Literature DB >> 24505055

Analysis of the benefits and costs of a national campaign to promote colorectal cancer screening: CDC's screen for life-national colorectal cancer action campaign.

Donatus U Ekwueme1, David H Howard2, Cynthia A Gelb3, Sun Hee Rim3, Crystale P Cooper4.   

Abstract

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Screen for Life: National Colorectal Cancer Action Campaign (SFL) is one of the longest running national multimedia campaigns to promote colorectal cancer screening. Since its inception in 1999, no study has quantified the benefits and costs of SFL. We modeled the impact of SFL campaign on screening rates, assuming that the effect size would range from 0.5% to 10% of the unscreened population exposed to the campaign in the last 14 years. Given the estimated benefits of the campaign and costs, we calculated the cost per person screened (2012 dollars). We hypothesize that if 0.5% of the population exposed to campaign messages were screened for colorectal cancer, an additional 251,000 previously unscreened individuals would be screened. The average cost of SFL per person screened would be $2.44. On the other hand, if 10% of the population exposed to campaign messages were screened, an additional 5.01 million individuals would be screened. The average cost per person screened would be $0.12. Results indicate that SFL improves screening rates at a relatively low cost per person screened. The findings in this study provide an important starting point and benchmark for future research efforts to determine the benefits and costs of health communication campaigns to promote cancer prevention.
© 2014 Society for Public Health Education.

Entities:  

Keywords:  benefits; cancer prevention and control; colorectal cancer; costs; health communication; health promotion; mass media

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24505055      PMCID: PMC5836740          DOI: 10.1177/1524839913519446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Promot Pract        ISSN: 1524-8399


  19 in total

1.  Colorectal cancer prevention 2000: screening recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology. American College of Gastroenterology.

Authors:  D K Rex; D A Johnson; D A Lieberman; R W Burt; A Sonnenberg
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 2.  Lessons learned from public health mass media campaigns: marketing health in a crowded media world.

Authors:  Whitney Randolph; K Viswanath
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 21.981

3.  Observations from the CDC: CDC's Screen for Life: a National Colorectal Cancer Action Campaign.

Authors:  C M Jorgensen; C A Gelb; T L Merritt; L C Seeff
Journal:  J Womens Health Gend Based Med       Date:  2001-06

4.  Cancer screening - United States, 2010.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 17.586

Review 5.  Health communication campaigns and their impact on behavior.

Authors:  Leslie B Snyder
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.045

6.  Cost-effectiveness of patient mailings to promote colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Thomas D Sequist; Calvin Franz; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 7.  HIV/AIDS communication campaigns: progress and prospects.

Authors:  S L Myhre; J A Flora
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2000

8.  Patterns of colorectal cancer test use, including CT colonography, in the 2010 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Jean A Shapiro; Carrie N Klabunde; Trevor D Thompson; Marion R Nadel; Laura C Seeff; Arica White
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J D Hardcastle; J O Chamberlain; M H Robinson; S M Moss; S S Amar; T W Balfour; P D James; C M Mangham
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test.

Authors:  O Kronborg; C Fenger; J Olsen; O D Jørgensen; O Søndergaard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  7 in total

1.  Opportunities to Expand Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation.

Authors:  Crystale Purvis Cooper; Cynthia A Gelb
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Process Evaluation of Cancer Prevention Media Campaigns in Appalachian Ohio.

Authors:  Mira L Katz; Gregory S Young; Paul L Reiter; Michael L Pennell; Jesse J Plascak; Barret J Zimmermann; Janice L Krieger; Michael D Slater; Cathy M Tatum; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2016-07-09

3.  Ovarian Cancer Knowledge in Women and Providers Following Education with Inside Knowledge Campaign Materials.

Authors:  Mary C Puckett; Julie S Townsend; Cynthia A Gelb; Polly Hager; Amy Conlon; Sherri L Stewart
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Estimating health benefits and cost-savings for achieving the Healthy People 2020 objective of reducing invasive colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Mei-Chuan Hung; Donatus U Ekwueme; Arica White; Sun Hee Rim; Jessica B King; Jung-Der Wang; Su-Hsin Chang
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Expenditures on Screening Promotion Activities in CDC's Colorectal Cancer Control Program, 2009-2014.

Authors:  Florence K L Tangka; Sujha Subramanian; Sonja Hoover; Maggie Cole-Beebe; Amy DeGroff; Djenaba Joseph; Sajal Chattopadhyay
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 2.830

6.  Using Facebook to promote the uptake of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Arlinda Ruco; Nancy N Baxter; Jenna Jacobson; Jill Tinmouth; Diego Llovet
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  A Media and Clinic Intervention to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Ohio Appalachia.

Authors:  Jessica L Krok-Schoen; Mira L Katz; Jill M Oliveri; Gregory S Young; Michael L Pennell; Paul L Reiter; Jesse J Plascak; Michael D Slater; Janice L Krieger; Cathy M Tatum; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.