Literature DB >> 31656403

Assessing adherence and cost-benefit of colorectal cancer screening for accountable providers.

Trace Heavener1, Frank W McStay2, Victoria Jaeger1, Kristen Stephenson1, Lauren Sager3, James Sing4.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess adherence and costs-benefits of colorectal cancer (CRC) screenings from an accountable care organization/population health perspective. We performed a retrospective review of 94 patients (50-75 years of age) in an integrated safety net system for whom fecal CRC screening was abnormal for the period of June 1, 2014, to June 1, 2016. A cost-benefit model was constructed using Medicare payment rates and a sensitivity analysis. Most patients included in the study (64/94, 68%) received or were offered a colonoscopy. Of those receiving a colonoscopy, 24 of 45 (53%) had an abnormal finding. Total direct medical costs avoided by screening the patient panel was $32,926 but could have exceeded $63,237 had more patients received follow-up colonoscopies. A sensitivity analysis with 1000 patients demonstrated total monetary benefits between $2.2 million and $8.16 million when follow-up and colonoscopy rates were allowed to vary. Although the resulting rates of follow-up were within the range reported in the literature, there is room for improvement, especially considering the monetary benefit that could be used on other diseases. Health systems and payers should work cooperatively to structure payment models to better incentivize CRC screenings.
© 2019 Baylor University Medical Center.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer screening; cost-benefit model; preventive care

Year:  2019        PMID: 31656403      PMCID: PMC6793958          DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2019.1647702

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)        ISSN: 0899-8280


  50 in total

1.  Timeliness of Colonoscopy After Abnormal Fecal Test Results in a Safety Net Practice.

Authors:  Ann Oluloro; Amanda F Petrik; Ann Turner; Tanya Kapka; Jennifer Rivelli; Patricia A Carney; Somnath Saha; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2016-08

2.  Inadequate Utilization of Diagnostic Colonoscopy Following Abnormal FIT Results in an Integrated Safety-Net System.

Authors:  Rachel B Issaka; Maneesh H Singh; Sachiko M Oshima; Victoria J Laleau; Carly D Rachocki; Ellen H Chen; Lukejohn W Day; Urmimala Sarkar; Ma Somsouk
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Understanding current racial/ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer screening in the United States: the contribution of socioeconomic status and access to care.

Authors:  David T Liss; David W Baker
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Barriers to full colon evaluation for a positive fecal occult blood test.

Authors:  Deborah A Fisher; Amy Jeffreys; Cynthia J Coffman; Kenneth Fasanella
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Estimation of Benefits, Burden, and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Amy B Knudsen; Ann G Zauber; Carolyn M Rutter; Steffie K Naber; V Paul Doria-Rose; Chester Pabiniak; Colden Johanson; Sara E Fischer; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Karen M Kuntz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy.

Authors:  Ann G Zauber
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2010-10

7.  Colon cancer treatment costs for Medicare and dually eligible beneficiaries.

Authors:  Zhehui Luo; Cathy J Bradley; Bassam A Dahman; Joseph C Gardiner
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2010

8.  Risk of progression of advanced adenomas to colorectal cancer by age and sex: estimates based on 840,149 screening colonoscopies.

Authors:  Hermann Brenner; Michael Hoffmeister; Christa Stegmaier; Gerhard Brenner; Lutz Altenhofen; Ulrike Haug
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-06-25       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Cost Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Interventions with Their Effects on Health Disparity Being Considered.

Authors:  Kwang-Sig Lee; Eun-Cheol Park
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 4.679

10.  Colorectal Cancer Risk Following Adenoma Removal: A Large Prospective Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Helen G Coleman; Maurice B Loughrey; Liam J Murray; Brian T Johnston; Anna T Gavin; Martha J Shrubsole; Shivaram K Bhat; Patrick B Allen; Vivienne McConnell; Marie M Cantwell
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  1 in total

1.  Preventing Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Deaths: Assessing the Impact of Increased Screening.

Authors:  Krishna P Sharma; Scott D Grosse; Michael V Maciosek; Djenaba Joseph; Kakoli Roy; Lisa C Richardson; Harold Jaffe
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 2.830

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.