Literature DB >> 20889076

Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy.

Ann G Zauber1.   

Abstract

This article presents a cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening tests that have been recommended by the United States Preventive Services Task Force, American Cancer Society US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer American College of Radiology, or the American College of Gastroenterology. This cost-effectiveness analysis supports a common theme of the 3 guideline groups that there are multiple acceptable colorectal cancer screening strategies (including colonoscopy). The article shows which recommended strategies are also cost-effective given a range of willingness to pay per life-year gained. The set of cost-effective strategies includes tests that primarily detect cancer early (annual sensitive fecal occult blood tests [FOBTs]; either guaiac or fecal immunochemical tests, but not Hemoccult II), as well as those that can prevent colorectal cancer (flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 years with a frequent sensitive FOBT [but not flexible sigmoidoscopy as a standalone test], and colonoscopy). Computed tomographic colonography was not a cost-effective strategy. Stool DNA testing was not assessed in the analysis for this article.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20889076      PMCID: PMC4145837          DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2010.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am        ISSN: 1052-5157


  69 in total

1.  Visualizing cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  David H Mark
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-05-08       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; John L Petrini; Todd H Baron; Amitabh Chak; Jonathan Cohen; Stephen E Deal; Brenda Hoffman; Brian C Jacobson; Klaus Mergener; Bret T Petersen; Michael A Safdi; Douglas O Faigel; Irving M Pike
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Which colon cancer screening test? A comparison of costs, effectiveness, and compliance.

Authors:  S Vijan; E W Hwang; T P Hofer; R A Hayward
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 4.  Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society.

Authors:  Sidney J Winawer; Ann G Zauber; Robert H Fletcher; Jonathon S Stillman; Michael J O'Brien; Bernard Levin; Robert A Smith; David A Lieberman; Randall W Burt; Theodore R Levin; John H Bond; Durado Brooks; Tim Byers; Neil Hyman; Lynne Kirk; Alan Thorson; Clifford Simmang; David Johnson; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Cost-utility of one-time colonoscopic screening for colorectal cancer at various ages.

Authors:  R M Ness; A M Holmes; R Klein; R Dittus
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J D Hardcastle; J O Chamberlain; M H Robinson; S M Moss; S S Amar; T W Balfour; P D James; C M Mangham
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers.

Authors:  C Daniel Johnson; Mei-Hsiu Chen; Alicia Y Toledano; Jay P Heiken; Abraham Dachman; Mark D Kuo; Christine O Menias; Betina Siewert; Jugesh I Cheema; Richard G Obregon; Jeff L Fidler; Peter Zimmerman; Karen M Horton; Kevin Coakley; Revathy B Iyer; Amy K Hara; Robert A Halvorsen; Giovanna Casola; Judy Yee; Benjamin A Herman; Lawrence J Burgart; Paul J Limburg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Michael Pignone; Melissa Rich; Steven M Teutsch; Alfred O Berg; Kathleen N Lohr
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-16       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Evaluating test strategies for colorectal cancer screening: a decision analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Ann G Zauber; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Amy B Knudsen; Janneke Wilschut; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Karen M Kuntz
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  The incidence of colorectal cancer following a negative screening sigmoidoscopy: implications for screening interval.

Authors:  V Paul Doria-Rose; Theodore R Levin; Joe V Selby; Polly A Newcomb; Kathryn E Richert-Boe; Noel S Weiss
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  15 in total

1.  What Happened to Disparities in CRC Screening Among FFS Medicare Enrollees Following Medicare Modernization?

Authors:  Lee R Mobley; Tzy-Mey Kuo; Mei Zhou; Yamisha Rutherford; Seth Meador; Julia Koschinsky
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2018-09-19

2.  Analysis of the benefits and costs of a national campaign to promote colorectal cancer screening: CDC's screen for life-national colorectal cancer action campaign.

Authors:  Donatus U Ekwueme; David H Howard; Cynthia A Gelb; Sun Hee Rim; Crystale P Cooper
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2014-02-06

Review 3.  Quality measures for colonoscopy: where should we be in 2015?

Authors:  John I Allen
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2015-03

4.  Costs and benefits of an organized fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening program in the United States.

Authors:  Gery P Guy; Lisa C Richardson; Michael P Pignone; Marcus Plescia
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Fertility Impact of Initial Operation Type for Female Ulcerative Colitis Patients.

Authors:  Adam S Faye; Aaron Oh; Lindsay D Kumble; Ravi P Kiran; Timothy Wen; Garrett Lawlor; Simon Lichtiger; Maria T Abreu; Chin Hur
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 5.325

6.  Evaluating Molecular Biomarkers for the Early Detection of Lung Cancer: When Is a Biomarker Ready for Clinical Use? An Official American Thoracic Society Policy Statement.

Authors:  Peter J Mazzone; Catherine Rufatto Sears; Doug A Arenberg; Mina Gaga; Michael K Gould; Pierre P Massion; Vish S Nair; Charles A Powell; Gerard A Silvestri; Anil Vachani; Renda Soylemez Wiener
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 21.405

7.  Assessing adherence and cost-benefit of colorectal cancer screening for accountable providers.

Authors:  Trace Heavener; Frank W McStay; Victoria Jaeger; Kristen Stephenson; Lauren Sager; James Sing
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2019-08-21

Review 8.  Disparities in endoscopy use for colorectal cancer screening in the United States.

Authors:  Andrew J Gawron; Rena Yadlapati
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Medicare modernization and diffusion of endoscopy in FFS medicare.

Authors:  Lee R Mobley; Pedro Amaral; Tzy-Mey Kuo; Mei Zhou; Srimoyee Bose
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2017-03-09

10.  Review of economic evidence in the prevention and early detection of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kim E Jeong; John A Cairns
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2013-09-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.