediatric rehabilitation: a review of design features.

Authors:  Alberto Gonzalez; Lorenzo Garcia; Jeff Kilby; Peter McNair
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 9.  Measuring mental workload in assistive wearable devices: a review.

Authors:  Charlotte Marchand; Jozina B De Graaf; Nathanaël Jarrassé
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-11-07       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Prosthesis to Enable a Patient with Above-Elbow Amputation to Resume Hunting.

Authors:  Laurent ThÉfenne; Bénédicte GuÉrin; Arnaud Jouvion; Héléne Bisseriex; Bertrand TourÉ; Janyce Cantu; Thomas Trappier; Maxime Obrecht; Gratiane De Brier
Journal:  J Rehabil Med Clin Commun       Date:  2019-12-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.